H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Taylor Townsend vs Katie Boulter H2H: 0-2
Katie Boulter holds a 2–0 lead over Taylor Townsend in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Katie Boulter leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Katie Boulter won the 2026 Madrid first round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 30
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 29
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2026 | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R128 | Clay | Katie Boulter | 6-4 6-2 | Taylor Townsend | Match data |
| Sep 28, 2024* | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Katie Boulter | 6-4 6-4 | Taylor Townsend | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taylor Townsend | #80 | #46 | 1,267 | 1,859 | 68 | 85 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Katie Boulter | #67 | #23 | 1,931 | 1,861 | 93 | 90 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Taylor Townsend | Katie Boulter | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #365 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #104 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2015 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #309 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2016 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #135 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #94 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #97 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #90 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #319 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #81 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #365 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #89 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #149 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #136 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #133 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #56 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2023 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #81 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #24 | 1,833 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2024 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #68 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #106 | 1,753 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2025 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #117 | 1,828 | 0 | 0 | 2026 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #67 | 1,793 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2026 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,814 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |