H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Tathiana Garbin vs Iroda Tulyaganova H2H: 0-1
Iroda Tulyaganova holds a 1–0 lead over Tathiana Garbin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Iroda Tulyaganova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Iroda Tulyaganova won the 2002 Rome second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 49
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
UZB
Age 44
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2002* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Iroda Tulyaganova | 6-3 6-2 | Tathiana Garbin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tathiana Garbin | #86 | #22 | 1,255 | 1,710 | 167 | 207 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Iroda Tulyaganova | #862 | #16 | 1,349 | 1,820 | 93 | 80 | 53.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tathiana Garbin | Iroda Tulyaganova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #186 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #75 | 1,578 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #20 | 1,719 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #55 | 1,654 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1998 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #121 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #50 | 1,734 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1999 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #126 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #550 | 1,722 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2000 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #42 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #371 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2001 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #91 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 7–2 | 77.8% | #131 | 1,719 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2002 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #71 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #318 | 1,644 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2003 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #82 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #728 | 1,633 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2004 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #58 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #85 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2007 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #36 | 1,647 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2008 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #55 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2009 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #59 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2010 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #87 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #86 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |