H2H data updated: 2026-11-06 00:00 UTC

Tathiana Garbin vs Emilie Loit H2H: 0-1

Emilie Loit holds a 1–0 lead over Tathiana Garbin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Emilie Loit leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Emilie Loit won the 2001 Budapest round of 16 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tathiana Garbin
ITA Age 49 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Emilie Loit
FRA Age 47 Left-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Emilie Loit #89 6-4 6-3 Tathiana Garbin #51 Match data Apr 20, 2001* R16 Budapest Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tathiana Garbin — #22 1,255 1,741 171 210 44.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Emilie Loit — #27 1,016 1,779 162 180 47.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tathiana Garbin Emilie Loit
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1997 0–1 0.0% #243 1,498 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1998 3–5 37.5% #96 1,512 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1999 3–15 16.7% #101 1,424 0 0
21 1998 1–4 20.0% #121 1,476 0 0 2000 4–6 40.0% #101 1,457 0 0
22 1999 5–9 35.7% #126 1,467 0 0 2001 12–15 44.4% #95 1,547 0 0
23 2000 23–20 53.5% #42 1,619 0 1 2002 19–17 52.8% #58 1,625 0 0
24 2001 13–19 40.6% #91 1,575 0 1 2003 23–24 48.9% #41 1,673 0 0
25 2002 18–17 51.4% #71 1,600 0 1 2004 29–20 59.2% #45 1,668 0 2
26 2003 12–17 41.4% #82 1,556 0 1 2005 15–20 42.9% #82 1,548 0 2
27 2004 12–19 38.7% #58 1,547 0 1 2006 20–16 55.6% #56 1,622 0 2
28 2005 13–19 40.6% #85 1,559 0 1 2007 26–22 54.2% #43 1,618 0 3
29 2006 15–15 50.0% #38 1,627 0 1 2008 5–15 25.0% #137 1,518 0 3
30 2007 23–17 57.5% #36 1,670 0 1 2009 3–4 42.9% — 1,533 0 3
31 2008 14–20 41.2% #55 1,567 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2009 13–16 44.8% #59 1,608 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2010 9–17 34.6% #87 1,580 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2011 0–1 0.0% — 1,574 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tathiana Garbin Emilie Loit
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 3 6 9 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 1998 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1999 2 3 5 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2001 4 6 10 40.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 2000 4 9 13 30.8% 19 9 28 67.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 6 7 13 46.2% 12 8 20 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2001 6 7 13 46.2% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 10 11 21 47.6% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 2002 7 8 15 46.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2004 6 11 17 35.3% 19 5 24 79.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2003 7 9 16 43.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 4 9 13 30.8% 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2004 8 13 21 38.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2006 5 8 13 38.5% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
28 2005 6 12 18 33.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 9 11 20 45.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 2006 7 8 15 46.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 1 7 8 12.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2007 10 7 17 58.8% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
31 2008 8 9 17 47.1% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 5 8 13 38.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 73 101 174 42.0% 92 90 182 50.5% 3 13 16 18.8% 3 6 9 33.3% — 51 80 131 38.9% 94 72 166 56.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 7 14 21 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 128/252 of Tathiana Garbin's and 84/242 of Emilie Loit's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tathiana Garbin Emilie Loit
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 8/47 1.3 2.4 62.2% 65.0% 52.9% 56.7% 36.8% 60.6% 43.0%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 4/49 1.5 3.0 58.5% 60.4% 45.6% 43.3% 45.3% 54.9% 39.2%
26 2003 5/29 3.4 4.4 53.6% 65.0% 41.0% 38.8% 27.4% 54.0% 42.0% 2005 5/35 1.4 3.0 52.1% 67.1% 43.2% 51.3% 48.2% 56.1% 48.6%
