H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Tatiana Golovin vs Aiko Nakamura H2H: 1-0
Tatiana Golovin holds a 1–0 lead over Aiko Nakamura in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tatiana Golovin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tatiana Golovin won the 2007 Indian Wells second round 6-0 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 38
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 42
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2007* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Tatiana Golovin | 6-0 7-5 | Aiko Nakamura | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatiana Golovin | #1,128 | #12 | 1,882 | 2,012 | 131 | 80 | 62.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Aiko Nakamura | #730 | #47 | 569 | 1,645 | 50 | 76 | 39.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tatiana Golovin | Aiko Nakamura | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2003 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #358 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2004 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #27 | 1,753 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2005 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2006 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #22 | 1,830 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2007 | 43–17 | 71.7% | #13 | 1,981 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2008 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #254 | 1,890 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #71 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #57 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #66 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #146 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #224 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #677 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |