H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Tatiana Golovin vs Lisa Raymond H2H: 1-1

Tatiana Golovin and Lisa Raymond are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tatiana Golovin leads 1–0 on clay, while Lisa Raymond leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tatiana Golovin won the 2005 Charleston Open round of 32 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tatiana Golovin
FRA Age 38 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Lisa Raymond
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tatiana Golovin #25 6-4 6-3 Lisa Raymond #50 Match data Apr 14, 2005* R32 Charleston Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Lisa Raymond #30 6-2 6-0 Tatiana Golovin #354 Match data Jan 28, 2004* R16 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tatiana Golovin #1,128 #12 1,882 2,014 131 80 62.1% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Lisa Raymond #884 #15 1,695 1,946 327 273 54.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tatiana Golovin Lisa Raymond
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2003 1–4 20.0% #358 1,479 0 0 1989 0–1 0.0% #449 1,496 0 0
16 2004 27–15 64.3% #27 1,748 0 0 1990 0–1 0.0% #336 1,480 0 0
17 2005 33–22 60.0% #24 1,770 0 0 1991 2–1 66.7% #257 1,510 0 0
18 2006 25–18 58.1% #22 1,831 0 0 1992 7–6 53.8% #75 1,618 0 0
19 2007 43–17 71.7% #13 1,982 0 2 1993 13–12 52.0% #55 1,692 0 0
20 2008 2–4 33.3% #254 1,892 0 2 1994 19–17 52.8% #44 1,749 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1995 25–16 61.0% #20 1,812 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1996 23–19 54.8% #27 1,860 0 1
23 — — — — — — — 1997 31–21 59.6% #17 1,913 0 1
24 — — — — — — — 1998 29–21 58.0% #27 1,838 0 1
25 — — — — — — — 1999 22–23 48.9% #28 1,784 0 1
26 — — — — — — — 2000 26–20 56.5% #30 1,794 0 2
27 — — — — — — — 2001 33–21 61.1% #22 1,833 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 2002 29–21 58.0% #29 1,755 0 3
29 — — — — — — — 2003 25–18 58.1% #27 1,766 0 4
30 — — — — — — — 2004 20–19 51.3% #30 1,760 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 2005 14–19 42.4% #74 1,635 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2006 9–16 36.0% #128 1,581 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2007 0–1 0.0% #884 1,564 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tatiana Golovin Lisa Raymond
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2003 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2004 15 9 24 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2005 21 15 36 58.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1991 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2006 21 14 35 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1992 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
19 2007 32 14 46 69.6% 8 1 9 88.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1993 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 5 4 9 55.6%
20 2008 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1994 8 8 16 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 14 10 24 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 10 10 20 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 18 11 29 62.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 13 9 22 59.1% 11 5 16 68.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 8 12 20 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 6 8 14 42.9% 5 5 10 50.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 6 5 11 54.5%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 18 12 30 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 21 14 35 60.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 16 11 27 59.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 18 12 30 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 11 12 23 47.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 4 8 12 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 92 57 149 61.7% 15 12 27 55.6% 13 6 19 68.4% 11 5 16 68.8% — 175 152 327 53.5% 45 48 93 48.4% 53 36 89 59.6% 54 37 91 59.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tatiana Golovin Lisa Raymond
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2003 1480 104.4 -1.25 -1.00 0.643 41.4% +46 — — 33.3% -0.50 0–2 — — -0.07 1989 1497 99.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.17
16 2004 1749 139.2 -0.81 +2.08 1.016 50.5% -50 -271 +70 58.1% +0.63 6–6 (50%) 4–6 (40%) 98.9 -1.07 1990 1480 94.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.23
17 2005 1770 139.7 +1.57 +1.88 1.144 53.0% -21 -181 +35 60.2% +0.68 9–13 (41%) 8–5 (62%) 98.5 -0.53 1991 1511 107.5 — — — — +27 — — 57.1% +0.29 1–0 — — +0.30
18 2006 1831 151.9 +1.85 +1.96 1.079 51.7% +15 — — 59.4% +0.92 7–7 (50%) 5–10 (33%) 98.9 +0.88 1992 1618 137.7 — — — — +26 — — 51.9% +0.15 1–0 0–2 — +0.38
19 2007 1983 161.9 +4.08 +4.22 1.198 53.9% -19 -194 — 70.6% +1.52 9–7 (56%) 6–1 (86%) 106.1 -0.34 1993 1692 137.1 — — — — -34 — +15 54.4% +0.51 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) 96.3 +0.84
20 2008 1893 111.5 +0.56 +1.03 1.040 50.9% -2 — — 40.0% -0.20 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.16 1994 1749 138.6 — — — — -41 -122 -60 55.2% +0.24 5–10 (33%) 6–4 (60%) 98.6 +0.10
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1813 147.9 — — — — -6 — -76 56.0% +0.40 12–6 (67%) 7–5 (58%) 107.8 +0.56
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1861 149.8 — — — — 0 -246 -26 53.3% +0.25 5–5 (50%) 6–4 (60%) 101.3 -0.87
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1913 159.1 — — — — +23 -242 -109 57.9% +0.55 9–8 (53%) 7–2 (78%) 104.2 -0.65
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1839 147.1 — — — — +16 -55 -97 56.9% +0.45 10–10 (50%) 8–5 (62%) 98.2 +0.54
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1784 143.4 — — — — +11 -60 -17 49.5% +0.06 9–10 (47%) 5–6 (45%) 98.1 -0.50
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1795 141.6 — — — — -33 -118 +163 55.0% +0.43 9–8 (53%) 2–6 (25%) 96.1 -0.19
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1834 151.1 — — — — -13 -128 +181 58.1% +0.74 10–8 (56%) 5–5 (50%) 101.6 -2.05
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1755 138.0 — — — — +6 -113 +316 54.5% +0.35 8–4 (67%) 3–7 (30%) 97.9 +0.97
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1766 139.9 +1.58 +1.47 1.097 52.3% +23 -87 +216 53.8% +0.08 13–7 (65%) 7–4 (64%) 105.7 +0.07
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1760 142.2 +2.54 -0.29 1.089 51.9% +66 -171 +175 48.9% +0.05 10–6 (63%) 4–2 (67%) 103.9 +0.43
31 2019 1865 95.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1635 122.3 -3.26 -0.74 0.782 44.6% +87 -100 +170 43.2% -0.10 6–4 (60%) 5–2 (71%) 103.1 +2.00
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1581 121.0 +0.78 -3.50 0.877 47.3% +54 -66 +220 35.2% -0.93 3–3 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 96.0 -0.49
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1565 98.6 -2.01 +0.33 0.601 42.0% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — 0.00
Career — 2014 151.5 +2.59 +2.99 1.129 52.7% -15 -202 +58 61.1% +0.89 32–37 (46%) 23–23 (50%) 98.8 -0.61 — 1947 150.2 +0.86 -1.52 0.940 48.9% +12 -115 +91 53.0% +0.26 113–94 (55%) 71–64 (53%) 102.4 +0.25

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.