Tatjana Maria
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sorana Cirstea | 1 | 5 | 6 | May 7, 2026 | H2H |
| Anna Bondar | 4 | 2 | 6 | Jan 14, 2026 | H2H |
| Yulia Putintseva | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jun 29, 2026 | H2H |
| Madison Keys | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jun 27, 2026 | H2H |
| Maria Sakkari | 2 | 3 | 5 | Jun 9, 2026 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Nadia Petrova holds a 2–0 lead over Tatjana Maria in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nadia Petrova leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2010 Wimbledon first round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nadia Petrova | 6-4 6-3 | Tatjana Maria | Match data | Jun 23, 2010* | R128 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
| Nadia Petrova | 2-6 6-1 6-1 | Tatjana Maria | Match data | Oct 4, 2007* | R32 | Porsche Tennis Grand Prix | Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatjana Maria | #83 | #36 | 1,320 | 1,822 | 164 | 261 | 38.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Nadia Petrova | #578 | #3 | 3,882 | 2,089 | 444 | 278 | 61.5% | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 13 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tatjana Maria | Nadia Petrova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #145 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #93 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #136 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #60 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2007 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #89 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #223 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #112 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #71 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #12 | 1,921 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #137 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 40–25 | 61.5% | #12 | 1,879 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 56–25 | 69.1% | #9 | 1,971 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #112 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #6 | 1,999 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2013 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #268 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #14 | 1,918 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #160 | 1,446 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,925 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 2015 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #74 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #20 | 1,824 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2016 | 4–15 | 21.1% | #115 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #15 | 1,852 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 2017 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #47 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #29 | 1,786 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 2018 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #72 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #12 | 1,933 | 0 | 13 |
| 31 | 2019 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #86 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,725 | 0 | 13 |
| 32 | 2020 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #109 | 1,586 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #362 | 1,656 | 0 | 13 |
