H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Mihaela Buzarnescu holds a 1–0 lead over Timea Babos in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mihaela Buzarnescu leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mihaela Buzarnescu won the 2018 Birmingham round of 32 6-3 4-6 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mihaela Buzarnescu | 6-3 4-6 6-0 | Timea Babos | Match data | Jun 21, 2018* | R32 | Birmingham | Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Timea Babos | #451 | #25 | 1,675 | 1,758 | 124 | 180 | 40.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Mihaela Buzarnescu | #798 | #20 | 2,068 | 1,883 | 60 | 65 | 48.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Timea Babos | Mihaela Buzarnescu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #268 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2012 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #67 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2013 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #88 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2014 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #99 | 1,484 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2015 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #70 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2016 | 35–28 | 55.6% | #28 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2017 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #57 | 1,639 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2018 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #59 | 1,609 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2019 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #89 | 1,594 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2020 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #115 | 1,540 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2021 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #160 | 1,495 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #336 | 1,454 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2023 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #188 | 1,480 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #24 | 1,807 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,450 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #113 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #137 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #122 | 1,640 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #404 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Timea Babos | Mihaela Buzarnescu | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 2010 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2011 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2012 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2013 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 35.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2014 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2015 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 35.3% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2016 | 25 | 19 | 44 | 56.8% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2017 | 19 | 17 | 36 | 52.8% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2018 | 17 | 16 | 33 | 51.5% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2019 | 5 | 13 | 18 | 27.8% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2020 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2021 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2022 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2023 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 13 | 10 | 23 | 56.5% | 14 | 8 | 22 | 63.6% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% |
| 31 | 2024 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 5 | 13 | 18 | 27.8% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 90 | 113 | 203 | 44.3% | 25 | 45 | 70 | 35.7% | 9 | 22 | 31 | 29.0% | — | 23 | 35 | 58 | 39.7% | 26 | 21 | 47 | 55.3% | 11 | 9 | 20 | 55.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 283/304 of Timea Babos's and 118/124 of Mihaela Buzarnescu's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Timea Babos | Mihaela Buzarnescu | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 17 | 2010 | 1/1 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 57.1% | 61.1% | 37.0% | 50.0% | 16.7% | 50.8% | 33.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2011 | 2/2 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 60.9% | 71.5% | 44.6% | 50.0% | 51.0% | 61.3% | 43.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2012 | 26/29 | 5.0 | 4.3 | 60.5% | 65.8% | 43.9% | 52.1% | 43.9% | 57.0% | 41.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2013 | 24/25 | 4.5 | 3.8 | 57.6% | 62.5% | 43.5% | 48.6% | 46.0% | 54.5% | 39.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2014 | 13/15 | 5.7 | 4.2 | 60.5% | 65.3% | 43.7% | 57.7% | 37.2% | 56.8% | 38.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2015 | 25/33 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 67.1% | 62.8% | 48.2% | 50.8% | 42.4% | 57.7% | 38.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2016 | 57/63 | 4.5 | 3.6 | 62.3% | 66.7% | 46.0% | 50.8% | 46.3% | 58.9% | 43.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2017 | 46/46 | 4.6 | 3.5 | 62.3% | 68.8% | 43.7% | 54.7% | 49.3% | 59.4% | 40.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2018 | 42/43 | 4.4 | 4.0 | 60.0% | 68.8% | 46.8% | 57.6% | 44.3% | 60.0% | 41.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2019 | 22/22 | 3.9 | 4.5 | 58.6% | 64.9% | 40.5% | 59.3% | 38.6% | 54.7% | 37.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2020 | 6/6 | 1.0 | 3.5 | 59.2% | 63.9% | 42.1% | 38.2% | 45.8% | 54.9% | 31.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2021 | 12/12 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 55.0% | 61.9% | 39.8% | 45.9% | 48.4% | 52.3% | 37.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2022 | 1/1 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 60.6% | 55.0% | 46.2% | 60.0% | 25.0% | 51.5% | 38.6% | 2017 | 6/6 | 3.0 | 3.2 | 67.2% | 62.5% | 48.8% | 53.1% | 35.0% | 58.2% | 41.5% |
