H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Taylor Townsend vs Julia Goerges H2H: 2-0
Taylor Townsend holds a 2–0 lead over Julia Goerges in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Taylor Townsend leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Taylor Townsend won the 2019 Charleston third round 6-4 7-6(0).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 30
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2019* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Taylor Townsend | 6-4 7-6(0) | Julia Goerges | Match data |
| Jul 28, 2014 | Washington | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Taylor Townsend | 3-6 6-2 6-3 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taylor Townsend | #80 | #46 | 1,267 | 1,859 | 68 | 85 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Taylor Townsend | Julia Goerges | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #365 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #104 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #309 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #135 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #94 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #90 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #81 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #89 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 2022 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #133 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #81 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 2024 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #68 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 |
| 2025 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #117 | 1,828 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 |
| 2026 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,814 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 |