H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Tathiana Garbin vs Eleni Daniilidou H2H: 3-2

Tathiana Garbin holds a 3–2 lead over Eleni Daniilidou in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Tathiana Garbin leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Eleni Daniilidou leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tathiana Garbin won the 2008 Australian Open first round 6-2 6-2.

ITA Age 49 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3 2
5 main-draw meetings
GRE Age 43 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tathiana Garbin #40 6-2 6-2 Eleni Daniilidou #36 Match data Jan 16, 2008* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Eleni Daniilidou #58 6-3 4-6 6-1 Tathiana Garbin #64 Match data Mar 24, 2005* R128 Miami Open Tier I modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Tathiana Garbin #84 7-5 2-0 (ret.) Eleni Daniilidou #22 Match data Jan 15, 2004* R32 Hobart International Tier V modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Eleni Daniilidou #14 6-0 4-6 6-2 Tathiana Garbin #95 Match data May 29, 2003* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Tathiana Garbin #83 2-6 6-3 6-4 Eleni Daniilidou #64 Match data Feb 15, 2002* R16 Qatar Open Tier III modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tathiana Garbin #86 #22 1,255 1,726 168 209 44.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Eleni Daniilidou #1,070 #14 1,639 1,878 187 206 47.6% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tathiana Garbin Eleni Daniilidou
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2000 0–1 0.0% #314 1,490 0 0
18 2001 5–8 38.5% #81 1,499 0 0
19 2002 32–22 59.3% #22 1,778 0 1
20 2003 32–24 57.1% #26 1,706 0 2
21 1998 1–4 20.0% #121 1,476 0 0 2004 23–20 53.5% #34 1,716 0 3
22 1999 5–9 35.7% #126 1,467 0 0 2005 14–20 41.2% #69 1,648 0 3
23 2000 23–20 53.5% #42 1,619 0 1 2006 27–24 52.9% #36 1,722 0 4
24 2001 13–19 40.6% #91 1,575 0 1 2007 27–29 48.2% #42 1,720 0 4
25 2002 18–17 51.4% #71 1,600 0 1 2008 8–9 47.1% #144 1,667 0 5
26 2003 12–17 41.4% #82 1,556 0 1 2009 0–1 0.0% #157 1,646 0 5
27 2004 12–19 38.7% #58 1,547 0 1 2010 2–3 40.0% #165 1,640 0 5
28 2005 13–19 40.6% #85 1,559 0 1 2011 6–12 33.3% #90 1,553 0 5
29 2006 15–15 50.0% #38 1,627 0 1 2012 8–21 27.6% #100 1,479 0 5
30 2007 20–16 55.6% #36 1,658 0 1 2013 3–10 23.1% #186 1,427 0 5
31 2008 14–20 41.2% #55 1,564 0 1 2014 0–2 0.0% #414 1,409 0 5
32 2009 13–16 44.8% #59 1,607 0 1
33 2010 9–17 34.6% #87 1,579 0 1
34 2011 0–1 0.0% #86 1,573 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tathiana Garbin Eleni Daniilidou
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2000 0 1 1 0.0%
18 2001 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
19 2002 14 11 25 56.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 11 2 13 84.6% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 2003 17 13 30 56.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 1998 1 4 5 20.0% 2004 21 12 33 63.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1999 2 3 5 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 2005 7 12 19 36.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2000 4 9 13 30.8% 19 9 28 67.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 20 15 35 57.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1%
