H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Tathiana Garbin vs Elena Bovina H2H: 0-2
Elena Bovina holds a 2–0 lead over Tathiana Garbin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Elena Bovina leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elena Bovina won the 2005 Roland Garros second round 6-1 1-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 49
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
189 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2005* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Elena Bovina | 6-1 1-6 6-4 | Tathiana Garbin | Match data |
| Jan 4, 2003* | Gold Coast | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Elena Bovina | 6-1 2-6 6-4 | Tathiana Garbin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tathiana Garbin | #86 | #22 | 1,255 | 1,710 | 167 | 207 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Elena Bovina | #777 | #14 | 1,758 | 1,960 | 127 | 110 | 53.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tathiana Garbin | Elena Bovina | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #133 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #49 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #26 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #21 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1998 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #121 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #15 | 1,951 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1999 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #126 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #61 | 1,908 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2000 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #42 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1431 | 1,862 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2001 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #91 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #329 | 1,757 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2002 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #71 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #186 | 1,756 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2003 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #82 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #210 | 1,728 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2004 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #58 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #162 | 1,653 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2005 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #85 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #301 | 1,599 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2006 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2007 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #36 | 1,647 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2008 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #55 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2009 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #59 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2010 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #87 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #86 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |