H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Tatiana Perebiynis vs Stephanie Foretz Gacon H2H: 0-1

Stephanie Foretz Gacon holds a 1–0 lead over Tatiana Perebiynis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Stephanie Foretz Gacon leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Stephanie Foretz Gacon won the 2003 Birmingham round of 16 6-3 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tatiana Perebiynis
UKR Age 43 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Stephanie Foretz Gacon
FRA Age 45 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Stephanie Foretz Gacon 6-3 7-6(4) Tatiana Perebiynis #86 Match data Jun 13, 2003* R16 Birmingham Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tatiana Perebiynis #1,227 #55 768 1,615 40 71 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stephanie Foretz Gacon — — — 1,647 61 115 34.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tatiana Perebiynis Stephanie Foretz Gacon
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2000 0–1 0.0% #192 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2001 2–4 33.3% #138 1,499 0 0 1999 1–2 33.3% — 1,511 0 0
19 2002 5–7 41.7% #119 1,517 0 0 2000 1–2 33.3% — 1,513 0 0
20 2003 7–10 41.2% #78 1,554 0 0 2001 5–6 45.5% — 1,558 0 0
21 2004 10–15 40.0% #91 1,576 0 0 2002 11–12 47.8% — 1,604 0 0
22 2005 3–14 17.6% #214 1,458 0 0 2003 12–15 44.4% — 1,589 0 0
23 2006 2–2 50.0% #161 1,484 0 0 2004 3–10 23.1% — 1,532 0 0
24 2007 2–4 33.3% #97 1,484 0 0 2005 5–14 26.3% — 1,500 0 0
25 2008 9–13 40.9% #90 1,572 0 0 2006 5–14 26.3% — 1,443 0 0
26 2009 0–1 0.0% #867 1,557 0 0 2007 2–6 25.0% — 1,457 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2008 0–2 0.0% — 1,455 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2009 2–7 22.2% — 1,421 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2010 0–3 0.0% — 1,401 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2011 2–6 25.0% — 1,406 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2012 10–10 50.0% — 1,513 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2013 2–5 28.6% — 1,501 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2015 0–1 0.0% — 1,490 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tatiana Perebiynis Stephanie Foretz Gacon
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2001 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1999 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
19 2002 3 2 5 60.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2000 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
20 2003 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2004 6 7 13 46.2% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2002 5 6 11 45.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 2005 2 6 8 25.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2003 7 9 16 43.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2006 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 1 7 8 12.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 2007 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2005 2 9 11 18.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
25 2008 4 8 12 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2006 3 5 8 37.5% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2009 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 21 34 55 38.2% 12 26 38 31.6% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — 31 59 90 34.4% 17 37 54 31.5% 11 17 28 39.3% 2 2 4 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 43/92 of Tatiana Perebiynis's and 74/136 of Stephanie Foretz Gacon's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tatiana Perebiynis Stephanie Foretz Gacon
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2003 5/17 2.4 4.0 59.0% 64.6% 48.9% 53.1% 38.0% 57.9% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2004 5/25 4.2 2.6 58.3% 62.4% 33.5% 35.0% 33.7% 50.6% 45.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2005 6/17 2.8 6.7 57.0% 63.0% 42.3% 52.1% 45.0% 53.7% 38.5% 2003 4/27 1.5 6.8 53.2% 54.0% 39.1% 53.8% 40.0% 47.2% 46.4%
23 2006 2/4 2.5 2.5 56.9% 63.0% 40.8% 31.4% 30.4% 53.1% 33.4% 2004 5/13 1.2 5.2 56.7% 53.9% 47.6% 47.1% 38.1% 51.2% 42.6%
24 2007 5/6 3.0 2.6 62.0% 62.8% 38.1% 50.6% 38.7% 53.5% 38.3% 2005 6/19 2.5 7.0 59.4% 57.9% 44.5% 44.9% 46.2% 52.7% 44.4%
