H2H data updated: 2026-11-06 00:00 UTC

Tathiana Garbin vs Edina Gallovits Hall H2H: 1-0

Tathiana Garbin holds a 1–0 lead over Edina Gallovits Hall in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tathiana Garbin leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tathiana Garbin won the 2009 Palermo round of 32 6-4 7-5.

ITA Age 49 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
ROU Age 41 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tathiana Garbin #66 6-4 7-5 Edina Gallovits Hall Match data Jul 16, 2009* R32 Palermo International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tathiana Garbin — #22 1,255 1,741 171 210 44.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Edina Gallovits Hall — — — 1,640 50 80 38.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tathiana Garbin Edina Gallovits Hall
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2002 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2003 0–1 0.0% — 1,490 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2004 0–3 0.0% — 1,468 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2005 0–4 0.0% — 1,439 0 0
21 1998 1–4 20.0% #121 1,476 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1999 5–9 35.7% #126 1,467 0 0 2007 9–12 42.9% — 1,466 0 0
23 2000 23–20 53.5% #42 1,619 0 1 2008 13–14 48.1% — 1,570 0 0
24 2001 13–19 40.6% #91 1,575 0 1 2009 10–15 40.0% — 1,556 0 0
25 2002 18–17 51.4% #71 1,600 0 1 2010 9–9 50.0% — 1,610 0 0
26 2003 12–17 41.4% #82 1,556 0 1 2011 2–9 18.2% — 1,514 0 0
27 2004 12–19 38.7% #58 1,547 0 1 2012 6–8 42.9% — 1,528 0 0
28 2005 13–19 40.6% #85 1,559 0 1 2013 0–2 0.0% — 1,518 0 0
29 2006 15–15 50.0% #38 1,627 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2007 23–17 57.5% #36 1,670 0 1 2015 0–2 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
31 2008 14–20 41.2% #55 1,567 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2009 13–16 44.8% #59 1,608 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2010 9–17 34.6% #87 1,580 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2011 0–1 0.0% — 1,574 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tathiana Garbin Edina Gallovits Hall
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1998 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1999 2 3 5 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2007 2 7 9 22.2% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2000 4 9 13 30.8% 19 9 28 67.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 5 6 11 45.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 2001 6 7 13 46.2% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 4 7 11 36.4% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2002 7 8 15 46.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 3 5 8 37.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 2003 7 9 16 43.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 0 4 4 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2004 8 13 21 38.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2012 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2005 6 12 18 33.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 7 8 15 46.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 10 7 17 58.8% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2015 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2008 8 9 17 47.1% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 5 8 13 38.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 73 101 174 42.0% 92 90 182 50.5% 3 13 16 18.8% 3 6 9 33.3% — 16 37 53 30.2% 32 35 67 47.8% 2 8 10 20.0% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 128/252 of Tathiana Garbin's and 95/125 of Edina Gallovits Hall's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tathiana Garbin Edina Gallovits Hall
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 1/1 0.0 4.0 66.7% 30.0% 33.3% 36.4% 25.0% 31.1% 41.3%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 1/4 0.0 0.0 65.3% 51.1% 44.0% 60.0% 50.0% 48.6% 40.0%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 12/21 0.9 1.9 65.8% 55.9% 45.7% 42.6% 40.3% 52.6% 43.1%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 20/27 1.0 2.7 69.1% 59.1% 44.2% 43.3% 43.0% 54.7% 42.3%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 17/25 0.5 2.5 66.2% 55.4% 42.8% 35.6% 40.4% 50.7% 41.1%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 16/18 1.0 2.6 67.5% 59.4% 44.7% 56.6% 50.3% 54.3% 43.3%
