H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Tatjana Maria vs Ekaterina Makarova H2H: 0-1

Ekaterina Makarova holds a 1–0 lead over Tatjana Maria in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ekaterina Makarova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ekaterina Makarova won the 2016 Australian Open second round 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tatjana Maria
Germany Age 39 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Ekaterina Makarova
RUS Age 38 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ekaterina Makarova #24 6-4 6-2 Tatjana Maria #73 Match data Jan 21, 2016* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tatjana Maria #83 #36 1,320 1,822 164 261 38.6% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Ekaterina Makarova #1,000 #8 3,620 1,942 252 225 52.8% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tatjana Maria Ekaterina Makarova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2006 0–2 0.0% #136 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2007 4–11 26.7% #89 1,452 0 0 2007 2–2 50.0% #110 1,536 0 0
20 2008 1–7 12.5% #223 1,423 0 0 2008 17–20 45.9% #46 1,626 0 0
21 2009 6–9 40.0% #71 1,493 0 0 2009 19–22 46.3% #60 1,634 0 0
22 2010 8–16 33.3% #137 1,496 0 0 2010 14–20 41.2% #49 1,663 0 1
23 2011 0–2 0.0% #203 1,468 0 0 2011 15–23 39.5% #53 1,606 0 1
24 2012 2–3 40.0% #112 1,473 0 0 2012 26–19 57.8% #20 1,757 0 1
25 2013 1–6 14.3% #268 1,437 0 0 2013 24–18 57.1% #24 1,836 0 1
26 2014 2–3 40.0% #160 1,446 0 0 2014 39–21 65.0% #11 1,840 0 2
27 2015 10–16 38.5% #74 1,478 0 0 2015 26–16 61.9% #23 1,794 0 2
28 2016 4–15 21.1% #115 1,466 0 0 2016 27–21 56.2% #30 1,776 0 2
29 2017 14–17 45.2% #47 1,565 0 0 2017 27–21 56.2% #33 1,840 0 3
30 2018 12–23 34.3% #72 1,632 0 1 2018 16–19 45.7% #57 1,756 0 3
31 2019 12–20 37.5% #86 1,577 0 1 2019 0–3 0.0% #997 1,707 0 3
32 2020 2–5 28.6% #109 1,586 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2022 17–11 60.7% #68 1,653 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2023 24–25 49.0% #54 1,704 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 2024 13–27 32.5% #86 1,576 0 3 — — — — — — —
37 2025 14–19 42.4% #45 1,638 0 4 — — — — — — —
38 2026 18–24 42.9% #83 1,794 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tatjana Maria Ekaterina Makarova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2006 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2007 0 3 3 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2007 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2008 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 9 13 22 40.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
21 2009 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2009 7 14 21 33.3% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2010 4 8 12 33.3% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 6 14 20 30.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
23 2011 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 9 15 24 37.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2012 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 17 12 29 58.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
25 2013 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 17 11 28 60.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
26 2014 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 30 15 45 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
27 2015 3 6 9 33.3% 4 7 11 36.4% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2015 18 9 27 66.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 2016 1 8 9 11.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2016 17 14 31 54.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
