H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Tereza Martincova vs Irina Khromacheva H2H: 1-1
Tereza Martincova and Irina Khromacheva are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tereza Martincova leads 1–0 on clay, while Irina Khromacheva leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tereza Martincova won the 2017 Gstaad third round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 31
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 31
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2017* | Gstaad | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Tereza Martincova | 6-1 6-2 | Irina Khromacheva | Match data |
| Sep 28, 2016* | Tashkent | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Irina Khromacheva | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | Tereza Martincova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tereza Martincova | #283 | #40 | 1,293 | 1,800 | 70 | 102 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Irina Khromacheva | #1,089 | #89 | 697 | 1,561 | 7 | 18 | 28.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tereza Martincova | Irina Khromacheva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #296 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #243 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #180 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2016 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #163 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #95 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #142 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #183 | 1,411 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #197 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #135 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #135 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #431 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #120 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #639 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2021 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #48 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2022 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #71 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2023 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #155 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #525 | 1,402 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #331 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2026 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #283 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |