H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Taylor Townsend vs Andrea Petkovic H2H: 0-1
Andrea Petkovic holds a 1–0 lead over Taylor Townsend in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrea Petkovic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrea Petkovic won the 2013 Charleston second round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 30
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2018 | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Taylor Townsend | 6-3 6-2 | Andrea Petkovic | Match data |
| Apr 3, 2013* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Andrea Petkovic | 6-3 6-0 | Taylor Townsend | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taylor Townsend | #80 | #46 | 1,267 | 1,859 | 68 | 85 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Andrea Petkovic | #139 | #9 | 4,640 | 1,990 | 273 | 225 | 54.8% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Taylor Townsend | Andrea Petkovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #365 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #104 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2015 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #309 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #135 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #94 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #55 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2018 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #90 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #32 | 1,796 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2019 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #81 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #10 | 1,975 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #89 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,857 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #43 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2022 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #133 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 39–22 | 63.9% | #13 | 1,826 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2023 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #81 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #24 | 1,685 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2024 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #68 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,702 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2025 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #117 | 1,828 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #99 | 1,631 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2026 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,814 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,700 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #78 | 1,712 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #102 | 1,697 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,730 | 0 | 7 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #139 | 1,707 | 0 | 7 |