H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Tanya Harford vs Ivanna Madruga H2H: 0-1

Ivanna Madruga holds a 1–0 lead over Tanya Harford in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ivanna Madruga leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ivanna Madruga won the 1980 Salt Lake City semifinal 6-1 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tanya Harford
RSA Age 67 Right-Handed 162 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Ivanna Madruga
ARG Age 65

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ivanna Madruga 6-1 6-0 Tanya Harford Match data Sep 13, 1980* SF Salt Lake City WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tanya Harford — — — 1,784 50 71 41.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ivanna Madruga — — — 1,916 131 88 59.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tanya Harford Ivanna Madruga
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,504 0 0
15 1974 0–1 0.0% — 1,496 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1975 0–1 0.0% — 1,479 0 0 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
17 1976 4–5 44.4% — 1,512 0 0 1978 6–6 50.0% — 1,555 0 0
18 1977 7–13 35.0% — 1,559 0 0 1979 7–10 41.2% — 1,628 0 0
19 1978 3–6 33.3% — 1,558 0 0 1980 29–18 61.7% — 1,799 0 0
20 1979 13–10 56.5% — 1,716 0 0 1981 17–14 54.8% — 1,752 0 0
21 1980 12–20 37.5% — 1,673 0 0 1982 27–13 67.5% — 1,822 0 1
22 1981 8–10 44.4% — 1,630 0 0 1983 25–12 67.6% — 1,881 0 1
23 1982 3–5 37.5% — 1,629 0 0 1984 14–8 63.6% — 1,830 0 1
25 — — — — — — — 1986 5–5 50.0% — 1,775 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tanya Harford Ivanna Madruga
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
15 1974 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1975 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1976 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
18 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1979 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1978 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1980 10 6 16 62.5% 19 8 27 70.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 1979 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1981 0 3 3 0.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1980 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 5 7 12 41.7% 3 9 12 25.0% 1982 2 3 5 40.0% 25 10 35 71.4% — — — — — — — —
22 1981 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1983 7 3 10 70.0% 17 8 25 68.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1984 — — — — 14 8 22 63.6% — — — — — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 15 22 37 40.5% 11 14 25 44.0% 15 19 34 44.1% 8 15 23 34.8% — 22 18 40 55.0% 99 53 152 65.1% 6 9 15 40.0% 1 5 6 16.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tanya Harford Ivanna Madruga
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1505 101.3 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.30
15 1974 1497 100.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1975 1479 94.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.26 1977 1490 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.22
17 1976 1512 106.0 — — — — +67 +25 — 44.4% -0.61 0–2 1–0 — +0.59 1978 1556 122.4 — — — — — +14 — 55.2% +0.10 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — +0.29
18 1977 1559 123.8 — — — — +23 +25 -88 38.3% -0.58 3–4 (43%) 1–3 (25%) 98.8 +1.04 1979 1628 139.2 — — — — +21 -20 -52 45.0% -0.15 2–4 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 97.3 -0.36
19 1978 1559 111.9 — — — — +34 — — 41.7% -0.71 2–4 (33%) 0–1 — +0.55 1980 1799 145.3 — — — — -111 +67 — 59.8% +1.16 9–3 (75%) 3–6 (33%) 106.3 -5.59
20 1979 1716 133.6 — — — — -51 — -60 51.8% -0.18 7–3 (70%) 3–1 (75%) 108.7 +1.24 1981 1752 140.7 — — — — -101 +165 -157 55.6% +0.39 4–6 (40%) 4–1 (80%) 100.1 -2.27
21 1980 1674 130.7 — — — — -52 — -27 40.0% -0.81 5–6 (45%) 2–4 (33%) 98.1 -2.35 1982 1822 151.7 — — — — -199 +149 — 64.4% +1.49 6–4 (60%) 1–1 — -2.76
22 1981 1631 111.6 — — — — +32 -43 0 52.4% +0.12 2–6 (25%) 4–3 (57%) 97.4 +2.28 1983 1882 143.6 — — — — -151 +78 — 65.9% +1.35 4–4 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 96.8 +0.61
23 1982 1629 118.4 — — — — — -65 +42 44.4% -0.44 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.05 1984 1830 128.9 — — — — — +30 — 63.3% +1.12 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.18
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1776 112.3 — — — — — +16 — 45.5% -0.23 2–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.28
Career — 1785 128.9 — — — — -15 -5 -32 44.0% -0.51 19–27 (41%) 12–14 (46%) 98.7 +2.85 — 1917 148.0 — — — — -116 +85 -109 59.2% +0.89 30–28 (52%) 12–18 (40%) 98.1 -4.16

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.