| 34 | 2022 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #68 | 1,653 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #54 | 1,704 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 13–27 | 32.5% | #86 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #45 | 1,638 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2026 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #83 | 1,794 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Tatjana Maria | Nadia Petrova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 18 | 2006 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 19 | 2007 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 8 | 11 | 19 | 42.1% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 20 | 2008 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 21 | 2009 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 20 | 11 | 31 | 64.5% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 22 | 2010 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 28 | 16 | 44 | 63.6% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 23 | 2011 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 34 | 17 | 51 | 66.7% | 15 | 5 | 20 | 75.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 24 | 2012 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 28 | 16 | 44 | 63.6% | 15 | 1 | 16 | 93.8% | — | — | — | — | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% |
| 25 | 2013 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 20 | 11 | 31 | 64.5% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 4 | 0 | 4 | 100.0% |
| 26 | 2014 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 34 | 17 | 51 | 66.7% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 27 | 2015 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 17 | 13 | 30 | 56.7% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2016 | 1 | 8 | 9 | 11.1% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 17 | 14 | 31 | 54.8% | 12 | 4 | 16 | 75.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2017 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 18 | 13 | 31 | 58.1% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 30 | 2018 | 4 | 17 | 21 | 19.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 20 | 11 | 31 | 64.5% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2019 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 14 | 16 | 30 | 46.7% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 8 | 15 | 23 | 34.8% | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 7 | 13 | 20 | 35.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2026 | 4 | 13 | 17 | 23.5% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 76 | 152 | 228 | 33.3% | 52 | 79 | 131 | 39.7% | 36 | 30 | 66 | 54.5% | — | — | — | — | — | 264 | 170 | 434 | 60.8% | 107 | 62 | 169 | 63.3% | 51 | 28 | 79 | 64.6% | 22 | 18 | 40 | 55.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 320/357 of Tatjana Maria's and 414/630 of Nadia Petrova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Tatjana Maria | Nadia Petrova | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 21 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 12/56 | 3.7 | 3.3 | 56.6% | 70.3% | 47.3% | 61.6% | 49.4% | 60.0% | 51.0% |
| 22 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 10/65 | 4.7 | 4.2 | 56.8% | 69.4% | 49.1% | 44.6% | 40.1% | 60.7% | 44.9% |
| 23 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 22/81 | 3.9 | 3.4 | 60.3% | 69.7% | 48.9% | 61.7% | 50.8% | 61.3% | 47.2% |
| 24 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 50/67 | 5.1 | 2.7 | 61.5% | 71.4% | 51.1% | 58.4% | 48.2% | 63.7% | 47.6% |
| 25 | 2013 | 2/7 | 3.5 | 6.0 | 58.2% | 51.5% | 38.5% | 58.6% | 33.3% | 45.9% | 32.1% | 2007 | 49/55 | 4.4 | 3.1 | 61.8% | 71.9% | 48.2% | 58.1% | 47.0% | 62.6% | 45.1% |
| 26 | 2014 | 5/5 | 6.4 | 4.2 | 50.8% | 62.2% | 39.2% | 46.8% | 53.3% | 51.2% | 41.2% | 2008 | 63/71 | 4.7 | 3.7 | 60.3% | 70.4% | 44.7% | 57.0% | 53.9% | 60.4% | 45.5% |
| 27 | 2015 | 23/26 | 3.2 | 2.9 | 54.7% | 68.0% | 50.1% | 58.5% | 46.8% | 59.8% | 39.4% | 2009 | 47/51 | 6.2 | 3.7 | 58.3% | 70.3% | 46.5% | 50.8% | 44.7% | 60.2% | 42.2% |
