H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Tanya Harford vs Julie Anthony H2H: 1-0
Tanya Harford holds a 1–0 lead over Julie Anthony in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tanya Harford leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tanya Harford won the 1977 Charlotte third round 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 67
Right-Handed
162 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 78
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 1977* | Charlotte | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Tanya Harford | 6-1 6-0 | Julie Anthony | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tanya Harford | — | — | — | 1,786 | 50 | 71 | 41.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Julie Anthony | — | — | — | 1,825 | 74 | 88 | 45.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tanya Harford | Julie Anthony | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1976 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1977 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1978 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1979 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1980 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1981 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1982 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 16–10 | 61.5% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 16–9 | 64.0% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 5–2 | 71.4% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 15–17 | 46.9% | — | 1,770 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,714 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 10–16 | 38.5% | — | 1,768 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 2–11 | 15.4% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 3 |