H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Tereza Martincova vs Pauline Parmentier
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Tereza Martincova vs Pauline Parmentier.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 31
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 40
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tereza Martincova | #283 | #40 | 1,293 | 1,800 | 70 | 102 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Pauline Parmentier | #346 | #40 | 1,121 | 1,702 | 121 | 188 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tereza Martincova | Pauline Parmentier | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #296 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #180 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #163 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #57 | 1,612 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2017 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #142 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #61 | 1,585 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2018 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #197 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,536 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2019 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #135 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #105 | 1,444 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2020 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #120 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #74 | 1,441 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2021 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #48 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #65 | 1,567 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2022 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #71 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #229 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2023 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #155 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #80 | 1,523 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #331 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #120 | 1,460 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #70 | 1,580 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2026 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #283 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #79 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #56 | 1,682 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #123 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #173 | 1,544 | 0 | 4 |