H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Terry Phelps vs Grace Kim H2H: 1-0

Terry Phelps holds a 1–0 lead over Grace Kim in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Terry Phelps leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Terry Phelps won the 1984 Mahwah round of 64 6-0 3-6 6-3.

H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
USA Age 58

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Terry Phelps #42 6-0 3-6 6-3 Grace Kim Match data Aug 15, 1984* R64 Mahwah WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Terry Phelps #183 #20 32 1,869 188 171 52.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Grace Kim 1,705 47 82 36.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Terry Phelps Grace Kim
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1982 7–3 70.0% 1,585 0 1
15 1982 10–3 76.9% 1,635 0 1 1983 2–4 33.3% 1,591 0 1
16 1983 9–15 37.5% 1,632 0 1 1984 6–10 37.5% 1,622 0 1
17 1984 30–25 54.5% #26 1,792 0 1 1985 17–25 40.5% 1,694 0 1
18 1985 25–22 53.2% #26 1,785 0 1 1986 10–22 31.2% 1,605 0 1
19 1986 33–26 55.9% #21 1,813 0 1 1987 5–13 27.8% 1,515 0 1
20 1987 24–22 52.2% #48 1,676 0 1 1988 0–5 0.0% 1,469 0 1
21 1988 25–20 55.6% #49 1,781 0 1
22 1989 20–21 48.8% #48 1,721 0 1
23 1990 12–17 41.4% #97 1,643 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Terry Phelps Grace Kim
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1982 6 1 7 85.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
15 1982 1 1 2 50.0% 1983 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1983 5 7 12 41.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
17 1984 9 7 16 56.3% 12 9 21 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1985 11 12 23 47.8% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
18 1985 8 8 16 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1986 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 11 16 31.3%
19 1986 11 7 18 61.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 1987 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0%
20 1987 13 11 24 54.2% 9 4 13 69.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
21 1988 20 11 31 64.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9%
22 1989 16 13 29 55.2% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1990 10 10 20 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
Career 92 74 166 55.4% 50 44 94 53.2% 15 23 38 39.5% 22 28 50 44.0% 28 35 63 44.4% 4 18 22 18.2% 3 10 13 23.1% 11 18 29 37.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Terry Phelps Grace Kim
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1982 1586 114.0 +73 66.7% +1.10 3–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) 103.8 +1.42
15 1982 1635 127.9 70.0% +1.60 3–1 (75%) 1–1 -0.35 1983 1592 115.9 +65 30.8% -1.00 1–0 -0.06
16 1983 1632 118.2 -17 -65 39.3% -0.75 4–4 (50%) 1–0 -0.62 1984 1622 113.8 +26 +18 36.6% -1.49 6–3 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 103.7 -0.48
17 1984 1792 137.0 -51 -87 -181 51.5% +0.16 14–8 (64%) 5–6 (45%) 108.5 -1.35 1985 1694 125.2 +52 -205 -135 43.4% -0.79 6–9 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 101.5 -0.64
18 1985 1785 137.0 -18 -22 -206 53.7% +0.21 6–8 (43%) 6–4 (60%) 101.4 -0.20 1986 1605 117.7 +47 -126 33.3% -1.54 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) 99.0 +0.32
19 1986 1814 147.3 +22 -28 -197 54.1% +0.18 10–7 (59%) 4–6 (40%) 98.8 -2.73 1987 1515 97.7 +45 -17 32.6% -1.47 3–4 (43%) 1–1 +2.17
20 1987 1677 131.3 +11 +131 -91 55.4% +0.63 3–8 (27%) 3–7 (30%) 89.9 +4.52 1988 1469 96.4 -61 0.0% -3.90 0–1 -0.26
21 1988 1782 139.2 +18 -35 -165 51.0% +0.47 9–1 (90%) 3–5 (38%) 106.4 +0.27
22 1989 1721 142.9 +81 -29 -131 50.5% -0.15 6–9 (40%) 5–5 (50%) 97.5 -1.97
23 1990 1643 118.3 +74 -57 40.6% -0.86 4–2 (67%) 4–3 (57%) 102.9 -0.26
Career 1870 141.5 +18 -21 -149 51.5% +0.14 59–48 (55%) 32–37 (46%) 102.5 -0.75 1705 119.1 +49 -161 -47 38.2% -1.14 21–19 (53%) 11–10 (52%) 103.5 +1.93

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.