H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Tatiana Panova vs Kveta Peschke H2H: 1-1
Tatiana Panova and Kveta Peschke are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Tatiana Panova won the 2005 Cincinnati third round 6-4 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 49
Right-Handed
154 cm / 5'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 51
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2005* | Cincinnati | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Tatiana Panova | 6-4 7-6(6) | Kveta Peschke | Match data |
| Mar 7, 1999* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Kveta Peschke | 6-4 6-1 | Tatiana Panova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatiana Panova | #1,113 | #20 | 1,270 | 1,782 | 130 | 196 | 39.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kveta Peschke | #264 | #26 | 1,028 | 1,826 | 92 | 115 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tatiana Panova | Kveta Peschke | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #237 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1995 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #179 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #97 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #78 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1999 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #40 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #60 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2000 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #34 | 1,698 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #44 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2001 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #40 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #47 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2002 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #23 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #85 | 1,716 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2003 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #114 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #148 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2004 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #77 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #91 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2006 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #30 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #133 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #264 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 |