H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Timea Babos vs Roberta Vinci H2H: 1-6

Roberta Vinci holds a 6–1 lead over Timea Babos in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Roberta Vinci leads 4–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Roberta Vinci won the 2017 Cincinnati second round 7-5 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Timea Babos
HUN Age 33 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 6
7 main draw meetings
Roberta Vinci
ITA Age 43 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 16, 2017* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R64 Hard Roberta Vinci #42 7-5 7-5 Timea Babos #51 Match data
Feb 2, 2017* St. Petersburg WTA 500 R32 Hard Roberta Vinci #21 6-3 3-6 6-4 Timea Babos #30 Match data
Feb 13, 2016* St. Petersburg WTA 500 QF Hard Roberta Vinci #16 7-6(3) 4-6 7-6(4) Timea Babos #51 Match data
Jul 16, 2015* Bucharest WTA 250 R32 Clay Roberta Vinci #45 6-2 6-1 Timea Babos #82 Match data
Jun 17, 2015* Birmingham WTA 500 R64 Grass Timea Babos #96 6-2 6-7(5) 7-6(5) Roberta Vinci #36 Match data
Aug 28, 2013* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Roberta Vinci #13 6-4 6-2 Timea Babos #107 Match data
Jul 8, 2011* Budapest WTA 250 R16 Clay Roberta Vinci #25 4-6 7-5 6-2 Timea Babos #231 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Timea Babos #453 #25 1,675 1,768 123 177 41.0% 0 0 0 1 2 3
Roberta Vinci #193 #7 3,615 1,923 320 287 52.7% 0 0 0 2 8 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Timea Babos Roberta Vinci
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2010 0–1 0.0% #268 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2011 1–1 50.0% #154 1,503 0 0 2001 1–2 33.3% #168 1,485 0 0
19 2012 13–14 48.1% #67 1,553 0 1 2002 3–5 37.5% #184 1,478 0 0
20 2013 9–16 36.0% #88 1,540 0 1 2003 2–2 50.0% #119 1,503 0 0
21 2014 4–11 26.7% #99 1,482 0 1 2004 4–8 33.3% #116 1,507 0 0
22 2015 12–21 36.4% #70 1,564 0 1 2005 15–17 46.9% #41 1,623 0 0
23 2016 35–27 56.5% #28 1,712 0 1 2006 10–16 38.5% #85 1,576 0 0
24 2017 20–26 43.5% #57 1,637 0 2 2007 11–17 39.3% #73 1,561 0 1
25 2018 19–23 45.2% #59 1,614 0 3 2008 5–6 45.5% #84 1,585 0 1
26 2019 6–16 27.3% #89 1,595 0 3 2009 23–23 50.0% #63 1,663 0 2
27 2020 0–6 0.0% #115 1,542 0 3 2010 28–20 58.3% #38 1,817 0 3
28 2021 3–9 25.0% #160 1,497 0 3 2011 37–24 60.7% #23 1,774 0 6
29 2022 0–1 0.0% #336 1,455 0 3 2012 44–27 62.0% #16 1,834 0 7
30 2023 1–3 25.0% #188 1,480 0 3 2013 46–23 66.7% #14 1,853 0 9
31 2024 0–2 0.0% #338 1,451 0 3 2014 21–26 44.7% #47 1,712 0 9
32 — — — — — — — 2015 31–26 54.4% #15 1,765 0 9
33 — — — — — — — 2016 28–22 56.0% #18 1,733 0 10
34 — — — — — — — 2017 10–20 33.3% #116 1,610 0 10
35 — — — — — — — 2018 1–3 25.0% #193 1,628 0 10