H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Tathiana Garbin vs Justine Henin H2H: 2-2

Tathiana Garbin and Justine Henin are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Justine Henin leads 2–1 on clay, while Tathiana Garbin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Justine Henin won the 2006 Roland Garros third round 6-4 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tathiana Garbin
ITA Age 49 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main-draw meetings
Justine Henin
BEL Age 44 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Justine Henin #5 6-4 6-0 Tathiana Garbin #72 Match data Jun 3, 2006* R32 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Tathiana Garbin #86 7-5 6-4 Justine Henin #1 Match data May 27, 2004* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Justine Henin #9 6-3 6-3 Tathiana Garbin #95 Match data Apr 12, 2002* R16 Amelia Island Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Tathiana Garbin #50 6-3 6-1 Justine Henin #20 Match data Mar 24, 2001* R32 Miami Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tathiana Garbin #86 #22 1,255 1,726 168 209 44.6% 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
Justine Henin #13 #1 7,626 2,393 448 102 81.5% 7 1 10 2 18 5 43

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tathiana Garbin Justine Henin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1999 11–6 64.7% #69 1,655 0 1
18 — — — — — — — 2000 17–13 56.7% #45 1,749 0 1
19 — — — — — — — 2001 56–18 75.7% #7 1,984 0 4
20 — — — — — — — 2002 50–21 70.4% #5 2,003 0 6
21 1998 1–4 20.0% #121 1,476 0 0 2003 73–11 86.9% #1 2,211 2 14
22 1999 5–9 35.7% #126 1,467 0 0 2004 36–4 90.0% #8 2,222 3 19
23 2000 23–20 53.5% #42 1,619 0 1 2005 34–5 87.2% #6 2,214 4 23
24 2001 13–19 40.6% #91 1,575 0 1 2006 57–8 87.7% #1 2,287 5 29
25 2002 18–17 51.4% #71 1,600 0 1 2007 63–4 94.0% #1 2,383 7 39
26 2003 12–17 41.4% #82 1,556 0 1 2008 17–4 81.0% #1 2,287 7 41
27 2004 12–19 38.7% #58 1,547 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 2005 13–19 40.6% #85 1,559 0 1 2010 32–7 82.1% #12 2,206 7 43
29 2006 15–15 50.0% #38 1,627 0 1 2011 2–1 66.7% #13 2,181 7 43
30 2007 20–16 55.6% #36 1,658 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2008 14–20 41.2% #55 1,564 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2009 13–16 44.8% #59 1,607 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2010 9–17 34.6% #87 1,579 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2011 0–1 0.0% #86 1,573 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tathiana Garbin Justine Henin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 2 2 4 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 11 7 18 61.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 31 11 42 73.8% 14 4 18 77.8% 10 1 11 90.9% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 23 12 35 65.7% 14 4 18 77.8% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 3 9 66.7%
21 1998 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 40 6 46 87.0% 20 1 21 95.2% 8 2 10 80.0% 5 2 7 71.4%
22 1999 2 3 5 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2004 32 2 34 94.1% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — —
23 2000 4 9 13 30.8% 19 9 28 67.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 10 4 14 71.4% 24 0 24 100.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2001 6 7 13 46.2% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 33 5 38 86.8% 14 2 16 87.5% 10 1 11 90.9% — — — —
25 2002 7 8 15 46.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 38 1 39 97.4% 14 1 15 93.3% 9 1 10 90.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 2003 7 9 16 43.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 16 3 19 84.2% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2004 8 13 21 38.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 6 12 18 33.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 16 4 20 80.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — —
29 2006 7 8 15 46.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 7 6 13 53.8% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 8 9 17 47.1% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 5 8 13 38.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 70 100 170 41.2% 92 90 182 50.5% 3 13 16 18.8% 3 6 9 33.3% — 254 58 312 81.4% 122 21 143 85.3% 53 11 64 82.8% 19 12 31 61.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 128/248 of Tathiana Garbin's and 228/358 of Justine Henin's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tathiana Garbin Justine Henin
