Tatjana Maria
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sorana Cirstea | 1 | 5 | 6 | May 7, 2026 | H2H |
| Anna Bondar | 4 | 2 | 6 | Jan 14, 2026 | H2H |
| Yulia Putintseva | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jun 29, 2026 | H2H |
| Madison Keys | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jun 27, 2026 | H2H |
| Maria Sakkari | 2 | 3 | 5 | Jun 9, 2026 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Tatjana Maria vs Mirjam Bjorklund H2H: 1-0
Tatjana Maria holds a 1–0 lead over Mirjam Bjorklund in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tatjana Maria leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tatjana Maria won the 2022 Bogotá Open quarterfinal 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatjana Maria | 6-1 6-4 | Mirjam Bjorklund | Match data | Apr 9, 2022* | QF | Bogotá Open | WTA 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatjana Maria | #83 | #36 | 1,320 | 1,822 | 164 | 261 | 38.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Mirjam Bjorklund | #766 | #123 | 527 | 1,617 | 6 | 11 | 35.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tatjana Maria | Mirjam Bjorklund | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #136 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #620 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2007 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #89 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2008 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #223 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2009 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #71 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2010 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #137 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #157 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #112 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #166 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #268 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #160 | 1,446 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2015 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #74 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2016 | 4–15 | 21.1% | #115 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2017 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #47 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2018 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #72 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2019 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #86 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #109 | 1,586 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #68 | 1,653 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #54 | 1,704 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 13–27 | 32.5% | #86 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #45 | 1,638 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2026 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #83 | 1,794 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Tatjana Maria | Mirjam Bjorklund | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | 2006 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2007 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2008 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2009 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2010 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2011 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 2012 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2013 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2014 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2015 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2016 | 1 | 8 | 9 | 11.1% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2017 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2018 | 4 | 17 | 21 | 19.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2019 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 14 | 16 | 30 | 46.7% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 8 | 15 | 23 | 34.8% | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 7 | 13 | 20 | 35.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2026 | 4 | 13 | 17 | 23.5% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 76 | 152 | 228 | 33.3% | 52 | 79 | 131 | 39.7% | 36 | 30 | 66 | 54.5% | — | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Tatjana Maria | Mirjam Bjorklund | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | 2006 | 1481 | 99.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.00 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.16 | 2017 | 1484 | 99.9 | +0.76 | -0.38 | 0.976 | 49.3% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.67 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.14 |
| 19 | 2007 | 1452 | 109.9 | — | — | — | — | +12 | +66 | +133 | 26.7% | -1.40 | 0–2 | — | — | -0.16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2008 | 1424 | 111.5 | — | — | — | — | +28 | — | — | 17.6% | -2.06 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.49 | 2019 | 1485 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2009 | 1493 | 111.4 | — | — | — | — | -29 | +34 | — | 36.4% | -1.18 | 3–2 (60%) | 1–1 | — | -0.55 | 2020 | 1463 | 95.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2010 | 1497 | 109.5 | — | — | — | — | -12 | -1 | — | 35.7% | -1.07 | 4–4 (50%) | 1–4 (20%) | 100.3 | -0.82 | 2021 | 1426 | 96.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2011 | 1469 | 95.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.16 | 2022 | 1514 | 112.6 | -0.50 | -0.98 | 0.901 | 48.2% | — | +31 | — | 33.3% | -0.60 | 0–1 | 0–3 (0%) | — | +0.13 |
| 24 | 2012 | 1473 | 101.7 | — | — | — | — | -16 | — | — | 41.7% | -0.67 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.36 | 2023 | 1565 | 120.0 | +0.11 | -0.77 | 0.965 | 49.8% | -11 | — | — | 40.9% | -0.23 | 3–1 (75%) | 1–3 (25%) | — | -0.12 |
| 25 | 2013 | 1438 | 94.6 | -2.28 | -2.31 | 0.593 | 40.1% | +20 | +16 | — | 20.0% | -2.40 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.01 | 2024 | 1507 | 97.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2014 | 1447 | 95.9 | -2.52 | -1.88 | 0.844 | 46.7% | +20 | — | — | 36.4% | -1.09 | 1–0 | 1–1 | — | +0.29 | 2025 | 1485 | 103.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2015 | 1479 | 110.7 | +0.60 | -1.33 | 0.980 | 49.7% | -7 | -43 | +112 | 43.1% | -0.31 | 1–5 (17%) | 4–2 (67%) | 99.3 | +0.67 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2016 | 1466 | 112.4 | -1.11 | -3.07 | 0.839 | 46.4% | -9 | -23 | — | 24.4% | -1.59 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–4 (20%) | 97.2 | +0.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2017 | 1566 | 124.1 | +1.13 | -0.63 | 1.024 | 51.0% | -48 | -14 | -21 | 46.0% | -0.06 | 0–5 (0%) | 1–0 | — | +0.89 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2018 | 1632 | 116.0 | -1.90 | -3.62 | 0.840 | 46.7% | -69 | -111 | +75 | 35.8% | -1.16 | 6–5 (55%) | 3–3 (50%) | 104.4 | -0.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2019 | 1578 | 121.2 | -1.61 | -2.85 | 0.849 | 46.9% | +26 | -142 | +163 | 42.3% | -0.79 | 3–6 (33%) | 5–3 (63%) | 98.1 | -0.64 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 1587 | 109.8 | -3.38 | -1.03 | 0.757 | 43.7% | +15 | — | — | 25.0% | -2.19 | 2–0 | 1–1 | — | -0.80 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2021 | 1511 | 98.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 1653 | 128.1 | +2.42 | +0.72 | 1.120 | 52.4% | -89 | -82 | +219 | 60.0% | +0.86 | 6–5 (55%) | 3–4 (43%) | 103.4 | +1.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 1705 | 130.4 | +0.14 | +0.47 | 1.013 | 50.4% | -13 | -95 | +119 | 50.0% | +0.10 | 6–10 (38%) | 5–6 (45%) | 94.6 | +1.59 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 1576 | 112.0 | -3.26 | -2.66 | 0.853 | 46.5% | +21 | -40 | +207 | 33.0% | -1.51 | 5–7 (42%) | 5–4 (56%) | 97.1 | +1.34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 1638 | 120.9 | -2.97 | -1.00 | 0.857 | 46.5% | -65 | -154 | +320 | 44.7% | -0.55 | 4–6 (40%) | 9–8 (53%) | 99.6 | +0.73 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2026 | 1795 | 129.7 | +0.55 | -0.13 | 1.009 | 50.2% | -226 | -248 | +315 | 44.9% | -0.19 | 1–6 (14%) | 3–4 (43%) | 96.0 | +0.32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1822 | 123.0 | -0.64 | -1.31 | 0.932 | 48.7% | -35 | -65 | +192 | 40.4% | -0.69 | 44–69 (39%) | 44–49 (47%) | 97.2 | +0.96 | — | 1617 | 110.9 | -0.10 | -0.83 | 0.940 | 49.1% | -11 | +31 | — | 37.5% | -0.40 | 3–3 (50%) | 1–7 (13%) | 98.9 | +0.88 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Mirjam Bjorklund
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Mertens | 1 | 1 | 2 | Aug 30, 2023 | H2H |
| Tamara Zidansek | 0 | 1 | 1 | Apr 7, 2023 | H2H |
| Jelena Ostapenko | 0 | 1 | 1 | Mar 24, 2023 | H2H |
| Jasmine Paolini | 1 | 0 | 1 | Mar 23, 2023 | H2H |
| Peyton Stearns | 0 | 1 | 1 | Mar 3, 2023 | H2H |