| 28 | 2016 | 18/19 | 3.2 | 2.2 | 60.4% | 59.2% | 45.0% | 47.9% | 47.3% | 53.6% | 38.9% | 2010 | 47/52 | 6.2 | 3.3 | 57.1% | 71.5% | 48.2% | 63.1% | 51.9% | 61.5% | 43.1% |
| 29 | 2017 | 30/31 | 3.2 | 2.2 | 56.2% | 69.6% | 44.9% | 57.7% | 48.4% | 58.7% | 42.3% | 2011 | 41/46 | 4.2 | 3.0 | 58.5% | 66.6% | 48.1% | 55.9% | 52.2% | 59.1% | 42.1% |
| 30 | 2018 | 34/35 | 4.0 | 2.7 | 56.2% | 63.7% | 43.5% | 50.8% | 47.7% | 54.5% | 38.2% | 2012 | 45/58 | 6.0 | 3.0 | 55.3% | 70.5% | 46.7% | 51.0% | 48.8% | 60.0% | 44.4% |
| 31 | 2019 | 31/32 | 3.4 | 2.7 | 54.1% | 63.3% | 42.7% | 48.7% | 43.2% | 54.0% | 39.1% | 2013 | 22/22 | 6.3 | 3.0 | 60.4% | 67.2% | 41.1% | 51.9% | 43.8% | 57.1% | 44.5% |
| 32 | 2020 | 7/7 | 3.6 | 2.6 | 60.9% | 53.6% | 39.4% | 47.2% | 30.6% | 47.8% | 39.6% | 2014 | 6/6 | 5.3 | 5.5 | 46.7% | 66.9% | 45.9% | 48.3% | 39.9% | 54.2% | 42.2% |
| 34 | 2022 | 27/29 | 3.9 | 3.5 | 53.3% | 71.0% | 49.3% | 55.7% | 50.1% | 60.8% | 43.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 48/49 | 3.9 | 2.9 | 55.1% | 65.7% | 44.8% | 49.5% | 56.1% | 56.5% | 44.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 39/41 | 3.4 | 2.9 | 54.9% | 60.2% | 41.7% | 45.7% | 40.6% | 52.2% | 40.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 15/33 | 4.7 | 2.9 | 57.3% | 59.9% | 42.1% | 43.5% | 43.4% | 52.1% | 41.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2026 | 41/43 | 4.3 | 2.3 | 60.0% | 67.0% | 44.1% | 53.1% | 50.2% | 57.7% | 42.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 320/428 | 3.8 | 2.8 | 56.1% | 64.7% | 44.4% | 51.1% | 47.6% | 55.8% | 41.2% | — | 414/722 | 5.2 | 3.3 | 58.9% | 70.2% | 47.3% | 56.2% | 49.0% | 60.8% | 44.7% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Tatjana Maria | Nadia Petrova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1536 | 108.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -1.10 | 2–0 | 1–1 | — | -0.21 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1568 | 119.8 | — | — | — | — | +27 | — | — | 38.9% | -1.06 | 1–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.10 |
| 18 | 2006 | 1481 | 99.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.00 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.16 | 2000 | 1625 | 137.4 | — | — | — | — | +80 | -140 | -67 | 48.4% | +0.27 | 4–8 (33%) | 1–4 (20%) | 94.3 | -0.47 |
| 19 | 2007 | 1452 | 109.9 | — | — | — | — | +12 | +66 | +133 | 26.7% | -1.40 | 0–2 | — | — | -0.16 | 2001 | 1683 | 138.0 | — | — | — | — | -59 | -20 | -54 | 49.4% | +0.35 | 5–6 (45%) | 2–11 (15%) | 96.0 | -0.89 |
| 20 | 2008 | 1424 | 111.5 | — | — | — | — | +28 | — | — | 17.6% | -2.06 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.49 | 2002 | 1745 | 137.3 | — | — | — | — | -48 | — | — | 59.1% | +0.68 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | -1.69 |
| 21 | 2009 | 1493 | 111.4 | — | — | — | — | -29 | +34 | — | 36.4% | -1.18 | 3–2 (60%) | 1–1 | — | -0.55 | 2003 | 1922 | 156.8 | +3.29 | +4.32 | 1.277 | 55.5% | -51 | -85 | -174 | 61.1% | +0.92 | 11–9 (55%) | 6–2 (75%) | 105.2 | -2.56 |
| 22 | 2010 | 1497 | 109.5 | — | — | — | — | -12 | -1 | — | 35.7% | -1.07 | 4–4 (50%) | 1–4 (20%) | 100.3 | -0.82 | 2004 | 1880 | 151.4 | +3.04 | +0.66 | 1.141 | 52.4% | +11 | -49 | -143 | 61.4% | +1.02 | 8–11 (42%) | 7–7 (50%) | 95.7 | +1.78 |
| 23 | 2011 | 1469 | 95.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.16 | 2005 | 1971 | 156.3 | +4.70 | +2.81 | 1.221 | 54.3% | -26 | +29 | -176 | 69.4% | +1.41 | 13–10 (57%) | 7–6 (54%) | 102.6 | +1.08 |
| 24 | 2012 | 1473 | 101.7 | — | — | — | — | -16 | — | — | 41.7% | -0.67 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.36 | 2006 | 1999 | 165.0 | +7.12 | +3.75 | 1.310 | 55.6% | -34 | +105 | — | 70.3% | +1.75 | 9–6 (60%) | 7–4 (64%) | 102.2 | +2.64 |
| 25 | 2013 | 1438 | 94.6 | -2.28 | -2.31 | 0.593 | 40.1% | +20 | +16 | — | 20.0% | -2.40 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.01 | 2007 | 1918 | 152.6 | +6.15 | +2.04 | 1.205 | 53.8% | +19 | +124 | -43 | 68.2% | +1.44 | 9–3 (75%) | 7–7 (50%) | 101.3 | -0.25 |