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 20/84 2.5 3.4 53.3% 73.0% 53.7% 58.7% 56.5% 63.9% 51.6%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 13/40 3.0 5.3 50.1% 69.4% 51.2% 59.1% 54.8% 60.1% 51.6%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 16/39 2.2 6.5 50.6% 71.0% 42.7% 61.1% 54.0% 56.9% 52.3%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 56/65 2.5 4.0 56.8% 71.5% 52.9% 51.3% 54.5% 63.4% 53.1%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 64/67 3.1 4.0 55.3% 72.7% 52.5% 57.6% 54.0% 63.7% 50.9%
26 2003 5/29 3.4 4.4 53.6% 65.0% 41.0% 38.8% 27.4% 54.0% 42.0% 2008 18/21 3.2 4.8 50.9% 69.9% 48.1% 63.5% 48.4% 59.0% 47.9%
27 2004 6/31 2.5 4.3 55.7% 66.8% 48.1% 48.7% 54.3% 58.8% 47.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 4/32 2.5 4.5 61.4% 59.3% 46.1% 56.8% 43.1% 54.3% 41.9% 2010 38/39 3.7 4.9 55.6% 71.7% 51.6% 54.2% 53.7% 62.9% 47.0%
29 2006 13/30 2.4 1.8 59.3% 57.9% 42.6% 47.5% 50.7% 51.9% 42.5% 2011 3/3 4.0 5.3 54.4% 72.4% 51.9% 63.3% 48.1% 63.3% 46.6%
30 2007 25/36 1.7 2.2 63.8% 59.2% 45.7% 47.8% 43.4% 54.4% 44.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 29/34 1.8 3.2 60.8% 59.0% 43.8% 47.8% 44.7% 52.8% 42.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 23/29 1.8 2.4 62.1% 59.4% 43.7% 56.0% 51.1% 53.5% 45.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 22/26 2.2 2.0 62.9% 56.2% 42.1% 50.0% 38.2% 51.0% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 1/1 3.0 0.0 54.3% 31.6% 18.8% 14.3% 0.0% 25.7% 23.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 128/377 2.0 2.6 61.3% 58.9% 43.7% 49.3% 44.5% 53.0% 42.9% — 228/550 2.9 4.4 54.6% 71.7% 51.4% 56.4% 53.8% 62.5% 50.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tathiana Garbin Justine Henin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1655 135.1 — — — — -44 -20 — 64.1% +1.38 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 101.1 -0.55
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1749 144.4 — — — — -25 -104 -162 59.1% +0.74 3–7 (30%) 3–4 (43%) 98.0 -1.83
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1984 161.8 — — — — -70 -139 -32 73.7% +1.68 12–11 (52%) 8–9 (47%) 100.5 -2.53
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 2004 159.7 — — — — -54 -47 +40 66.5% +1.01 11–9 (55%) 14–11 (56%) 98.9 -1.42
21 1998 1476 99.1 — — — — — +30 — 33.3% -1.50 0–2 1–0 — +0.11 2003 2211 171.2 +6.75 +6.21 1.432 57.6% -57 -5 -130 80.4% +2.15 16–4 (80%) 8–3 (73%) 110.8 -2.83
22 1999 1468 104.0 — — — — +69 +4 — 40.0% -0.57 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.8 +1.10 2004 2223 165.8 +3.52 +5.52 1.296 55.6% +14 -53 — 84.7% +2.27 5–2 (71%) 4–0 (100%) 104.0 -0.39
23 2000 1619 130.4 — — — — -93 +74 — 50.5% +0.20 9–4 (69%) 6–6 (50%) 106.4 -0.40 2005 2215 154.4 +1.66 +6.12 1.214 54.5% -50 +146 — 75.6% +1.76 12–2 (86%) 5–1 (83%) 107.2 -1.31
24 2001 1575 127.1 — — — — -22 +73 — 46.3% -0.06 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 97.7 +0.37 2006 2288 172.1 +7.32 +9.10 1.453 57.9% -24 +29 -105 83.9% +2.57 8–5 (62%) 6–2 (75%) 101.8 -3.18
25 2002 1600 121.8 — — — — -44 +115 — 51.3% -0.01 5–5 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 101.1 +0.83 2007 2384 173.7 +7.78 +7.96 1.402 56.9% +1 +34 -126 85.4% +2.48 14–3 (82%) 11–3 (79%) 107.3 -1.25
26 2003 1557 111.2 -0.57 -0.84 0.912 47.5% -9 +64 — 45.5% -0.44 6–6 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 101.4 +0.92 2008 2287 147.8 +2.60 +2.75 1.166 53.4% +23 — — 71.7% +1.61 5–1 (83%) 0–4 (0%) 95.1 +0.11
27 2004 1547 122.1 +1.14 +0.66 1.149 53.5% +2 +76 — 42.9% -0.27 2–10 (17%) 3–7 (30%) 88.3 -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 1559 119.9 -0.38 -1.30 0.916 48.0% -30 +111 — 43.5% -0.46 3–4 (43%) 5–5 (50%) 98.7 +0.08 2010 2207 159.2 +6.24 +4.44 1.266 54.5% +37 +55 +20 76.3% +1.49 8–7 (53%) 7–3 (70%) 96.9 -1.91
29 2006 1628 120.2 -2.20 -1.76 0.884 47.4% -84 +99 — 51.4% -0.03 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 100.7 +0.63 2011 2181 117.1 +2.80 +0.16 1.268 54.6% +36 — — 57.1% +1.57 1–0 0–1 — -0.01
30 2007 1659 123.9 -0.97 -0.08 0.977 49.1% -68 +117 -189 54.8% +0.26 5–2 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 105.3 +2.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 1564 113.6 -2.43 -1.04 0.900 47.7% +44 +64 — 44.9% -0.54 5–7 (42%) 3–1 (75%) 98.8 -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 1607 121.1 -1.22 +0.36 0.971 49.5% -29 +75 — 50.0% -0.10 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 98.0 -0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 1580 121.0 -2.83 -2.13 0.801 45.3% +22 +32 — 33.3% -1.42 6–2 (75%) 3–2 (60%) 106.1 -1.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 1573 96.6 +1.82 +1.60 0.317 24.6% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1726 125.4 -1.64 -0.76 0.912 48.0% -23 +78 -189 46.5% -0.27 52–60 (46%) 41–35 (54%) 102.2 +1.01 — 2394 169.9 +6.17 +6.72 1.351 56.2% -27 +4 -64 76.2% +1.83 97–54 (64%) 68–42 (62%) 107.0 -3.13

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.