H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Tanya Harford vs Mima Jausovec H2H: 0-1

Mima Jausovec holds a 1–0 lead over Tanya Harford in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mima Jausovec leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mima Jausovec won the 1980 Stockholm round of 32 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tanya Harford
RSA Age 67 Right-Handed 162 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Mima Jausovec
SLO Age 70 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mima Jausovec 6-2 6-0 Tanya Harford Match data Oct 30, 1980* R32 Stockholm WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tanya Harford — — — 1,784 50 71 41.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mima Jausovec #400 #23 2 2,090 339 246 57.9% 1 0 0 1 5 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tanya Harford Mima Jausovec
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1974 0–1 0.0% — 1,496 0 0 1972 2–0 100.0% — 1,533 0 1
16 1975 0–1 0.0% — 1,479 0 0 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,560 0 1
17 1976 4–5 44.4% — 1,512 0 0 1974 18–13 58.1% — 1,793 0 1
18 1977 7–13 35.0% — 1,559 0 0 1975 16–19 45.7% — 1,833 0 1
19 1978 3–6 33.3% — 1,558 0 0 1976 33–16 67.3% — 2,004 0 4
20 1979 13–10 56.5% — 1,716 0 0 1977 32–21 60.4% — 2,010 1 5
21 1980 12–20 37.5% — 1,673 0 0 1978 29–19 60.4% — 1,947 1 6
22 1981 8–10 44.4% — 1,630 0 0 1979 32–28 53.3% — 1,870 1 6
23 1982 3–5 37.5% — 1,629 0 0 1980 34–22 60.7% — 1,945 1 6
24 — — — — — — — 1981 57–28 67.1% — 2,013 1 6
25 — — — — — — — 1982 36–24 60.0% — 1,857 1 7
26 — — — — — — — 1983 23–16 59.0% — 1,873 1 7
27 — — — — — — — 1984 12–17 41.4% #87 1,747 1 7
28 — — — — — — — 1985 9–12 42.9% #82 1,695 1 7
29 — — — — — — — 1986 2–4 33.3% #184 1,673 1 7
30 — — — — — — — 1987 1–3 25.0% #233 1,656 1 7
31 — — — — — — — 1988 1–3 25.0% #362 1,641 1 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tanya Harford Mima Jausovec
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1974 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 — — — — 2 0 2 100.0% — — — — — — — —
16 1975 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
17 1976 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
18 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1975 2 3 5 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 9 11 18.2%
19 1978 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1976 0 2 2 0.0% 21 3 24 87.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 9 18 50.0%
20 1979 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 20 6 26 76.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 11 21 47.6%
21 1980 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 5 7 12 41.7% 3 9 12 25.0% 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 9 16 43.8%
22 1981 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1979 6 7 13 46.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 16 13 29 55.2%
23 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1980 8 3 11 72.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 16 13 29 55.2%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 28 14 42 66.7%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 23 10 33 69.7%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 6 4 10 60.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 2 3 5 40.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 2 5 7 28.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
Career — 15 22 37 40.5% 11 14 25 44.0% 15 19 34 44.1% 8 15 23 34.8% — 35 43 78 44.9% 145 67 212 68.4% 42 33 75 56.0% 117 103 220 53.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tanya Harford Mima Jausovec
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1974 1497 100.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.14 1972 1533 109.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +3.75 — — — +0.55
16 1975 1479 94.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.26 1973 1561 114.8 — — — — — +38 — 57.1% +1.57 1–0 — — +0.21
17 1976 1512 106.0 — — — — +67 +25 — 44.4% -0.61 0–2 1–0 — +0.59 1974 1794 144.8 — — — — -138 -70 -107 55.2% +0.37 4–3 (57%) 4–5 (44%) 102.8 -1.90
18 1977 1559 123.8 — — — — +23 +25 -88 38.3% -0.58 3–4 (43%) 1–3 (25%) 98.8 +1.04 1975 1833 146.7 — — — — -145 +20 -114 48.1% -0.05 7–6 (54%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -1.97
19 1978 1559 111.9 — — — — +34 — — 41.7% -0.71 2–4 (33%) 0–1 — +0.55 1976 2004 156.6 — — — — -268 +60 -233 61.6% +1.23 11–5 (69%) 4–6 (40%) 104.5 -3.78
20 1979 1716 133.6 — — — — -51 — -60 51.8% -0.18 7–3 (70%) 3–1 (75%) 108.7 +1.24 1977 2011 161.6 — — — — -207 +128 -274 61.5% +0.98 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 95.6 -5.51
21 1980 1674 130.7 — — — — -52 — -27 40.0% -0.81 5–6 (45%) 2–4 (33%) 98.1 -2.35 1978 1947 147.6 — — — — -137 +161 -129 58.9% +0.51 10–5 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 100.0 -3.80
22 1981 1631 111.6 — — — — +32 -43 0 52.4% +0.12 2–6 (25%) 4–3 (57%) 97.4 +2.28 1979 1871 146.4 — — — — -10 +166 -109 54.4% +0.40 6–10 (38%) 5–5 (50%) 95.8 -0.84
23 1982 1629 118.4 — — — — — -65 +42 44.4% -0.44 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.05 1980 1945 155.9 — — — — +3 +49 -109 58.7% +0.84 6–3 (67%) 3–9 (25%) 100.1 -3.63
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 2013 157.1 — — — — 0 +4 -103 63.1% +1.07 16–11 (59%) 11–4 (73%) 104.3 -2.76
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1858 148.5 — — — — +114 +111 -66 59.3% +0.50 9–13 (41%) 9–3 (75%) 95.9 -0.56
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1874 143.9 — — — — -17 +151 -63 58.4% +0.64 5–6 (45%) 2–5 (29%) 94.5 -2.67
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1748 131.7 — — — — -27 +199 — 46.8% -0.18 1–5 (17%) 2–5 (29%) 88.9 -1.31
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1695 127.6 — — — — -21 +205 — 45.8% -0.33 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 94.8 -0.67
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1673 105.7 — — — — — +197 — 40.0% -1.80 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.18
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1656 107.2 — — — — — +179 — 40.0% -1.60 0–2 — — -0.33
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1641 110.1 — — — — — +162 — 25.0% -2.75 — — — -0.77
Career — 1785 128.9 — — — — -15 -5 -32 44.0% -0.51 19–27 (41%) 12–14 (46%) 98.7 +2.85 — 2091 156.0 — — — — -46 +105 -119 57.2% +0.57 84–85 (50%) 55–55 (50%) 94.6 -5.15

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.