H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Tanya Harford vs Kate Latham H2H: 1-0

Tanya Harford holds a 1–0 lead over Kate Latham in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tanya Harford leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Tanya Harford won the 1980 Chicago round of 32 6-3 2-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tanya Harford
RSA Age 67 Right-Handed 162 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Kate Latham
USA Age 73

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tanya Harford 6-3 2-6 6-3 Kate Latham Match data Jan 24, 1980* R32 Chicago WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tanya Harford — — — 1,784 50 71 41.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kate Latham — — — 1,864 198 202 49.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tanya Harford Kate Latham
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1974 0–1 0.0% — 1,496 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1975 0–1 0.0% — 1,479 0 0 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
17 1976 4–5 44.4% — 1,512 0 0 1970 1–3 25.0% — 1,475 0 0
18 1977 7–13 35.0% — 1,559 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1978 3–6 33.3% — 1,558 0 0 1972 3–3 50.0% — 1,502 0 0
20 1979 13–10 56.5% — 1,716 0 0 1973 6–7 46.2% — 1,587 0 0
21 1980 12–20 37.5% — 1,673 0 0 1974 40–16 71.4% — 1,828 0 3
22 1981 8–10 44.4% — 1,630 0 0 1975 15–20 42.9% — 1,684 0 3
23 1982 3–5 37.5% — 1,629 0 0 1976 4–2 66.7% — 1,676 0 3
24 — — — — — — — 1977 15–12 55.6% — 1,748 0 3
25 — — — — — — — 1978 13–17 43.3% — 1,660 0 3
26 — — — — — — — 1979 21–23 47.7% — 1,852 0 3
27 — — — — — — — 1980 23–22 51.1% — 1,748 0 4
28 — — — — — — — 1981 21–20 51.2% — 1,774 0 5
29 — — — — — — — 1982 24–28 46.2% — 1,684 0 5
30 — — — — — — — 1983 9–16 36.0% — 1,623 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 1984 0–11 0.0% — 1,492 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 1985 3–1 75.0% — 1,526 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tanya Harford Kate Latham
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1974 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1975 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1976 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1970 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1978 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1979 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1973 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — —
21 1980 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 5 7 12 41.7% 3 9 12 25.0% 1974 15 5 20 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 17 6 23 73.9% 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1981 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
23 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1976 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 4 4 8 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 8 7 15 53.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 10 16 37.5%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 9 12 25.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 10 16 37.5%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 9 7 16 56.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 7 9 16 43.8%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 6 8 14 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career — 15 22 37 40.5% 11 14 25 44.0% 15 19 34 44.1% 8 15 23 34.8% — 70 67 137 51.1% 26 38 64 40.6% 41 33 74 55.4% 27 55 82 32.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tanya Harford Kate Latham
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1974 1497 100.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1975 1479 94.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.26 1969 1489 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.07
17 1976 1512 106.0 — — — — +67 +25 — 44.4% -0.61 0–2 1–0 — +0.59 1970 1476 93.6 — — — — +10 — — 25.0% -2.63 — — — +0.42
18 1977 1559 123.8 — — — — +23 +25 -88 38.3% -0.58 3–4 (43%) 1–3 (25%) 98.8 +1.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1978 1559 111.9 — — — — +34 — — 41.7% -0.71 2–4 (33%) 0–1 — +0.55 1972 1503 99.9 — — — — — +39 — 45.5% -0.54 0–1 — — +0.62
20 1979 1716 133.6 — — — — -51 — -60 51.8% -0.18 7–3 (70%) 3–1 (75%) 108.7 +1.24 1973 1587 129.0 — — — — -41 — 0 48.3% +0.14 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.26
21 1980 1674 130.7 — — — — -52 — -27 40.0% -0.81 5–6 (45%) 2–4 (33%) 98.1 -2.35 1974 1828 140.0 — — — — -65 -181 -31 68.9% +1.55 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 99.0 +3.26
22 1981 1631 111.6 — — — — +32 -43 0 52.4% +0.12 2–6 (25%) 4–3 (57%) 97.4 +2.28 1975 1685 132.9 — — — — +12 -76 — 45.3% -0.03 1–4 (20%) 1–7 (13%) 89.6 -0.75
23 1982 1629 118.4 — — — — — -65 +42 44.4% -0.44 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.05 1976 1676 107.6 — — — — +22 — — 57.1% +1.00 2–0 1–0 — +2.30
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1749 140.9 — — — — -7 -119 — 54.2% +0.34 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) 103.9 -0.90
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1661 118.3 — — — — +8 -10 +69 43.3% -0.58 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 105.3 +2.03
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1852 149.5 — — — — -20 -164 -96 45.5% -0.29 8–7 (53%) 4–4 (50%) 102.4 -2.22
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1749 133.1 — — — — -30 — +16 51.5% +0.05 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 96.7 -1.81
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1774 142.7 — — — — -17 — +6 52.1% +0.14 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -1.96
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1685 128.0 — — — — +51 -102 +34 44.5% -0.56 10–5 (67%) 5–2 (71%) 106.2 -0.31
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1624 115.0 — — — — +51 -49 +71 40.3% -0.61 7–9 (44%) 3–6 (33%) 96.8 +0.84
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1492 91.5 — — — — +52 +30 — 8.3% -3.08 0–2 0–1 — +0.50
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1527 102.8 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.40 2–0 1–0 — +0.05
Career — 1785 128.9 — — — — -15 -5 -32 44.0% -0.51 19–27 (41%) 12–14 (46%) 98.7 +2.85 — 1864 138.0 — — — — -3 -77 -8 49.1% -0.03 56–62 (47%) 41–38 (52%) 100.8 +0.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.