H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Tanya Harford vs Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel H2H: 0-1
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel holds a 1–0 lead over Tanya Harford in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel won the 1981 Johannesburg quarterfinal 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 67
Right-Handed
162 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 59
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 1981* | Johannesburg | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | 6-2 6-1 | Tanya Harford | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tanya Harford | — | — | — | 1,786 | 50 | 71 | 41.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | — | — | — | 2,082 | 277 | 213 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tanya Harford | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 27–14 | 65.9% | — | 1,806 | 0 | 2 |
| 15 | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 30–19 | 61.2% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,844 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 1976 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,850 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 1977 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 41–16 | 71.9% | — | 1,975 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 1978 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 34–16 | 68.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1979 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1980 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,812 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1981 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 16–15 | 51.6% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1982 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | — | 1,698 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 4 |