H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Tatjana Maria vs Amélie Mauresmo H2H: 0-1

Amélie Mauresmo holds a 1–0 lead over Tatjana Maria in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Amélie Mauresmo leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2009 US Open first round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tatjana Maria
Germany Age 39 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Amélie Mauresmo
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amélie Mauresmo #17 6-3 6-4 Tatjana Maria #66 Match data Sep 2, 2009* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tatjana Maria #83 #36 1,320 1,822 164 261 38.6% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,225 463 185 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tatjana Maria Amélie Mauresmo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,556 0 0
18 2006 0–2 0.0% #136 1,481 0 0 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,728 0 0
19 2007 4–11 26.7% #89 1,452 0 0 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,911 0 1
20 2008 1–7 12.5% #223 1,423 0 0 2000 26–13 66.7% #16 1,906 0 2
21 2009 6–9 40.0% #71 1,493 0 0 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,022 0 6
22 2010 8–16 33.3% #137 1,496 0 0 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,061 0 8
23 2011 0–2 0.0% #203 1,468 0 0 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,065 0 10
24 2012 2–3 40.0% #112 1,473 0 0 2004 61–12 83.6% #2 2,178 0 15
25 2013 1–6 14.3% #268 1,437 0 0 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,133 0 19
26 2014 2–3 40.0% #160 1,446 0 0 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,165 2 23
27 2015 10–16 38.5% #74 1,478 0 0 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,972 2 24
28 2016 4–15 21.1% #115 1,466 0 0 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,820 2 24
29 2017 14–17 45.2% #47 1,565 0 0 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,873 2 25
30 2018 12–23 34.3% #72 1,632 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2019 12–20 37.5% #86 1,577 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2020 2–5 28.6% #109 1,586 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2022 17–11 60.7% #68 1,653 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2023 24–25 49.0% #54 1,704 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 2024 13–27 32.5% #86 1,576 0 3 — — — — — — —
37 2025 14–19 42.4% #45 1,638 0 4 — — — — — — —
38 2026 18–24 42.9% #83 1,794 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tatjana Maria Amélie Mauresmo
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
18 2006 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 9 7 16 56.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
19 2007 0 3 3 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1999 19 7 26 73.1% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7%
20 2008 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 8 5 13 61.5% 13 4 17 76.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 2009 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2001 15 7 22 68.2% 16 3 19 84.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9%
22 2010 4 8 12 33.3% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2002 25 5 30 83.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 3 9 66.7%
23 2011 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 23 11 34 67.6% 15 3 18 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
24 2012 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 35 7 42 83.3% 19 3 22 86.4% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
25 2013 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 36 10 46 78.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 2014 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 32 10 42 76.2% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 5 1 6 83.3%
27 2015 3 6 9 33.3% 4 7 11 36.4% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2007 13 7 20 65.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
28 2016 1 8 9 11.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 21 14 35 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
29 2017 7 9 16 43.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2009 12 7 19 63.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 0 5 100.0%
30 2018 4 17 21 19.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2019 8 12 20 40.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 6 6 12 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 14 16 30 46.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 8 15 23 34.8% 4 9 13 30.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 7 13 20 35.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 4 13 17 23.5% 6 7 13 46.2% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 76 152 228 33.3% 52 79 131 39.7% 36 30 66 54.5% — — — — — 248 97 345 71.9% 118 46 164 72.0% 44 19 63 69.8% 53 23 76 69.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 320/357 of Tatjana Maria's and 222/395 of Amélie Mauresmo's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tatjana Maria Amélie Mauresmo
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 10/62 2.3 2.9 63.3% 73.3% 50.3% 41.3% 41.8% 65.2% 48.3%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 18/73 4.5 4.4 58.2% 74.6% 52.0% 54.6% 50.2% 65.2% 51.1%
25 2013 2/7 3.5 6.0 58.2% 51.5% 38.5% 58.6% 33.3% 45.9% 32.1% 2005 24/69 3.2 4.3 58.0% 72.7% 50.1% 57.2% 55.5% 63.0% 47.6%
26 2014 5/5 6.4 4.2 50.8% 62.2% 39.2% 46.8% 53.3% 51.2% 41.2% 2006 55/64 2.6 2.9 64.8% 68.0% 49.1% 60.4% 53.9% 61.2% 47.1%
27 2015 23/26 3.2 2.9 54.7% 68.0% 50.1% 58.5% 46.8% 59.8% 39.4% 2007 36/41 4.4 4.8 61.2% 69.9% 45.6% 56.1% 53.4% 60.6% 45.7%
28 2016 18/19 3.2 2.2 60.4% 59.2% 45.0% 47.9% 47.3% 53.6% 38.9% 2008 45/49 3.3 6.3 61.4% 67.4% 43.0% 56.0% 51.2% 57.9% 47.5%
29 2017 30/31 3.2 2.2 56.2% 69.6% 44.9% 57.7% 48.4% 58.7% 42.3% 2009 34/37 4.0 5.5 60.2% 67.0% 45.7% 55.9% 48.6% 58.9% 45.1%
30 2018 34/35 4.0 2.7 56.2% 63.7% 43.5% 50.8% 47.7% 54.5% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2019 31/32 3.4 2.7 54.1% 63.3% 42.7% 48.7% 43.2% 54.0% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 7/7 3.6 2.6 60.9% 53.6% 39.4% 47.2% 30.6% 47.8% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 27/29 3.9 3.5 53.3% 71.0% 49.3% 55.7% 50.1% 60.8% 43.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 48/49 3.9 2.9 55.1% 65.7% 44.8% 49.5% 56.1% 56.5% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 39/41 3.4 2.9 54.9% 60.2% 41.7% 45.7% 40.6% 52.2% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 15/33 4.7 2.9 57.3% 59.9% 42.1% 43.5% 43.4% 52.1% 41.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 41/43 4.3 2.3 60.0% 67.0% 44.1% 53.1% 50.2% 57.7% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 320/428 3.8 2.8 56.1% 64.7% 44.4% 51.1% 47.6% 55.8% 41.2% — 222/648 3.5 4.6 61.5% 69.3% 47.2% 56.4% 51.8% 60.8% 47.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tatjana Maria Amélie Mauresmo
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1488 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.12
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1523 102.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.20 1–1 — — +0.03
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1556 126.4 — — — — -24 +36 — 48.0% -0.08 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 97.2 -0.06
18 2006 1481 99.5 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.16 1998 1729 146.0 — — — — -83 0 -114 51.2% +0.12 5–3 (63%) 5–4 (56%) 107.0 -0.59
19 2007 1452 109.9 — — — — +12 +66 +133 26.7% -1.40 0–2 — — -0.16 1999 1912 159.1 — — — — -27 -138 — 61.2% +0.73 12–5 (71%) 5–5 (50%) 109.0 +1.67
20 2008 1424 111.5 — — — — +28 — — 17.6% -2.06 0–1 0–1 — -0.49 2000 1907 163.5 — — — — -30 +17 — 64.6% +1.38 5–7 (42%) 4–7 (36%) 93.9 -1.71
21 2009 1493 111.4 — — — — -29 +34 — 36.4% -1.18 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — -0.55 2001 2023 167.1 — — — — -34 +99 -402 70.7% +1.41 14–3 (82%) 10–3 (77%) 113.0 -2.74
22 2010 1497 109.5 — — — — -12 -1 — 35.7% -1.07 4–4 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 100.3 -0.82 2002 2062 162.6 — — — — +32 -20 -255 74.0% +1.75 6–7 (46%) 10–5 (67%) 98.8 -0.13
23 2011 1469 95.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.16 2003 2065 163.0 +5.99 +3.35 1.388 56.1% +3 +92 — 69.4% +1.11 13–5 (72%) 13–2 (87%) 108.6 -2.28
24 2012 1473 101.7 — — — — -16 — — 41.7% -0.67 1–1 1–1 — +0.36 2004 2178 168.3 +7.28 +5.47 1.468 57.6% +1 +37 -262 78.5% +2.20 14–6 (70%) 8–5 (62%) 104.3 -0.48
25 2013 1438 94.6 -2.28 -2.31 0.593 40.1% +20 +16 — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 0–1 — -0.01 2005 2133 167.1 +5.80 +3.65 1.286 55.4% +23 +95 -185 72.0% +1.48 10–6 (63%) 7–2 (78%) 102.5 -0.83
26 2014 1447 95.9 -2.52 -1.88 0.844 46.7% +20 — — 36.4% -1.09 1–0 1–1 — +0.29 2006 2166 170.3 +5.44 +4.78 1.215 54.1% +18 +5 -62 70.5% +1.49 15–4 (79%) 8–3 (73%) 108.7 -3.85
27 2015 1479 110.7 +0.60 -1.33 0.980 49.7% -7 -43 +112 43.1% -0.31 1–5 (17%) 4–2 (67%) 99.3 +0.67 2007 1973 149.7 +4.23 +2.32 1.159 53.0% +81 +133 +141 63.4% +1.04 6–9 (40%) 6–8 (43%) 89.6 -1.04
28 2016 1466 112.4 -1.11 -3.07 0.839 46.4% -9 -23 — 24.4% -1.59 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 97.2 +0.04 2008 1820 135.6 +2.15 +2.79 1.128 52.5% +25 +198 +234 56.9% +0.66 14–8 (64%) 8–9 (47%) 94.5 +0.52
29 2017 1566 124.1 +1.13 -0.63 1.024 51.0% -48 -14 -21 46.0% -0.06 0–5 (0%) 1–0 — +0.89 2009 1873 146.4 +3.25 +2.00 1.095 52.0% +15 +92 +120 61.4% +0.83 12–4 (75%) 5–5 (50%) 103.7 -1.60
30 2018 1632 116.0 -1.90 -3.62 0.840 46.7% -69 -111 +75 35.8% -1.16 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 104.4 -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2019 1578 121.2 -1.61 -2.85 0.849 46.9% +26 -142 +163 42.3% -0.79 3–6 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 98.1 -0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 1587 109.8 -3.38 -1.03 0.757 43.7% +15 — — 25.0% -2.19 2–0 1–1 — -0.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 1511 98.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 1653 128.1 +2.42 +0.72 1.120 52.4% -89 -82 +219 60.0% +0.86 6–5 (55%) 3–4 (43%) 103.4 +1.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 1705 130.4 +0.14 +0.47 1.013 50.4% -13 -95 +119 50.0% +0.10 6–10 (38%) 5–6 (45%) 94.6 +1.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 1576 112.0 -3.26 -2.66 0.853 46.5% +21 -40 +207 33.0% -1.51 5–7 (42%) 5–4 (56%) 97.1 +1.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 1638 121.0 -2.97 -1.00 0.857 46.5% -65 -154 +320 44.7% -0.55 4–6 (40%) 9–8 (53%) 99.6 +0.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 1795 129.7 +0.55 -0.13 1.009 50.2% -227 -248 +315 44.9% -0.19 1–6 (14%) 3–4 (43%) 96.0 +0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1822 123.0 -0.64 -1.31 0.932 48.7% -36 -65 +192 40.4% -0.69 44–69 (39%) 44–49 (47%) 97.2 +0.95 — 2226 166.5 +4.45 +3.42 1.200 53.8% +5 +46 -86 66.9% +1.23 128–73 (64%) 90–60 (60%) 108.0 -2.04

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.