24 2001 6 7 13 46.2% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 19 18 37 51.4% 4 7 11 36.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2002 7 8 15 46.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 7 8 15 46.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2003 7 9 16 43.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2004 8 13 21 38.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2005 6 12 18 33.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 4 8 12 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 2006 7 8 15 46.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2012 7 13 20 35.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 2007 7 6 13 53.8% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2013 3 9 12 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2008 8 9 17 47.1% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 2009 5 8 13 38.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
33 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
34 2011 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 70 100 170 41.2% 92 90 182 50.5% 3 13 16 18.8% 3 6 9 33.3% 124 127 251 49.4% 26 46 72 36.1% 31 24 55 56.4% 6 9 15 40.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 128/248 of Tathiana Garbin's and 168/325 of Eleni Daniilidou's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tathiana Garbin Eleni Daniilidou
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 —/— 2003 6/56 1.3 5.2 66.6% 63.7% 40.6% 60.1% 43.4% 55.8% 44.2%
21 —/— 2004 8/43 1.8 5.9 69.5% 64.1% 42.1% 62.4% 44.6% 57.6% 47.8%
22 —/— 2005 9/34 1.3 5.6 65.2% 58.9% 42.6% 44.5% 44.1% 52.2% 43.3%
23 —/— 2006 19/51 0.8 5.1 69.1% 60.0% 46.4% 42.5% 48.0% 56.0% 46.7%
24 —/— 2007 51/56 0.7 5.7 69.8% 59.2% 38.2% 50.7% 51.7% 52.8% 44.3%
25 —/— 2008 14/17 1.2 4.9 64.4% 57.6% 32.9% 33.2% 66.8% 48.9% 42.0%
26 2003 5/29 3.4 4.4 53.6% 65.0% 41.0% 38.8% 27.4% 54.0% 42.0% 2009 1/1 1.0 2.0 61.6% 49.1% 48.5% 27.3% 66.7% 48.8% 46.8%
27 2004 6/31 2.5 4.3 55.7% 66.8% 48.1% 48.7% 54.3% 58.8% 47.4% 2010 5/5 1.6 5.6 63.1% 59.9% 46.5% 49.4% 39.8% 54.8% 42.1%
28 2005 4/32 2.5 4.5 61.4% 59.3% 46.1% 56.8% 43.1% 54.3% 41.9% 2011 16/18 0.8 5.9 64.1% 59.1% 41.2% 46.5% 45.1% 52.4% 44.0%
29 2006 13/30 2.4 1.8 59.3% 57.9% 42.6% 47.5% 50.7% 51.9% 42.5% 2012 26/29 1.5 5.7 64.5% 58.1% 41.4% 45.5% 40.1% 52.2% 39.0%
30 2007 25/36 1.7 2.2 63.8% 59.2% 45.7% 47.8% 43.4% 54.4% 44.5% 2013 11/13 1.6 8.9 65.2% 59.8% 31.4% 48.6% 32.2% 49.8% 39.0%
31 2008 29/34 1.8 3.2 60.8% 59.0% 43.8% 47.8% 44.7% 52.8% 42.5% 2014 2/2 0.0 6.5 71.6% 53.6% 16.9% 27.3% 41.7% 43.1% 38.2%
32 2009 23/29 1.8 2.4 62.1% 59.4% 43.7% 56.0% 51.1% 53.5% 45.1% —/—
33 2010 22/26 2.2 2.0 62.9% 56.2% 42.1% 50.0% 38.2% 51.0% 39.3% —/—
34 2011 1/1 3.0 0.0 54.3% 31.6% 18.8% 14.3% 0.0% 25.7% 23.5% —/—
