H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Tatiana Golovin vs Anne Kremer H2H: 2-0

Tatiana Golovin holds a 2–0 lead over Anne Kremer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tatiana Golovin leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tatiana Golovin won the 2007 San Diego round of 32 6-1 4-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tatiana Golovin
FRA Age 38 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Anne Kremer
LUX Age 50 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tatiana Golovin #19 6-1 4-6 6-2 Anne Kremer #125 Match data Aug 2, 2007* R32 San Diego Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Tatiana Golovin #71 6-4 7-5 Anne Kremer #319 Match data Jun 12, 2004* QF Birmingham Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tatiana Golovin #1,128 #12 1,882 2,014 131 80 62.1% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Anne Kremer #1,039 #18 1,265 1,810 148 185 44.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tatiana Golovin Anne Kremer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2003 1–4 20.0% #358 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2004 27–15 64.3% #27 1,748 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2005 33–22 60.0% #24 1,770 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2006 25–18 58.1% #22 1,831 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2007 43–17 71.7% #13 1,982 0 2 1995 1–1 50.0% #242 1,516 0 0
20 2008 2–4 33.3% #254 1,892 0 2 1996 2–5 28.6% #134 1,507 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1997 1–5 16.7% #128 1,509 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1998 2–3 40.0% #74 1,552 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 1999 19–23 45.2% #31 1,639 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2000 28–25 52.8% #33 1,708 0 2
25 — — — — — — — 2001 32–28 53.3% #33 1,695 0 2
26 — — — — — — — 2002 29–28 50.9% #25 1,671 0 2
27 — — — — — — — 2003 1–2 33.3% #401 1,635 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 2004 12–15 44.4% #94 1,606 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 2005 5–13 27.8% #165 1,518 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2006 4–8 33.3% #145 1,524 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2007 7–13 35.0% #82 1,517 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2008 2–8 20.0% #265 1,460 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2009 1–3 25.0% #331 1,474 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2011 2–5 28.6% #238 1,463 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tatiana Golovin Anne Kremer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2003 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2004 15 9 24 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2005 21 15 36 58.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2006 21 14 35 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2007 32 14 46 69.6% 8 1 9 88.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2008 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 10 10 20 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 19 14 33 57.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 12 15 27 44.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 12 14 26 46.2% 8 6 14 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 5 9 44.4%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 5 9 14 35.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 8 9 11.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1 5 6 16.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 4 8 12 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 92 57 149 61.7% 15 12 27 55.6% 13 6 19 68.4% 11 5 16 68.8% — 73 104 177 41.2% 33 40 73 45.2% 27 23 50 54.0% 15 18 33 45.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tatiana Golovin Anne Kremer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2003 1480 104.4 -1.25 -1.00 0.643 41.4% +46 — — 33.3% -0.50 0–2 — — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2004 1749 139.2 -0.81 +2.08 1.016 50.5% -50 -271 +70 58.1% +0.63 6–6 (50%) 4–6 (40%) 98.9 -1.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2005 1770 139.7 +1.57 +1.88 1.144 53.0% -21 -181 +35 60.2% +0.68 9–13 (41%) 8–5 (62%) 98.5 -0.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2006 1831 151.9 +1.85 +1.96 1.079 51.7% +15 — — 59.4% +0.92 7–7 (50%) 5–10 (33%) 98.9 +0.88 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2007 1983 161.9 +4.08 +4.22 1.198 53.9% -19 -194 — 70.6% +1.52 9–7 (56%) 6–1 (86%) 106.1 -0.34 1995 1517 108.3 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — -0.09
20 2008 1893 111.5 +0.56 +1.03 1.040 50.9% -2 — — 40.0% -0.20 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.16 1996 1508 105.0 — — — — — +41 +58 26.7% -1.47 1–0 — — -0.12
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1509 117.6 — — — — +41 — — 26.7% -1.27 1–2 (33%) — — -0.53
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1552 126.8 — — — — +35 — — 36.4% -1.09 1–0 — — -0.65
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1640 130.5 — — — — -17 -83 -13 46.8% -0.28 6–8 (43%) 4–6 (40%) 98.6 +1.35
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1708 137.5 — — — — -4 -167 +12 54.7% +0.39 5–8 (38%) 7–8 (47%) 96.9 +0.80
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1695 135.0 — — — — +2 -55 +63 51.4% +0.08 13–9 (59%) 7–6 (54%) 106.4 -0.14
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1671 136.3 — — — — -30 +44 +113 48.9% +0.03 11–6 (65%) 5–8 (38%) 100.9 -0.24
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1635 94.6 — — — — -26 — — 33.3% -1.33 — — — +0.58
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1606 116.6 — — — — -50 +62 +217 45.2% -0.32 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 97.5 -0.32
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1519 109.7 -2.01 -0.99 0.878 46.9% -41 +130 +270 32.5% -1.13 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.09
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1525 108.9 -3.12 -1.22 0.801 44.7% -70 +140 — 33.3% -1.56 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -0.81
31 2019 1865 95.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1517 118.0 -2.42 -0.54 0.875 46.9% -37 +124 — 41.9% -0.67 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — -0.03
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1460 103.3 -3.64 -1.04 0.816 45.2% +16 +103 — 30.0% -1.70 0–2 2–0 — +0.27
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1474 105.0 -0.28 -0.99 0.717 42.3% +16 — — 14.3% -2.57 0–1 — — -0.74
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1463 94.3 -4.07 -2.73 0.727 42.9% +14 — — 31.3% -1.81 1–1 2–0 — +0.19
Career — 2014 151.5 +2.59 +2.99 1.129 52.7% -15 -202 +58 61.1% +0.89 32–37 (46%) 23–23 (50%) 98.8 -0.61 — 1810 132.2 -2.85 -1.19 0.815 45.3% -14 +3 +102 45.5% -0.32 47–51 (48%) 33–33 (50%) 100.8 -0.12

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.