29 2017 7 9 16 43.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2017 21 14 35 60.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 2018 4 17 21 19.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2018 12 13 25 48.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
31 2019 8 12 20 40.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2019 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 6 6 12 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 14 16 30 46.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 8 15 23 34.8% 4 9 13 30.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 7 13 20 35.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 4 13 17 23.5% 6 7 13 46.2% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 76 152 228 33.3% 52 79 131 39.7% 36 30 66 54.5% — — — — — 165 149 314 52.5% 45 46 91 49.5% 42 28 70 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 320/357 of Tatjana Maria's and 442/477 of Ekaterina Makarova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tatjana Maria Ekaterina Makarova
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 4/4 2.3 2.5 66.4% 54.5% 37.8% 48.4% 66.9% 48.3% 39.8%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 30/37 2.6 2.5 60.2% 62.5% 44.2% 40.5% 45.0% 55.1% 43.0%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 39/41 2.2 4.0 58.6% 64.0% 40.9% 48.2% 50.2% 54.2% 43.9%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 31/34 2.5 2.1 59.6% 59.5% 47.6% 57.5% 52.7% 54.8% 41.5%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 36/38 2.5 2.4 60.5% 64.0% 43.2% 47.4% 47.1% 55.6% 39.4%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 45/45 2.1 2.0 62.9% 64.9% 50.6% 55.1% 49.3% 59.5% 43.6%
25 2013 2/7 3.5 6.0 58.2% 51.5% 38.5% 58.6% 33.3% 45.9% 32.1% 2013 41/42 2.9 2.1 64.4% 66.3% 47.4% 57.6% 50.6% 59.3% 45.1%
26 2014 5/5 6.4 4.2 50.8% 62.2% 39.2% 46.8% 53.3% 51.2% 41.2% 2014 56/60 2.6 2.1 64.0% 65.1% 47.7% 59.9% 44.7% 58.9% 45.0%
27 2015 23/26 3.2 2.9 54.7% 68.0% 50.1% 58.5% 46.8% 59.8% 39.4% 2015 36/42 2.1 1.8 66.0% 65.8% 54.1% 55.9% 53.9% 61.6% 43.2%
28 2016 18/19 3.2 2.2 60.4% 59.2% 45.0% 47.9% 47.3% 53.6% 38.9% 2016 40/48 2.5 2.8 65.6% 65.1% 47.3% 58.4% 53.6% 59.0% 42.4%
29 2017 30/31 3.2 2.2 56.2% 69.6% 44.9% 57.7% 48.4% 58.7% 42.3% 2017 47/48 2.9 2.9 65.5% 64.2% 45.5% 52.2% 45.3% 57.7% 43.3%
30 2018 34/35 4.0 2.7 56.2% 63.7% 43.5% 50.8% 47.7% 54.5% 38.2% 2018 34/35 2.4 4.1 64.4% 63.8% 43.6% 56.6% 44.0% 56.6% 41.5%
31 2019 31/32 3.4 2.7 54.1% 63.3% 42.7% 48.7% 43.2% 54.0% 39.1% 2019 3/3 3.3 3.0 67.3% 61.0% 43.4% 52.0% 36.3% 55.6% 38.7%
32 2020 7/7 3.6 2.6 60.9% 53.6% 39.4% 47.2% 30.6% 47.8% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 27/29 3.9 3.5 53.3% 71.0% 49.3% 55.7% 50.1% 60.8% 43.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 48/49 3.9 2.9 55.1% 65.7% 44.8% 49.5% 56.1% 56.5% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 39/41 3.4 2.9 54.9% 60.2% 41.7% 45.7% 40.6% 52.2% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 15/33 4.7 2.9 57.3% 59.9% 42.1% 43.5% 43.4% 52.1% 41.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 41/43 4.3 2.3 60.0% 67.0% 44.1% 53.1% 50.2% 57.7% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 320/428 3.8 2.8 56.1% 64.7% 44.4% 51.1% 47.6% 55.8% 41.2% — 442/477 2.5 2.6 63.2% 64.2% 46.6% 54.0% 48.7% 57.6% 43.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tatjana Maria Ekaterina Makarova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2006 1481 99.5 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2007 1452 109.9 — — — — +12 +66 +133 26.7% -1.40 0–2 — — -0.16 2007 1536 118.3 +1.82 -0.84 0.769 44.4% +21 — — 40.0% -1.10 2–0 — — -0.12
20 2008 1424 111.5 — — — — +28 — — 17.6% -2.06 0–1 0–1 — -0.49 2008 1626 124.1 -0.08 -0.65 0.958 48.7% -33 -52 +24 46.5% -0.34 6–6 (50%) 4–5 (44%) 102.4 -0.55
21 2009 1493 111.4 — — — — -29 +34 — 36.4% -1.18 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — -0.55 2009 1634 131.6 -1.02 +0.38 0.960 49.1% -45 +48 +32 47.4% -0.49 7–8 (47%) 7–0 (100%) 107.5 -0.92
22 2010 1497 109.5 — — — — -12 -1 — 35.7% -1.07 4–4 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 100.3 -0.82 2010 1663 122.5 -0.26 -1.13 0.918 48.3% -104 -64 +173 45.5% -0.53 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) 98.1 -2.59
23 2011 1469 95.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.16 2011 1606 131.9 +0.66 -2.66 0.887 47.4% -47 +70 +141 40.9% -0.75 6–6 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 101.5 -1.38
24 2012 1473 101.7 — — — — -16 — — 41.7% -0.67 1–1 1–1 — +0.36 2012 1758 146.6 +3.45 +1.31 1.076 51.4% -30 -80 +28 57.1% +0.51 4–6 (40%) 4–6 (40%) 96.8 -2.49
25 2013 1438 94.6 -2.28 -2.31 0.593 40.1% +20 +16 — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 0–1 — -0.01 2013 1836 145.0 +3.78 +1.69 1.108 52.2% -22 -149 -40 59.3% +0.60 5–8 (38%) 3–6 (33%) 94.8 -1.08
26 2014 1447 95.9 -2.52 -1.88 0.844 46.7% +20 — — 36.4% -1.09 1–0 1–1 — +0.29 2014 1841 150.2 +3.13 +1.93 1.095 51.8% +1 -157 +25 60.2% +0.56 11–2 (85%) 5–6 (45%) 106.8 -1.18
27 2015 1479 110.7 +0.60 -1.33 0.980 49.7% -7 -43 +112 43.1% -0.31 1–5 (17%) 4–2 (67%) 99.3 +0.67 2015 1795 142.0 +3.14 +1.65 1.125 52.5% +49 -71 +5 64.8% +0.89 4–7 (36%) 5–1 (83%) 98.0 +1.69
28 2016 1466 112.4 -1.11 -3.07 0.839 46.4% -9 -23 — 24.4% -1.59 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 97.2 +0.04 2016 1776 140.5 +2.86 -0.13 1.035 50.8% +17 -78 +71 55.0% +0.41 8–9 (47%) 3–2 (60%) 96.7 +0.36
29 2017 1566 124.1 +1.13 -0.63 1.024 51.0% -48 -14 -21 46.0% -0.06 0–5 (0%) 1–0 — +0.89 2017 1841 148.6 +1.78 +0.54 1.022 50.2% +18 -103 -20 52.7% +0.19 10–6 (63%) 6–6 (50%) 104.6 -2.16
30 2018 1632 116.0 -1.90 -3.62 0.840 46.7% -69 -111 +75 35.8% -1.16 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 104.4 -0.09 2018 1757 140.7 +0.52 -0.09 0.957 49.2% +11 -59 +62 45.8% -0.40 7–6 (54%) 4–2 (67%) 101.3 -2.54
31 2019 1578 121.2 -1.61 -2.85 0.849 46.9% +26 -142 +163 42.3% -0.79 3–6 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 98.1 -0.64 2019 1707 109.2 -2.16 -1.63 0.871 47.4% +6 — — 25.0% -1.00 0–2 0–1 — 0.00
32 2020 1587 109.8 -3.38 -1.03 0.757 43.7% +15 — — 25.0% -2.19 2–0 1–1 — -0.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 1511 98.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 1653 128.1 +2.42 +0.72 1.120 52.4% -89 -82 +219 60.0% +0.86 6–5 (55%) 3–4 (43%) 103.4 +1.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 1705 130.4 +0.14 +0.47 1.013 50.4% -13 -95 +119 50.0% +0.10 6–10 (38%) 5–6 (45%) 94.6 +1.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 1576 112.0 -3.26 -2.66 0.853 46.5% +21 -40 +207 33.0% -1.51 5–7 (42%) 5–4 (56%) 97.1 +1.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 1638 121.0 -2.97 -1.00 0.857 46.5% -65 -154 +320 44.7% -0.55 4–6 (40%) 9–8 (53%) 99.6 +0.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 1795 129.7 +0.55 -0.13 1.009 50.2% -227 -248 +315 44.9% -0.19 1–6 (14%) 3–4 (43%) 96.0 +0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1822 123.0 -0.64 -1.31 0.932 48.7% -36 -65 +192 40.4% -0.69 44–69 (39%) 44–49 (47%) 97.2 +0.95 — 1942 146.2 +1.78 +0.38 1.014 50.2% -11 -55 +51 52.5% +0.08 72–73 (50%) 49–43 (53%) 104.0 -2.73

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.