H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Tanya Harford vs Mima Jausovec H2H: 0-1
Mima Jausovec holds a 1–0 lead over Tanya Harford in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mima Jausovec leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mima Jausovec won the 1980 Stockholm third round 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 67
Right-Handed
162 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SLO
Age 69
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 1980* | Stockholm | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Mima Jausovec | 6-2 6-0 | Tanya Harford | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tanya Harford | — | — | — | 1,786 | 50 | 71 | 41.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mima Jausovec | #400 | #23 | 2 | 2,088 | 339 | 246 | 57.9% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tanya Harford | Mima Jausovec | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 2–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1976 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 18–13 | 58.1% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1977 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 16–19 | 45.7% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1978 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 33–16 | 67.3% | — | 1,996 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1979 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 2,008 | 1 | 5 |
| 21 | 1980 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,922 | 1 | 6 |
| 22 | 1981 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 32–28 | 53.3% | — | 1,866 | 1 | 6 |
| 23 | 1982 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 34–22 | 60.7% | — | 1,941 | 1 | 6 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 57–28 | 67.1% | — | 2,010 | 1 | 6 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 36–24 | 60.0% | — | 1,861 | 1 | 7 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,873 | 1 | 7 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #87 | 1,747 | 1 | 7 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,695 | 1 | 7 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #184 | 1,673 | 1 | 7 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #233 | 1,656 | 1 | 7 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #362 | 1,641 | 1 | 7 |