H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Tanya Harford vs Stacy Margolin H2H: 0-2
Stacy Margolin holds a 2–0 lead over Tanya Harford in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Stacy Margolin leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Stacy Margolin won the 1980 Seattle third round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 67
Right-Handed
162 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
Age 67
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 1980* | Seattle | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Stacy Margolin | 6-1 6-1 | Tanya Harford | Match data |
| Aug 31, 1979* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Stacy Margolin | 6-3 6-1 | Tanya Harford | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tanya Harford | — | — | — | 1,786 | 50 | 71 | 41.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Stacy Margolin | — | — | — | 1,855 | 73 | 98 | 42.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tanya Harford | Stacy Margolin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1976 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1977 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1978 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 16–5 | 76.2% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1979 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1980 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 25–26 | 49.0% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1981 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,700 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1982 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 4–14 | 22.2% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 4 |