27 2004 6/31 2.5 4.3 55.7% 66.8% 48.1% 48.7% 54.3% 58.8% 47.4% 2006 15/36 2.3 2.4 63.3% 58.3% 46.8% 55.7% 48.5% 54.0% 45.5%
28 2005 4/32 2.5 4.5 61.4% 59.3% 46.1% 56.8% 43.1% 54.3% 41.9% 2007 31/48 1.8 3.0 64.1% 60.0% 45.7% 50.1% 49.0% 54.5% 45.5%
29 2006 13/30 2.4 1.8 59.3% 57.9% 42.6% 47.5% 50.7% 51.9% 42.5% 2008 15/20 2.0 2.9 66.4% 55.8% 37.9% 40.8% 41.0% 49.6% 39.2%
30 2007 25/40 1.7 2.2 63.8% 59.2% 45.7% 47.8% 43.4% 54.4% 44.5% 2009 6/7 2.7 3.5 62.6% 63.4% 43.1% 51.0% 60.7% 55.4% 40.8%
31 2008 29/34 1.8 3.2 60.8% 59.0% 43.8% 47.8% 44.7% 52.8% 42.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 23/29 1.8 2.4 62.1% 59.4% 43.7% 56.0% 51.1% 53.5% 45.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 22/26 2.2 2.0 62.9% 56.2% 42.1% 50.0% 38.2% 51.0% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 1/1 3.0 0.0 54.3% 31.6% 18.8% 14.3% 0.0% 25.7% 23.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 128/381 2.0 2.6 61.3% 58.9% 43.7% 49.3% 44.4% 53.0% 42.9% — 84/342 1.9 2.9 63.1% 60.1% 44.8% 49.9% 47.0% 54.3% 43.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tathiana Garbin Emilie Loit
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1499 112.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.22
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1512 121.9 — — — — +45 +20 — 44.4% -0.11 0–2 0–1 — +0.24
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1424 101.4 — — — — +104 +28 — 26.2% -1.86 1–5 (17%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.55
21 1998 1476 99.1 — — — — — +30 — 33.3% -1.50 0–2 1–0 — +0.11 2000 1458 109.0 — — — — +67 +11 — 45.8% -0.12 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — +0.50
22 1999 1468 104.0 — — — — +69 +4 — 40.0% -0.57 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.8 +1.10 2001 1547 113.0 — — — — -32 -21 — 44.3% -0.61 4–5 (44%) 2–2 (50%) 99.5 +0.79
23 2000 1620 130.4 — — — — -94 +73 — 50.5% +0.20 9–4 (69%) 6–6 (50%) 106.4 -0.40 2002 1626 113.6 — — — — -91 +30 — 52.4% -0.04 10–6 (63%) 4–3 (57%) 106.6 +0.19
24 2001 1575 127.1 — — — — -22 +73 — 46.3% -0.06 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 97.7 +0.37 2003 1673 132.7 +2.59 +0.21 1.090 51.0% -71 +43 -104 49.1% -0.05 10–8 (56%) 5–5 (50%) 104.6 -1.57
25 2002 1600 121.8 — — — — -44 +115 — 51.3% -0.01 5–5 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 101.1 +0.83 2004 1668 124.9 -0.94 -1.99 0.870 46.7% -119 +171 -41 59.8% +0.45 9–6 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 102.5 +1.06
26 2003 1557 111.2 -0.57 -0.84 0.912 47.5% -9 +64 — 45.5% -0.44 6–6 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 101.4 +0.93 2005 1549 112.1 -0.35 +0.26 1.107 52.4% -55 +179 — 48.8% -0.19 3–9 (25%) 4–3 (57%) 93.9 +1.69
27 2004 1547 122.1 +1.14 +0.66 1.149 53.5% +2 +76 — 42.9% -0.27 2–10 (17%) 3–7 (30%) 88.3 -0.03 2006 1622 125.1 -1.55 +0.33 0.990 50.1% -86 +130 — 55.7% +0.60 5–4 (56%) 5–8 (38%) 100.0 +1.39
28 2005 1559 119.9 -0.38 -1.30 0.916 48.0% -30 +111 — 43.5% -0.46 3–4 (43%) 5–5 (50%) 98.7 +0.08 2007 1619 129.8 -0.93 +0.96 1.001 50.0% -39 +142 — 55.4% +0.37 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 104.3 -0.08
29 2006 1628 120.2 -2.20 -1.76 0.884 47.4% -84 +99 — 51.4% -0.03 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 100.7 +0.63 2008 1519 106.1 -4.05 -3.45 0.777 44.3% -3 +120 — 30.2% -1.60 2–3 (40%) 3–5 (38%) 97.4 -0.29
30 2007 1670 125.7 -1.15 -0.11 0.977 49.1% -47 +107 -199 57.5% +0.45 6–2 (75%) 4–2 (67%) 106.3 +2.40 2009 1534 118.8 +0.06 -0.68 0.916 48.8% +32 +64 — 44.4% -0.39 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +0.07
31 2008 1568 113.7 -2.43 -1.04 0.900 47.7% +55 +60 — 44.9% -0.54 5–7 (42%) 3–1 (75%) 98.6 -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 1608 121.1 -1.22 +0.36 0.971 49.5% -20 +74 — 50.0% -0.10 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 97.9 -0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 1580 121.1 -2.83 -2.13 0.801 45.3% +27 +33 — 33.3% -1.42 6–2 (75%) 3–2 (60%) 106.0 -1.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 1574 96.6 +1.82 +1.60 0.317 24.6% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1742 125.6 -1.67 -0.77 0.912 48.0% -20 +77 -199 46.8% -0.25 53–60 (47%) 42–36 (54%) 102.3 +0.85 — 1780 125.3 -1.16 -0.31 0.956 49.0% -45 +99 -67 49.4% -0.12 54–58 (48%) 34–43 (44%) 98.9 +1.27

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.