| 30 | 2023 | 4/4 | 1.8 | 4.3 | 62.9% | 60.5% | 40.4% | 53.2% | 74.6% | 52.8% | 42.7% | 2018 | 54/58 | 2.3 | 3.2 | 62.2% | 63.4% | 48.4% | 50.2% | 47.1% | 57.8% | 45.1% |
| 31 | 2024 | 2/2 | 9.0 | 3.5 | 57.7% | 62.3% | 54.4% | 77.3% | 19.6% | 59.0% | 34.4% | 2019 | 36/36 | 1.6 | 4.5 | 61.7% | 62.7% | 42.7% | 53.3% | 52.5% | 54.9% | 41.4% |
| 32 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1/1 | 3.0 | 7.0 | 68.9% | 57.1% | 31.6% | 50.0% | 40.0% | 49.2% | 36.2% |
| 33 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 17/19 | 1.1 | 5.1 | 62.2% | 59.9% | 47.0% | 46.0% | 47.4% | 54.5% | 40.1% |
| 34 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 4/4 | 0.5 | 2.8 | 66.6% | 54.6% | 40.6% | 39.3% | 50.0% | 49.7% | 36.5% |
| Career | — | 283/304 | 4.3 | 3.8 | 61.0% | 66.0% | 44.6% | 53.1% | 45.0% | 57.6% | 40.4% | — | 118/125 | 1.9 | 3.9 | 62.5% | 62.3% | 46.1% | 50.3% | 48.2% | 56.1% | 42.7% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Timea Babos | Mihaela Buzarnescu | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 2010 | 1491 | 99.7 | +0.22 | -2.30 | 0.677 | 42.5% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2011 | 1503 | 104.3 | +0.80 | +0.51 | 1.109 | 51.4% | — | — | — | 60.0% | 0.00 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2012 | 1564 | 115.8 | +1.04 | -1.36 | 0.976 | 49.4% | +20 | -33 | +62 | 49.3% | -0.38 | 5–8 (38%) | 6–5 (55%) | 101.9 | +0.38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2013 | 1544 | 111.1 | -0.34 | -3.76 | 0.862 | 46.9% | +14 | +4 | — | 38.6% | -0.95 | 5–4 (56%) | 5–3 (63%) | 102.2 | -0.12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2014 | 1484 | 110.0 | -0.66 | -2.53 | 0.902 | 47.8% | -2 | — | +90 | 40.0% | -0.17 | 1–6 (14%) | 1–3 (25%) | 91.7 | +0.74 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2015 | 1563 | 124.4 | +0.04 | -1.97 | 0.900 | 47.9% | -39 | -34 | +34 | 38.2% | -0.59 | 5–5 (50%) | 4–8 (33%) | 99.5 | -2.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2016 | 1708 | 138.3 | +2.77 | +0.15 | 1.051 | 51.1% | -28 | -88 | -104 | 53.8% | +0.53 | 11–9 (55%) | 7–12 (37%) | 101.7 | -0.26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2017 | 1639 | 130.8 | +1.85 | -2.67 | 0.986 | 49.9% | +63 | -67 | -124 | 48.6% | -0.01 | 6–13 (32%) | 6–6 (50%) | 93.3 | +1.56 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2018 | 1610 | 134.0 | +2.55 | -1.23 | 1.046 | 50.9% | +53 | -69 | -106 | 50.0% | +0.25 | 3–11 (21%) | 3–7 (30%) | 88.6 | +0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2019 | 1595 | 114.5 | -1.44 | -4.46 | 0.838 | 46.6% | +29 | -87 | — | 35.4% | -1.15 | 1–7 (13%) | 3–3 (50%) | 93.4 | +0.77 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2020 | 1540 | 108.8 | +0.56 | -3.13 | 0.694 | 43.3% | +28 | — | — | 7.7% | -2.85 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2021 | 1496 | 105.1 | -3.04 | -3.61 | 0.789 | 45.0% | +56 | -88 | — | 29.2% | -1.79 | 1–1 | 2–0 | — | +0.01 | 2016 | 1485 | 97.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2022 | 1454 | 101.3 | +1.41 | -1.79 | 0.796 | 44.9% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | -0.06 | 2017 | 1573 | 120.2 | +0.92 | -0.16 | 0.992 | 49.4% | -14 | — | — | 42.9% | -0.29 | 2–0 | 3–3 (50%) | — | -0.47 |
| 30 | 2023 | 1481 | 113.2 | -0.36 | -1.04 | 0.905 | 48.0% | — | -15 | — | 33.3% | -1.11 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.04 | 2018 | 1808 | 137.2 | +1.56 | +2.47 | 1.069 | 51.3% | -121 | -68 | -54 | 58.8% | +0.57 | 12–7 (63%) | 8–5 (62%) | 107.6 | -1.35 |
| 31 | 2024 | 1451 | 103.6 | -0.62 | +0.09 | 0.841 | 46.5% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.60 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.13 | 2019 | 1638 | 120.0 | -1.04 | -1.58 | 0.917 | 48.4% | -54 | +59 | +91 | 38.8% | -0.69 | 3–9 (25%) | 2–3 (40%) | 92.2 | +0.04 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1623 | 99.7 | -2.53 | -0.84 | 0.712 | 42.9% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.07 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1640 | 125.0 | -1.96 | -2.07 | 0.883 | 47.2% | -37 | +90 | — | 41.3% | -0.94 | 3–5 (38%) | 2–3 (40%) | 99.4 | -0.31 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1609 | 93.0 | -1.53 | -3.06 | 0.725 | 43.9% | — | — | — | 25.0% | -2.25 | — | — | — | +0.26 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1534 | 79.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.18 |
| Career | — | 1758 | 128.1 | +1.05 | -1.91 | 0.952 | 49.0% | +18 | -54 | -13 | 44.6% | -0.28 | 38–68 (36%) | 39–50 (44%) | 90.6 | +0.30 | — | 1883 | 126.9 | +0.09 | +0.23 | 0.973 | 49.4% | -75 | +3 | -20 | 47.7% | -0.21 | 20–21 (49%) | 15–14 (52%) | 101.5 | -1.55 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kristina Mladenovic | 4 | 4 | 8 | Oct 12, 2018 | H2H |
| Roberta Vinci | 1 | 6 | 7 | Aug 16, 2017 | H2H |
| Carla Suárez Navarro | 1 | 4 | 5 | Aug 28, 2019 | H2H |
| Sara Errani | 3 | 2 | 5 | May 16, 2018 | H2H |
| Mona Barthel | 2 | 3 | 5 | Mar 22, 2018 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Ostapenko | 2 | 3 | 5 | Jun 26, 2019 | H2H |
| Ajla Tomljanovic | 3 | 0 | 3 | May 6, 2019 | H2H |
| Caroline Wozniacki | 0 | 3 | 3 | Apr 5, 2019 | H2H |
| Lesia Tsurenko | 2 | 1 | 3 | Dec 31, 2018 | H2H |
| Elina Svitolina | 2 | 1 | 3 | Aug 9, 2018 | H2H |