Tatiana Panova
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chanda Rubin | 0 | 7 | 7 | Aug 14, 2002 | H2H |
| Henrieta Nagyova | 5 | 1 | 6 | Sep 19, 2002 | H2H |
| Magui Serna | 2 | 4 | 6 | May 3, 2002 | H2H |
| Amanda Coetzer | 2 | 4 | 6 | Oct 11, 2001 | H2H |
| Jill Craybas | 4 | 1 | 5 | May 19, 2005 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Tatiana Panova and Kveta Peschke are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Tatiana Panova won the 2005 Cincinnati Open round of 32 6-4 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatiana Panova | 6-4 7-6(6) | Kveta Peschke | Match data | Jul 21, 2005* | R32 | Cincinnati Open | Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
| Kveta Peschke | 6-4 6-1 | Tatiana Panova | Match data | Mar 10, 1999* | R64 | Indian Wells Open | Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatiana Panova | #1,113 | #20 | 1,270 | 1,782 | 130 | 196 | 39.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kveta Peschke | #264 | #26 | 1,028 | 1,806 | 92 | 116 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tatiana Panova | Kveta Peschke | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #237 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1995 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #179 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #97 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #78 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1999 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #40 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #60 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2000 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #34 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #44 | 1,703 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2001 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #40 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #47 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2002 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #23 | 1,753 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #85 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2003 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #114 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #148 | 1,673 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2004 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #77 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #91 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,675 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2006 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #30 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #133 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #264 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Tatiana Panova | Kveta Peschke | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 1994 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1993 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 18 | 1995 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1994 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1999 | 8 | 14 | 22 | 36.4% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1998 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 2000 | 15 | 14 | 29 | 51.7% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1999 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| 24 | 2001 | 10 | 16 | 26 | 38.5% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 2000 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% |
| 25 | 2002 | 23 | 19 | 42 | 54.8% | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2001 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 26 | 2003 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2002 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 27 | 2004 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2004 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 12 | 13 | 25 | 48.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 4 | 11 | 15 | 26.7% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 78 | 109 | 187 | 41.7% | 24 | 48 | 72 | 33.3% | 14 | 18 | 32 | 43.8% | 14 | 21 | 35 | 40.0% | — | 41 | 57 | 98 | 41.8% | 31 | 33 | 64 | 48.4% | 7 | 11 | 18 | 38.9% | 13 | 15 | 28 | 46.4% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 12/49 of Tatiana Panova's and 34/75 of Kveta Peschke's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Tatiana Panova | Kveta Peschke | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 27 | 2004 | 3/22 | 1.0 | 5.3 | 60.8% | 51.6% | 46.8% | 48.3% | 33.3% | 49.8% | 32.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 6/23 | 0.8 | 4.2 | 65.9% | 55.3% | 39.8% | 45.9% | 40.0% | 50.4% | 42.8% | 2004 | 2/6 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 63.2% | 61.3% | 52.4% | 33.9% | 32.2% | 58.1% | 45.8% |
