Tanya Harford
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martina Navratilova | 0 | 8 | 8 | Jun 29, 1980 | H2H |
| Yvonne Vermaak | 3 | 2 | 5 | Jun 25, 1980 | H2H |
| Rosie Casals | 1 | 2 | 3 | Sep 2, 1982 | H2H |
| Pam Shriver | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jun 11, 1980 | H2H |
| Laura Dupont | 0 | 3 | 3 | Nov 1, 1979 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC
Tanya Harford vs Kay Mcdaniel H2H: 1-0
Tanya Harford holds a 1–0 lead over Kay Mcdaniel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tanya Harford leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tanya Harford won the 1980 Chichester round of 64 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tanya Harford | 6-1 6-0 | Kay Mcdaniel | Match data | Jun 10, 1980* | R64 | Chichester | WTA 250 | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tanya Harford | — | — | — | 1,783 | 50 | 71 | 41.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kay Mcdaniel | — | — | — | 1,653 | 18 | 41 | 30.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tanya Harford | Kay Mcdaniel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1976 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1977 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1978 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1979 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1980 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1981 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 2–13 | 13.3% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1982 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Tanya Harford | Kay Mcdaniel | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | 1974 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1975 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1976 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1977 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1978 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1979 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | — | — | — | — | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1978 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1980 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | 1979 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% |
| 22 | 1981 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1980 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 1982 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1981 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Career | — | 15 | 22 | 37 | 40.5% | 11 | 14 | 25 | 44.0% | 15 | 19 | 34 | 44.1% | 8 | 15 | 23 | 34.8% | — | 7 | 13 | 20 | 35.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 2 | 10 | 12 | 16.7% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Tanya Harford | Kay Mcdaniel | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 1974 | 1497 | 100.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | -0.14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1975 | 1479 | 94.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.26 | 1974 | 1516 | 99.4 | — | — | — | — | — | +25 | — | 57.1% | -0.28 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.34 |
| 17 | 1976 | 1512 | 106.0 | — | — | — | — | +66 | +24 | — | 44.4% | -0.61 | 0–2 | 1–0 | — | +0.58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1977 | 1559 | 123.8 | — | — | — | — | +23 | +25 | -87 | 38.3% | -0.58 | 3–4 (43%) | 1–3 (25%) | 98.8 | +0.83 | 1976 | 1498 | 99.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.67 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | 0.00 |
| 19 | 1978 | 1559 | 111.9 | — | — | — | — | +30 | — | — | 41.7% | -0.71 | 2–4 (33%) | 0–1 | — | +0.47 | 1977 | 1486 | 99.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.05 |
| 20 | 1979 | 1717 | 133.9 | — | — | — | — | -53 | — | -60 | 51.8% | -0.18 | 7–3 (70%) | 3–1 (75%) | 108.7 | +1.28 | 1978 | 1519 | 108.0 | — | — | — | — | +99 | — | — | 55.6% | +0.78 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.17 |
| 21 | 1980 | 1674 | 131.1 | — | — | — | — | -48 | — | -27 | 40.0% | -0.81 | 5–6 (45%) | 2–4 (33%) | 98.1 | -2.35 | 1979 | 1625 | 126.6 | — | — | — | — | +20 | — | +26 | 43.4% | -0.57 | 6–3 (67%) | 4–1 (80%) | 109.0 | +0.40 |
| 22 | 1981 | 1631 | 111.8 | — | — | — | — | +34 | -42 | 0 | 52.4% | +0.12 | 2–6 (25%) | 4–3 (57%) | 97.4 | +2.23 | 1980 | 1547 | 99.3 | — | — | — | — | -28 | — | +43 | 22.9% | -2.23 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–0 | — | -0.28 |
| 23 | 1982 | 1630 | 118.5 | — | — | — | — | — | -65 | +41 | 44.4% | -0.44 | 0–2 | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.08 | 1981 | 1522 | 94.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.25 | — | — | — | -0.07 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1496 | 104.3 | — | — | — | — | +12 | — | — | 40.0% | -0.30 | 0–2 | 1–1 | — | +0.49 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1480 | 96.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | — | 1–0 | — | +0.03 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 1449 | 95.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14.3% | -2.14 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.25 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1443 | 100.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | 0.00 |
| Career | — | 1784 | 129.2 | — | — | — | — | -14 | -5 | -32 | 44.0% | -0.51 | 19–27 (41%) | 12–14 (46%) | 98.7 | +2.57 | — | 1653 | 110.5 | — | — | — | — | +12 | +25 | +31 | 34.8% | -1.17 | 8–12 (40%) | 8–4 (67%) | 102.5 | +2.17 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Kay Mcdaniel
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kathleen Cummings | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jul 8, 1982 | H2H |
| Ann Kiyomura Hayashi | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jul 24, 1980 | H2H |
| Stacy Margolin | 0 | 2 | 2 | Mar 13, 1980 | H2H |
| Renata Tomanova | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jan 17, 1980 | H2H |
| Kate Latham | 1 | 1 | 2 | Feb 22, 1979 | H2H |