H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Tatiana Golovin vs Lourdes Domínguez Lino H2H: 2-0

Tatiana Golovin holds a 2–0 lead over Lourdes Domínguez Lino in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tatiana Golovin leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tatiana Golovin won the 2006 Miami Open round of 64 7-5 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tatiana Golovin
FRA Age 38 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Spain Age 45 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tatiana Golovin #24 7-5 6-0 Lourdes Domínguez Lino #52 Match data Mar 22, 2006* R64 Miami Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Tatiana Golovin #23 6-2 6-0 Lourdes Domínguez Lino #54 Match data Mar 8, 2006* R64 Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tatiana Golovin #1,128 #12 1,882 2,014 131 80 62.1% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #1,129 #40 1,305 1,673 125 157 44.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tatiana Golovin Lourdes Domínguez Lino
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2003 1–4 20.0% #358 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2004 27–15 64.3% #27 1,748 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2005 33–22 60.0% #24 1,770 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2006 25–18 58.1% #22 1,831 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2007 43–17 71.7% #13 1,982 0 2 2000 0–1 0.0% #141 1,489 0 0
20 2008 2–4 33.3% #254 1,892 0 2 2001 0–1 0.0% #378 1,479 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2002 4–3 57.1% #390 1,518 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2003 0–1 0.0% #319 1,503 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2004 1–1 50.0% #208 1,508 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2005 6–4 60.0% #72 1,553 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2006 21–19 52.5% #52 1,623 0 1
26 — — — — — — — 2007 16–21 43.2% #71 1,557 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 2008 6–11 35.3% #91 1,507 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 2009 6–13 31.6% #134 1,477 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2010 2–4 33.3% #85 1,487 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2011 16–16 50.0% #79 1,574 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2012 16–16 50.0% #48 1,652 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2013 17–22 43.6% #69 1,620 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2014 7–11 38.9% #110 1,568 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2015 4–5 44.4% #100 1,550 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2016 3–8 27.3% #220 1,516 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tatiana Golovin Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2003 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2004 15 9 24 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2005 21 15 36 58.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2006 21 14 35 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2007 32 14 46 69.6% 8 1 9 88.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2008 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 7 10 17 41.2% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 3 9 12 25.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 4 4 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 3 4 25.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 3 6 9 33.3% 11 8 19 57.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 10 8 18 55.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1 8 9 11.1% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 0 5 5 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
Career — 92 57 149 61.7% 15 12 27 55.6% 13 6 19 68.4% 11 5 16 68.8% — 27 59 86 31.4% 94 88 182 51.6% 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tatiana Golovin Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2003 1480 104.4 -1.25 -1.00 0.643 41.4% +46 — — 33.3% -0.50 0–2 — — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2004 1749 139.2 -0.81 +2.08 1.016 50.5% -50 -271 +70 58.1% +0.63 6–6 (50%) 4–6 (40%) 98.9 -1.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2005 1770 139.7 +1.57 +1.88 1.144 53.0% -21 -181 +35 60.2% +0.68 9–13 (41%) 8–5 (62%) 98.5 -0.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2006 1831 151.9 +1.85 +1.96 1.079 51.7% +15 — — 59.4% +0.92 7–7 (50%) 5–10 (33%) 98.9 +0.88 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2007 1983 161.9 +4.08 +4.22 1.198 53.9% -19 -194 — 70.6% +1.52 9–7 (56%) 6–1 (86%) 106.1 -0.34 2000 1489 98.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.06
20 2008 1893 111.5 +0.56 +1.03 1.040 50.9% -2 — — 40.0% -0.20 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.16 2001 1480 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.06
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1519 112.4 — — — — — +41 — 57.1% +0.14 — 2–1 (67%) — +0.22
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1503 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.07
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1509 105.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.34 1–1 0–1 — +0.01
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1553 117.7 — — — — — +72 — 61.9% +0.38 0–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.23
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1623 121.0 — — — — -68 +93 — 51.2% -0.30 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 102.8 +0.22
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1558 113.3 — — — — -56 +110 — 43.2% -0.49 4–3 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 100.6 -0.29
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1508 107.1 — — — — -48 +107 — 37.8% -1.11 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — -0.03
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1477 108.0 — — — — -35 +83 — 37.8% -0.82 2–5 (29%) 2–5 (29%) 95.2 +0.87
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1487 102.6 — — — — 0 — — 35.7% -1.36 1–1 0–1 — +0.13
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1575 121.5 — — — — -73 0 +20 50.0% +0.11 6–6 (50%) 1–7 (13%) 95.2 +0.42
31 2019 1865 95.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1653 124.6 — — — — -17 -96 — 54.3% +0.04 2–6 (25%) 4–1 (80%) 100.6 0.00
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1620 121.2 — — — — -86 +113 — 41.3% -0.81 10–8 (56%) 2–3 (40%) 103.9 -1.33
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1569 107.5 — — — — -102 +137 — 40.0% -0.89 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.57
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1550 113.7 -1.03 +0.35 0.984 50.1% — +126 — 50.0% -0.05 1–3 (25%) 2–0 — +0.51
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1517 97.5 -3.20 -2.29 0.761 44.1% -86 +117 — 25.0% -1.75 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.18
Career — 2014 151.5 +2.59 +2.99 1.129 52.7% -15 -202 +58 61.1% +0.89 32–37 (46%) 23–23 (50%) 98.8 -0.61 — 1674 120.0 -2.29 -1.18 0.851 46.6% -55 +78 +20 45.2% -0.48 35–45 (44%) 26–29 (47%) 98.8 +0.46

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.