25 2008 19/22 2.7 2.5 60.7% 62.2% 43.8% 47.5% 52.7% 55.1% 41.2% 2006 12/19 1.8 4.7 61.9% 55.5% 38.3% 47.5% 40.8% 49.8% 41.6%
26 2009 1/1 3.0 4.0 66.7% 57.4% 63.0% 37.5% 50.0% 59.3% 39.1% 2007 4/8 1.8 6.8 57.8% 60.3% 32.5% 55.1% 54.2% 48.5% 36.2%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 1/2 1.0 1.0 70.7% 58.5% 23.5% 33.3% 100.0% 48.3% 34.6%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 8/9 1.8 4.8 62.8% 61.0% 46.9% 44.2% 42.6% 55.2% 41.2%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 2/3 1.5 3.5 59.5% 52.1% 24.3% 28.6% 7.1% 41.4% 30.7%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 7/8 3.0 4.0 58.8% 58.6% 43.5% 50.7% 57.5% 52.6% 39.9%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 18/20 2.6 3.6 55.5% 63.4% 44.5% 58.3% 46.7% 55.2% 44.8%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 6/7 1.3 3.7 55.2% 52.9% 37.3% 36.4% 53.7% 46.0% 46.9%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 1/1 13.0 7.0 64.1% 73.8% 36.2% 50.0% 42.9% 60.3% 41.5%
Career — 43/111 2.9 3.3 59.8% 62.6% 42.6% 46.7% 45.0% 54.5% 40.3% — 74/176 2.2 4.7 58.5% 58.6% 41.4% 49.0% 45.9% 51.6% 42.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tatiana Perebiynis Stephanie Foretz Gacon
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2000 1489 98.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2001 1499 106.2 — — — — +10 — — 41.2% -0.65 2–3 (40%) 0–2 — -0.42 1999 1511 107.7 — — — — — +38 — 37.5% -1.38 1–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.39
19 2002 1517 113.5 — — — — +21 +3 — 48.3% +0.21 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — +0.04 2000 1513 105.7 — — — — — +27 — 42.9% -0.71 0–1 1–0 — +0.01
20 2003 1555 113.5 +0.84 -2.26 0.935 48.2% -9 -59 +76 44.4% -0.14 2–2 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 99.1 +0.33 2001 1559 118.8 — — — — +31 -46 — 46.4% -0.04 3–3 (50%) 1–0 — -0.48
21 2004 1577 115.8 -1.40 +0.18 0.913 47.3% -12 -88 +27 46.4% -0.41 0–6 (0%) 3–5 (38%) 92.3 +0.62 2002 1605 127.2 — — — — -4 -29 -66 50.0% -0.10 1–3 (25%) 5–1 (83%) 101.5 +0.03
22 2005 1458 105.0 -1.09 -2.12 0.832 46.3% +71 -37 — 28.6% -1.57 2–6 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.1 +0.30 2003 1589 115.5 -3.06 +0.16 0.879 47.0% 0 -51 +46 43.3% -0.53 4–4 (50%) 4–0 (100%) 104.2 +0.97
23 2006 1484 101.4 -0.56 -1.98 0.711 43.3% — — — 40.0% -1.00 2–0 — — +0.18 2004 1532 111.6 -1.58 -0.22 0.873 47.0% -19 +10 — 31.3% -1.19 2–4 (33%) 4–3 (57%) 100.0 -0.31
24 2007 1484 108.5 -1.64 -2.19 0.822 46.3% +53 — — 35.7% -1.21 1–1 — — +0.65 2005 1501 103.6 -0.99 -0.13 0.938 48.6% -44 -15 +148 29.3% -1.44 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 98.1 -0.82
25 2008 1573 124.1 +0.92 -0.90 0.917 48.5% -27 -48 — 40.4% -0.77 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 102.3 -0.70 2006 1444 101.7 -4.22 -1.54 0.829 45.8% +32 -13 — 32.6% -1.22 3–5 (38%) 0–2 — +0.07
26 2009 1558 99.3 +0.80 -1.09 0.960 48.6% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.07 2007 1457 115.6 -1.06 -2.17 0.702 42.7% +26 — — 27.8% -1.61 1–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.62
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1455 106.9 +3.39 +4.25 0.669 41.8% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.46
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1421 97.6 -0.52 -1.66 0.920 47.9% +55 -3 +137 30.4% -1.00 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +0.41
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1402 102.9 -1.39 -0.34 0.524 35.8% — — — 14.3% -2.86 0–1 0–1 — -0.12
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1407 106.9 -1.79 -0.90 0.842 46.7% +64 -4 — 31.6% -1.32 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.10
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1513 113.5 -0.88 +0.34 1.000 50.1% -12 -50 +63 52.3% -0.32 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — +0.73
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1502 102.0 -3.63 +0.69 0.868 46.6% -19 -44 — 31.3% -1.38 1–1 1–0 — -0.10
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1491 103.0 -2.87 -1.23 1.046 51.0% — — — 33.3% +0.33 0–1 — — +0.03
Career — 1615 118.0 -0.01 -1.31 0.886 47.5% +6 -47 +54 40.6% -0.67 12–24 (33%) 7–16 (30%) 89.7 +0.94 — 1648 117.4 -1.86 -0.48 0.879 47.2% +3 -19 +71 38.2% -0.88 21–35 (38%) 21–15 (58%) 102.5 -0.65

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.