Tatiana Poutchek
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meilen Tu | 1 | 3 | 4 | Mar 6, 2007 | H2H |
| Martina Müller | 0 | 3 | 3 | Sep 13, 2007 | H2H |
| Sania Mirza | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jun 10, 2009 | H2H |
| Raluca Olaru | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jun 11, 2008 | H2H |
| Sofia Arvidsson | 1 | 1 | 2 | Mar 25, 2008 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Ashley Harkleroad holds a 1–0 lead over Tatiana Poutchek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ashley Harkleroad leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ashley Harkleroad won the 2007 New Haven round of 32 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ashley Harkleroad | 6-1 6-0 | Tatiana Poutchek | Match data | Aug 23, 2007* | R32 | New Haven | Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatiana Poutchek | #1,078 | #55 | 609 | 1,625 | 51 | 101 | 33.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ashley Harkleroad | #1,051 | #39 | 821 | 1,681 | 51 | 79 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tatiana Poutchek | Ashley Harkleroad | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #734 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #277 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #113 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #123 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #136 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #118 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #86 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #86 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #76 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #67 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #100 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #133 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #121 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #223 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1020 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2005 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2006 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #123 | 1,417 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2007 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #94 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #171 | 1,446 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #421 | 1,417 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Tatiana Poutchek | Ashley Harkleroad | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 1995 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2001 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1999 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2000 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2006 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2001 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2002 | 10 | 14 | 24 | 41.7% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2003 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2004 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2005 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2006 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2007 | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.3% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2008 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2009 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2010 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 37 | 62 | 99 | 37.4% | 11 | 28 | 39 | 28.2% | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | 35 | 52 | 87 | 40.2% | 14 | 19 | 33 | 42.4% | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Tatiana Poutchek | Ashley Harkleroad | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 1995 | 1484 | 99.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.15 | 2001 | 1479 | 102.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.17 | 0–2 | — | — | -0.03 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1502 | 120.5 | — | — | — | — | +25 | — | — | 37.5% | -0.50 | — | 1–1 | — | -0.26 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1592 | 121.9 | -0.82 | +0.82 | 0.967 | 49.5% | -59 | +93 | — | 49.1% | -0.04 | 1–6 (14%) | 2–3 (40%) | 94.4 | +0.64 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1581 | 123.9 | -1.88 | -0.09 | 0.856 | 46.1% | 0 | +53 | — | 42.9% | -0.62 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–3 (25%) | 99.0 | -0.37 |
| 20 | 1999 | 1484 | 112.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | -0.25 | 2005 | 1529 | 99.7 | -1.98 | -1.34 | 0.341 | 24.0% | +12 | — | — | 25.0% | -2.25 | 0–2 | — | — | -0.09 |
| 21 | 2000 | 1506 | 111.4 | — | — | — | — | +42 | — | — | 44.0% | -0.56 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.43 | 2006 | 1550 | 119.5 | -0.91 | -2.27 | 0.871 | 47.1% | +17 | +27 | — | 41.5% | -0.98 | 1–4 (20%) | 4–1 (80%) | 99.6 | -0.70 |
| 22 | 2001 | 1550 | 114.4 | — | — | — | — | +38 | -68 | — | 39.7% | -0.81 | 5–7 (42%) | 1–3 (25%) | 99.2 | -0.45 | 2007 | 1513 | 111.3 | -2.54 | -1.08 | 0.912 | 48.0% | +6 | +48 | — | 37.2% | -0.67 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–3 (40%) | 98.6 | +1.00 |
| 23 | 2002 | 1512 | 111.7 | — | — | — | — | +48 | -61 | +33 | 39.0% | -0.74 | 6–4 (60%) | 4–8 (33%) | 101.6 | +0.59 | 2008 | 1571 | 121.1 | -2.19 | +0.77 | 0.946 | 48.8% | +20 | — | -60 | 48.9% | -0.30 | 2–3 (40%) | 2–1 (67%) | 100.8 | -0.16 |
| 24 | 2003 | 1487 | 105.6 | -1.15 | -1.19 | 0.818 | 45.7% | +63 | -60 | — | 34.1% | -1.15 | 5–2 (71%) | 1–2 (33%) | 103.7 | +0.50 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2004 | 1476 | 98.9 | — | — | — | — | +53 | — | — | 42.9% | -1.14 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.25 | 2010 | 1552 | 102.9 | -1.56 | +0.46 | 0.603 | 39.8% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.25 | — | — | — | -0.09 |
| 26 | 2005 | 1436 | 98.5 | -1.59 | -0.98 | 0.589 | 41.8% | +59 | — | — | 0.0% | -3.25 | — | — | — | +0.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2006 | 1417 | 92.1 | -2.53 | -2.60 | 0.711 | 42.7% | +34 | — | — | 31.8% | -1.41 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.86 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2007 | 1432 | 105.1 | -3.06 | -2.30 | 0.825 | 45.7% | +9 | -20 | — | 30.4% | -1.24 | 0–2 | 0–3 (0%) | — | +0.53 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2008 | 1446 | 109.4 | -1.91 | -2.31 | 0.804 | 45.4% | -9 | — | — | 38.1% | -0.81 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–1 (67%) | 101.4 | -0.13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2009 | 1425 | 92.1 | -2.59 | -2.91 | 0.698 | 41.9% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.75 | — | — | — | -0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2010 | 1418 | 98.0 | -0.33 | -1.08 | 0.655 | 39.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1625 | 110.1 | -2.44 | -2.18 | 0.790 | 44.9% | +37 | -58 | +33 | 35.5% | -1.05 | 18–21 (46%) | 10–19 (34%) | 98.3 | +1.72 | — | 1681 | 124.5 | -1.85 | -0.57 | 0.895 | 47.5% | +2 | +64 | -60 | 42.4% | -0.63 | 7–21 (25%) | 12–12 (50%) | 92.7 | -0.05 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meilen Tu | 1 | 3 | 4 | Mar 6, 2007 | H2H |
| Martina Müller | 0 | 3 | 3 | Sep 13, 2007 | H2H |
| Sania Mirza | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jun 10, 2009 | H2H |
| Raluca Olaru | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jun 11, 2008 | H2H |
| Sofia Arvidsson | 1 | 1 | 2 | Mar 25, 2008 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatiana Perebiynis | 1 | 3 | 4 | May 22, 2008 | H2H |
| Jill Craybas | 1 | 3 | 4 | Aug 2, 2006 | H2H |
| Meilen Tu | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jan 11, 2008 | H2H |
| Emilie Loit | 3 | 0 | 3 | Jan 3, 2008 | H2H |
| Aleksandra Wozniak | 1 | 2 | 3 | Nov 1, 2007 | H2H |