H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Timea Babos vs Johanna Larsson H2H: 1-1
Timea Babos and Johanna Larsson are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Timea Babos won the 2017 Tashkent third round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HUN
Age 33
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 37
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2017* | Tashkent | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Timea Babos | 6-1 6-1 | Johanna Larsson | Match data |
| Mar 5, 2013* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Johanna Larsson | 6-7(5) 6-2 6-0 | Timea Babos | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Timea Babos | #453 | #25 | 1,675 | 1,768 | 123 | 177 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Johanna Larsson | #236 | #45 | 1,230 | 1,745 | 153 | 177 | 46.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Timea Babos | Johanna Larsson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #268 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #389 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2012 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #67 | 1,553 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #177 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #88 | 1,540 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #99 | 1,482 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #70 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #59 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #73 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #57 | 1,637 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #84 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #59 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #70 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #89 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #56 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2020 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #115 | 1,542 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 29–24 | 54.7% | #50 | 1,716 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2021 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #160 | 1,497 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #80 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #336 | 1,455 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #75 | 1,600 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2023 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #188 | 1,480 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #217 | 1,557 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,451 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 |