Career 128/377 2.0 2.6 61.3% 58.9% 43.7% 49.3% 44.5% 53.0% 42.9% 168/393 1.1 5.8 67.0% 59.3% 39.6% 47.1% 47.4% 52.7% 43.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tathiana Garbin Eleni Daniilidou
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2000 1491 97.7 0.0% -3.50 +0.02
18 2001 1500 107.9 +36 -22 +106 40.0% -0.37 2–2 (50%) 0–2 +0.52
19 2002 1778 141.4 -106 -221 +113 58.6% +0.69 9–11 (45%) 5–6 (45%) 100.1 -1.37
20 2003 1706 136.7 +0.41 +0.45 1.001 50.0% +5 -93 +150 56.7% +0.20 7–8 (47%) 10–2 (83%) 102.0 +1.38
21 1998 1476 99.1 +30 33.3% -1.50 0–2 1–0 +0.11 2004 1717 141.0 +1.29 +1.68 1.128 52.6% +42 -116 55.9% +0.45 7–6 (54%) 6–4 (60%) 101.4 +1.59
22 1999 1468 104.0 +69 +4 40.0% -0.57 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.8 +1.10 2005 1648 126.9 -1.18 +0.37 0.906 47.8% +10 -104 +191 44.2% -0.49 7–6 (54%) 3–5 (38%) 97.5 -2.10
23 2000 1619 130.4 -93 +74 50.5% +0.20 9–4 (69%) 6–6 (50%) 106.4 -0.40 2006 1723 136.1 +0.35 +1.65 1.061 51.1% +25 -187 +90 54.0% +0.18 8–9 (47%) 3–4 (43%) 97.2 -2.71
24 2001 1575 127.1 -22 +73 46.3% -0.06 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 97.7 +0.37 2007 1720 130.6 -2.20 +0.32 0.938 48.6% +11 -224 +88 47.2% -0.16 13–10 (57%) 9–6 (60%) 104.4 +0.19
25 2002 1600 121.8 -44 +115 51.3% -0.01 5–5 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 101.1 +0.83 2008 1668 121.0 -3.18 -0.53 0.821 46.1% -1 46.7% -0.50 2–0 1–2 (33%) -0.67
26 2003 1557 111.2 -0.57 -0.84 0.912 47.5% -9 +64 45.5% -0.44 6–6 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 101.4 +0.92 2009 1647 100.7 +1.13 +0.09 0.915 47.9% 33.3% -1.00 0–1 +0.05
27 2004 1547 122.1 +1.14 +0.66 1.149 53.5% +2 +76 42.9% -0.27 2–10 (17%) 3–7 (30%) 88.3 -0.03 2010 1641 109.4 -1.18 -1.96 0.933 48.3% +16 40.0% -0.70 1–0 -0.22
28 2005 1559 119.9 -0.38 -1.30 0.916 48.0% -30 +111 43.5% -0.46 3–4 (43%) 5–5 (50%) 98.7 +0.08 2011 1554 103.4 -2.59 +0.59 0.925 48.1% +34 -96 38.1% -0.95 2–4 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 98.9 +0.84
29 2006 1628 120.2 -2.20 -1.76 0.884 47.4% -84 +99 51.4% -0.03 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 100.7 +0.63 2012 1479 112.0 -2.35 -3.57 0.817 45.6% +54 -42 +181 33.3% -1.22 4–5 (44%) 2–1 (67%) +0.19
30 2007 1659 123.9 -0.97 -0.08 0.977 49.1% -68 +117 -189 54.8% +0.26 5–2 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 105.3 +2.93 2013 1428 100.8 -3.67 -2.11 0.776 44.5% +39 28.1% -1.81 3–3 (50%) 1–1 +0.45
31 2008 1564 113.6 -2.43 -1.04 0.900 47.7% +44 +64 44.9% -0.54 5–7 (42%) 3–1 (75%) 98.8 -0.12 2014 1409 94.6 -1.70 -2.31 0.671 40.6% 0.0% -3.00 +0.03
32 2009 1607 121.1 -1.22 +0.36 0.971 49.5% -29 +75 50.0% -0.10 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 98.0 -0.47
33 2010 1580 121.0 -2.83 -2.13 0.801 45.3% +22 +32 33.3% -1.42 6–2 (75%) 3–2 (60%) 106.1 -1.97
34 2011 1573 96.6 +1.82 +1.60 0.317 24.6% 0.0% -6.00 -0.20
Career 1726 125.4 -1.64 -0.76 0.912 48.0% -23 +78 -189 46.5% -0.27 52–60 (46%) 41–35 (54%) 102.2 +1.01 1878 134.3 -1.78 -0.36 0.913 48.0% +9 -146 +126 48.9% -0.13 64–65 (50%) 44–34 (56%) 102.2 -0.46

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.