26 2003 5/29 3.4 4.4 53.6% 65.0% 41.0% 38.8% 27.4% 54.0% 42.0% 2011 11/11 0.8 2.9 61.7% 57.7% 45.0% 48.9% 41.4% 52.6% 38.9%
27 2004 6/31 2.5 4.3 55.7% 66.8% 48.1% 48.7% 54.3% 58.8% 47.4% 2012 13/14 1.1 3.0 64.9% 55.6% 47.1% 44.8% 37.1% 52.8% 43.8%
28 2005 4/32 2.5 4.5 61.4% 59.3% 46.1% 56.8% 43.1% 54.3% 41.9% 2013 2/2 0.0 8.0 48.1% 44.0% 24.7% 38.9% 33.3% 33.7% 28.3%
29 2006 13/30 2.4 1.8 59.3% 57.9% 42.6% 47.5% 50.7% 51.9% 42.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 25/40 1.7 2.2 63.8% 59.2% 45.7% 47.8% 43.4% 54.4% 44.5% 2015 2/2 1.0 5.5 64.5% 52.9% 45.9% 43.8% 31.3% 50.1% 33.8%
31 2008 29/34 1.8 3.2 60.8% 59.0% 43.8% 47.8% 44.7% 52.8% 42.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 23/29 1.8 2.4 62.1% 59.4% 43.7% 56.0% 51.1% 53.5% 45.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 22/26 2.2 2.0 62.9% 56.2% 42.1% 50.0% 38.2% 51.0% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 1/1 3.0 0.0 54.3% 31.6% 18.8% 14.3% 0.0% 25.7% 23.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 128/381 2.0 2.6 61.3% 58.9% 43.7% 49.3% 44.4% 53.0% 42.9% — 95/130 0.9 2.7 65.9% 56.6% 44.2% 45.0% 42.0% 52.3% 41.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tathiana Garbin Edina Gallovits Hall
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1498 102.4 — — — — — — — 60.0% +1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.29
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1491 97.5 +0.73 +1.48 0.600 36.3% — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.05
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1468 96.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.83 — — — -0.36
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1439 103.6 +0.73 -0.75 0.778 44.7% +49 — — 20.0% -2.60 0–2 — — -0.49
21 1998 1476 99.1 — — — — — +30 — 33.3% -1.50 0–2 1–0 — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1999 1468 104.0 — — — — +69 +4 — 40.0% -0.57 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.8 +1.10 2007 1466 110.0 -2.61 -1.75 0.910 48.0% -49 +144 — 47.6% -0.10 2–4 (33%) 0–1 — +0.80
23 2000 1620 130.4 — — — — -94 +73 — 50.5% +0.20 9–4 (69%) 6–6 (50%) 106.4 -0.40 2008 1571 123.2 -0.46 -1.71 0.934 48.9% -87 +66 — 43.4% -0.25 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 102.0 -0.81
24 2001 1575 127.1 — — — — -22 +73 — 46.3% -0.06 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 97.7 +0.37 2009 1557 111.7 -2.93 -2.15 0.835 46.1% -49 +63 — 39.3% -0.95 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — -0.19
25 2002 1600 121.8 — — — — -44 +115 — 51.3% -0.01 5–5 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 101.1 +0.83 2010 1611 117.0 0.00 -0.02 0.947 49.1% -91 +66 — 46.5% -0.02 5–2 (71%) 0–1 — +0.01
26 2003 1557 111.2 -0.57 -0.84 0.912 47.5% -9 +64 — 45.5% -0.44 6–6 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 101.4 +0.93 2011 1515 99.1 -2.49 -3.10 0.821 45.9% -41 +110 — 29.6% -1.52 1–4 (20%) 2–0 — +0.42
27 2004 1547 122.1 +1.14 +0.66 1.149 53.5% +2 +76 — 42.9% -0.27 2–10 (17%) 3–7 (30%) 88.3 -0.03 2012 1529 107.3 -1.22 -1.02 0.927 48.4% -36 +83 — 43.8% -0.72 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +0.26
28 2005 1559 119.9 -0.38 -1.30 0.916 48.0% -30 +111 — 43.5% -0.46 3–4 (43%) 5–5 (50%) 98.7 +0.08 2013 1518 103.7 -0.63 +3.58 0.427 31.0% — — — 0.0% -5.25 — — — -0.41
29 2006 1628 120.2 -2.20 -1.76 0.884 47.4% -84 +99 — 51.4% -0.03 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 100.7 +0.63 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 1670 125.7 -1.15 -0.11 0.977 49.1% -47 +107 -199 57.5% +0.45 6–2 (75%) 4–2 (67%) 106.3 +2.40 2015 1493 93.2 -1.08 -3.59 0.676 43.0% — — — 20.0% -2.80 0–1 1–0 — +0.08
31 2008 1568 113.7 -2.43 -1.04 0.900 47.7% +55 +60 — 44.9% -0.54 5–7 (42%) 3–1 (75%) 98.6 -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 1608 121.1 -1.22 +0.36 0.971 49.5% -20 +74 — 50.0% -0.10 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 97.9 -0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 1580 121.1 -2.83 -2.13 0.801 45.3% +27 +33 — 33.3% -1.42 6–2 (75%) 3–2 (60%) 106.0 -1.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 1574 96.6 +1.82 +1.60 0.317 24.6% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1742 125.6 -1.67 -0.77 0.912 48.0% -20 +77 -199 46.8% -0.25 53–60 (47%) 42–36 (54%) 102.3 +0.85 — 1641 114.5 -1.43 -1.46 0.874 47.2% -54 +86 — 39.6% -0.79 16–19 (46%) 8–5 (62%) 102.9 -0.35

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.