| 29 | 2006 | 3/4 | 0.3 | 10.0 | 53.2% | 50.6% | 34.2% | 49.0% | 47.2% | 43.0% | 35.7% | 2005 | 8/40 | 0.9 | 4.8 | 56.4% | 67.1% | 38.3% | 66.7% | 44.7% | 54.3% | 50.0% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 22/27 | 0.9 | 3.6 | 60.2% | 56.2% | 39.8% | 45.2% | 36.4% | 49.5% | 41.6% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 2/2 | 0.5 | 3.5 | 74.4% | 52.8% | 40.9% | 51.9% | 76.7% | 49.8% | 45.6% |
| Career | — | 12/326 | 0.8 | 5.9 | 61.4% | 53.2% | 40.2% | 47.3% | 40.1% | 48.4% | 38.4% | — | 34/208 | 0.9 | 3.8 | 60.3% | 58.9% | 40.2% | 50.0% | 40.5% | 51.1% | 44.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Tatiana Panova | Kveta Peschke | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1508 | 105.4 | — | — | — | — | +37 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | — | — | — | -0.36 | 1993 | 1510 | 110.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 42.9% | -0.14 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.41 |
| 18 | 1995 | 1486 | 100.7 | — | — | — | — | +8 | — | — | 23.5% | -2.41 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–0 | — | -0.67 | 1994 | 1508 | 108.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.17 |
| 19 | 1996 | 1498 | 103.8 | — | — | — | — | +10 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.40 | 1–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 1475 | 115.4 | — | — | — | — | +37 | +88 | — | 30.0% | -1.50 | 1–3 (25%) | 3–4 (43%) | 98.9 | +0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 1472 | 113.4 | — | — | — | — | +19 | +31 | +105 | 36.1% | -1.28 | 3–8 (27%) | 2–2 (50%) | 96.6 | -0.59 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1999 | 1584 | 124.6 | — | — | — | — | -26 | -115 | +13 | 45.3% | -0.71 | 3–11 (21%) | 7–6 (54%) | 97.6 | +0.99 | 1998 | 1568 | 122.5 | — | — | — | — | -52 | +106 | — | 48.1% | -0.17 | 5–5 (50%) | 1–3 (25%) | 100.6 | +0.78 |
| 23 | 2000 | 1677 | 127.2 | — | — | — | — | +4 | -238 | -133 | 44.2% | -0.41 | 6–4 (60%) | 4–4 (50%) | 103.1 | +0.59 | 1999 | 1704 | 141.0 | — | — | — | — | -52 | -7 | — | 42.9% | -0.50 | 6–4 (60%) | 3–1 (75%) | 107.3 | -0.83 |
| 24 | 2001 | 1661 | 126.0 | — | — | — | — | -34 | -140 | -4 | 44.0% | -0.58 | 7–9 (44%) | 6–6 (50%) | 99.1 | +2.56 | 2000 | 1791 | 137.4 | — | — | — | — | -59 | -53 | — | 49.4% | -0.48 | 8–3 (73%) | 4–3 (57%) | 107.0 | -2.20 |
| 25 | 2002 | 1753 | 142.0 | — | — | — | — | -3 | -148 | -80 | 50.7% | +0.03 | 13–11 (54%) | 5–5 (50%) | 104.6 | +0.43 | 2001 | 1711 | 130.0 | — | — | — | — | +7 | -42 | — | 45.7% | -0.29 | 6–6 (50%) | 2–6 (25%) | 96.6 | -1.12 |
| 26 | 2003 | 1637 | 117.1 | — | — | — | — | +61 | -104 | — | 35.4% | -1.44 | 5–3 (63%) | 2–1 (67%) | 102.1 | +0.47 | 2002 | 1674 | 121.8 | — | — | — | — | +8 | — | -162 | 39.4% | -0.39 | 2–5 (29%) | — | — | -1.13 |
| 27 | 2004 | 1597 | 115.0 | -1.24 | -2.66 | 0.643 | 41.5% | +18 | — | +112 | 37.8% | -1.11 | 2–3 (40%) | 1–3 (25%) | 97.3 | -0.34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 1520 | 110.7 | -2.14 | -1.30 | 0.863 | 46.4% | +35 | -39 | +140 | 37.5% | -0.77 | 5–5 (50%) | 3–6 (33%) | 98.0 | +0.57 | 2004 | 1675 | 115.7 | +1.25 | +0.61 | 1.094 | 51.2% | +20 | -45 | — | 50.0% | +0.36 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.08 |
| 29 | 2006 | 1470 | 92.4 | -3.36 | -3.69 | 0.625 | 39.5% | +28 | — | — | 11.1% | -3.33 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.14 | 2005 | 1770 | 145.7 | +0.02 | +2.42 | 1.095 | 52.3% | -32 | -63 | -203 | 54.8% | +0.31 | 4–9 (31%) | 6–3 (67%) | 97.6 | -2.24 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1595 | 110.3 | -4.62 | -1.44 | 0.822 | 45.7% | -4 | +15 | +34 | 35.1% | -1.07 | 1–6 (14%) | 1–4 (20%) | 91.9 | +1.43 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1601 | 103.8 | -0.67 | +2.50 | 0.908 | 47.7% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.80 | 1–0 | — | — | 0.00 |
| Career | — | 1783 | 128.5 | -2.22 | -2.24 | 0.744 | 43.5% | +3 | -105 | +13 | 42.0% | -0.73 | 47–61 (44%) | 34–39 (47%) | 99.1 | +1.31 | — | 1806 | 139.1 | -2.95 | -0.18 | 0.901 | 47.7% | -26 | -3 | -117 | 46.1% | -0.32 | 34–40 (46%) | 18–22 (45%) | 98.4 | -2.90 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chanda Rubin | 0 | 7 | 7 | Aug 14, 2002 | H2H |
| Henrieta Nagyova | 5 | 1 | 6 | Sep 19, 2002 | H2H |
| Magui Serna | 2 | 4 | 6 | May 3, 2002 | H2H |
| Amanda Coetzer | 2 | 4 | 6 | Oct 11, 2001 | H2H |
| Jill Craybas | 4 | 1 | 5 | May 19, 2005 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magdalena Maleeva | 1 | 5 | 6 | Aug 28, 2002 | H2H |
| Amélie Mauresmo | 1 | 5 | 6 | Feb 16, 2001 | H2H |
| Martina Hingis | 0 | 5 | 5 | Mar 8, 2001 | H2H |
| Nadia Petrova | 1 | 3 | 4 | May 29, 2007 | H2H |
| Justine Henin | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jun 23, 2006 | H2H |