H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Terry Phelps vs Leila Meskhi H2H: 1-2
Leila Meskhi holds a 2–1 lead over Terry Phelps in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Leila Meskhi leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Leila Meskhi won the 1989 Washington third round 2-6 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 59
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
GEO
Age 58
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 1989 | Washington | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Leila Meskhi | 2-6 6-1 6-2 | Terry Phelps | Match data |
| Sep 4, 1988* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Terry Phelps | 4-6 6-3 7-6(4) | Leila Meskhi | Match data |
| Oct 30, 1987* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Leila Meskhi | 6-2 6-4 | Terry Phelps | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terry Phelps | #183 | #20 | 32 | 1,869 | 188 | 171 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Leila Meskhi | #903 | #12 | 72 | 2,001 | 192 | 119 | 61.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Terry Phelps | Leila Meskhi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1982 | 10–3 | 76.9% | — | 1,635 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1983 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1984 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #26 | 1,792 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1985 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #26 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1986 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #21 | 1,812 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #46 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #48 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #49 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #30 | 1,794 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1989 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #48 | 1,720 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #19 | 1,928 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1990 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #97 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #15 | 1,937 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #22 | 1,939 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #37 | 1,874 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #34 | 1,843 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #141 | 1,834 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #838 | 1,748 | 0 | 5 |