| 26 | 2014 | 1447 | 95.9 | -2.52 | -1.88 | 0.844 | 46.7% | +20 | — | — | 36.4% | -1.09 | 1–0 | 1–1 | — | +0.29 | 2008 | 1926 | 146.0 | +4.49 | +1.77 | 1.149 | 53.0% | -16 | +1 | +21 | 66.9% | +1.29 | 7–11 (39%) | 9–5 (64%) | 94.7 | +0.54 |
| 27 | 2015 | 1479 | 110.7 | +0.60 | -1.33 | 0.980 | 49.7% | -7 | -43 | +112 | 43.1% | -0.31 | 1–5 (17%) | 4–2 (67%) | 99.3 | +0.67 | 2009 | 1825 | 141.7 | +4.11 | -1.32 | 1.060 | 51.1% | +14 | +37 | +87 | 54.4% | +0.50 | 14–8 (64%) | 8–6 (57%) | 100.8 | +1.28 |
| 28 | 2016 | 1466 | 112.4 | -1.11 | -3.07 | 0.839 | 46.4% | -9 | -23 | — | 24.4% | -1.59 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–4 (20%) | 97.2 | +0.04 | 2010 | 1853 | 154.1 | +4.92 | +0.47 | 1.120 | 52.6% | -39 | +99 | +61 | 62.1% | +0.91 | 10–8 (56%) | 2–5 (29%) | 97.3 | -0.43 |
| 29 | 2017 | 1566 | 124.1 | +1.13 | -0.63 | 1.024 | 51.0% | -48 | -14 | -21 | 46.0% | -0.06 | 0–5 (0%) | 1–0 | — | +0.89 | 2011 | 1787 | 136.6 | +2.64 | -0.57 | 1.028 | 50.6% | -5 | +48 | +103 | 56.6% | +0.32 | 5–6 (45%) | 8–5 (62%) | 97.5 | +0.59 |
| 30 | 2018 | 1632 | 116.0 | -1.90 | -3.62 | 0.840 | 46.7% | -69 | -111 | +75 | 35.8% | -1.16 | 6–5 (55%) | 3–3 (50%) | 104.4 | -0.09 | 2012 | 1933 | 142.8 | +3.66 | +1.17 | 1.111 | 52.0% | -27 | -100 | +6 | 63.6% | +0.94 | 13–6 (68%) | 8–9 (47%) | 102.3 | +2.25 |
| 31 | 2019 | 1578 | 121.2 | -1.61 | -2.85 | 0.849 | 46.9% | +26 | -142 | +163 | 42.3% | -0.79 | 3–6 (33%) | 5–3 (63%) | 98.1 | -0.64 | 2013 | 1725 | 130.0 | +1.40 | +0.62 | 1.039 | 50.4% | +95 | +39 | — | 44.2% | +0.10 | 3–5 (38%) | 1–4 (20%) | 94.3 | +0.77 |
| 32 | 2020 | 1587 | 109.8 | -3.38 | -1.03 | 0.757 | 43.7% | +15 | — | — | 25.0% | -2.19 | 2–0 | 1–1 | — | -0.80 | 2014 | 1656 | 109.1 | -1.13 | -0.85 | 0.922 | 47.9% | +85 | — | — | 30.8% | -1.15 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–1 | — | -0.14 |
| 33 | 2021 | 1511 | 98.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 1653 | 128.1 | +2.42 | +0.72 | 1.120 | 52.4% | -89 | -82 | +219 | 60.0% | +0.86 | 6–5 (55%) | 3–4 (43%) | 103.4 | +1.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 1705 | 130.4 | +0.14 | +0.47 | 1.013 | 50.4% | -13 | -95 | +119 | 50.0% | +0.10 | 6–10 (38%) | 5–6 (45%) | 94.6 | +1.59 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 1576 | 112.0 | -3.26 | -2.66 | 0.853 | 46.5% | +21 | -40 | +207 | 33.0% | -1.51 | 5–7 (42%) | 5–4 (56%) | 97.1 | +1.34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 1638 | 121.0 | -2.97 | -1.00 | 0.857 | 46.5% | -65 | -154 | +320 | 44.7% | -0.55 | 4–6 (40%) | 9–8 (53%) | 99.6 | +0.70 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2026 | 1795 | 129.7 | +0.55 | -0.13 | 1.009 | 50.2% | -227 | -248 | +315 | 44.9% | -0.19 | 1–6 (14%) | 3–4 (43%) | 96.0 | +0.32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1822 | 123.0 | -0.64 | -1.31 | 0.932 | 48.7% | -36 | -65 | +192 | 40.4% | -0.69 | 44–69 (39%) | 44–49 (47%) | 97.2 | +0.95 | — | 2089 | 155.3 | +4.43 | +1.25 | 1.140 | 52.7% | -11 | +13 | -35 | 61.1% | +0.92 | 116–101 (53%) | 76–78 (49%) | 96.4 | +0.59 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sorana Cirstea | 1 | 5 | 6 | May 7, 2026 | H2H |
| Anna Bondar | 4 | 2 | 6 | Jan 14, 2026 | H2H |
| Yulia Putintseva | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jun 29, 2026 | H2H |
| Madison Keys | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jun 27, 2026 | H2H |
| Maria Sakkari | 2 | 3 | 5 | Jun 9, 2026 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justine Henin | 2 | 13 | 15 | Jun 26, 2010 | H2H |
| Patty Schnyder | 7 | 8 | 15 | Mar 13, 2010 | H2H |
| Ana Ivanovic | 5 | 9 | 14 | Apr 26, 2013 | H2H |
| Elena Dementieva | 4 | 8 | 12 | Jun 2, 2010 | H2H |
| Jie Zheng | 10 | 1 | 11 | Mar 20, 2013 | H2H |