H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Tatiana Golovin vs Lisa Raymond H2H: 1-1
Tatiana Golovin and Lisa Raymond are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tatiana Golovin leads 1–0 on clay, while Lisa Raymond leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tatiana Golovin won the 2005 Charleston third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 38
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 52
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2005* | Charleston | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Tatiana Golovin | 6-4 6-3 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
| Jan 28, 2004* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Lisa Raymond | 6-2 6-0 | Tatiana Golovin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatiana Golovin | #1,128 | #12 | 1,882 | 2,012 | 131 | 80 | 62.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Lisa Raymond | #884 | #15 | 1,695 | 1,945 | 325 | 272 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tatiana Golovin | Lisa Raymond | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2003 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #358 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2004 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #27 | 1,753 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #336 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2005 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #257 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2006 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #22 | 1,830 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #75 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2007 | 43–17 | 71.7% | #13 | 1,981 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #55 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #254 | 1,890 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #44 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #20 | 1,813 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #27 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #17 | 1,910 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #28 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #22 | 1,833 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #29 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #27 | 1,767 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #30 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #74 | 1,631 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #128 | 1,580 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #884 | 1,563 | 0 | 4 |