H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Timea Babos vs Naomi Broady H2H: 3-1
Timea Babos holds a 3–1 lead over Naomi Broady in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Timea Babos leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Naomi Broady leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Timea Babos won the 2018 Monterrey fourth round 6-3 6-7(6) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HUN
Age 33
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 36
Right-Handed
189 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2018* | Monterrey | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Timea Babos | 6-3 6-7(6) 7-5 | Naomi Broady | Match data |
| Sep 15, 2017* | Quebec City | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Timea Babos | 6-2 5-7 6-2 | Naomi Broady | Match data |
| Apr 7, 2017* | Monterrey | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Timea Babos | 6-3 6-2 | Naomi Broady | Match data |
| Jun 25, 2014* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Naomi Broady | 2-6 7-6(7) 6-0 | Timea Babos | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Timea Babos | #453 | #25 | 1,675 | 1,768 | 123 | 177 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Naomi Broady | #1,209 | #76 | 875 | 1,604 | 24 | 41 | 36.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Timea Babos | Naomi Broady | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #268 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2012 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #67 | 1,553 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #298 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #88 | 1,540 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #99 | 1,482 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #70 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2017 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #57 | 1,637 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #170 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #59 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #89 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #91 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2020 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #115 | 1,542 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #117 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2021 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #160 | 1,497 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #250 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #336 | 1,455 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2023 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #188 | 1,480 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,451 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |