H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Timea Babos vs Roberta Vinci H2H: 1-6

Roberta Vinci holds a 6–1 lead over Timea Babos in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Roberta Vinci leads 4–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Roberta Vinci won the 2017 Cincinnati Open first round 7-5 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Timea Babos
Hungary Age 33 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 6
7 main-draw meetings
Roberta Vinci
ITA Age 43 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Roberta Vinci #42 7-5 7-5 Timea Babos #51 Match data Aug 16, 2017* R64 Cincinnati Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Roberta Vinci #21 6-3 3-6 6-4 Timea Babos #30 Match data Feb 2, 2017* R32 St. Petersburg Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Roberta Vinci #16 7-6(3) 4-6 7-6(4) Timea Babos #51 Match data Feb 13, 2016* QF St. Petersburg Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Roberta Vinci #45 6-2 6-1 Timea Babos #82 Match data Jul 16, 2015* R32 Bucharest International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Timea Babos #96 6-2 6-7(5) 7-6(5) Roberta Vinci #36 Match data Jun 17, 2015* R64 Birmingham Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Roberta Vinci #13 6-4 6-2 Timea Babos #107 Match data Aug 28, 2013* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Roberta Vinci #25 4-6 7-5 6-2 Timea Babos #231 Match data Jul 8, 2011* R16 Budapest International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Timea Babos #451 #25 1,675 1,758 124 180 40.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Roberta Vinci #193 #7 3,615 1,921 320 290 52.5% 0 0 0 1 9 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Timea Babos Roberta Vinci
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2010 0–1 0.0% #268 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2011 1–1 50.0% #154 1,503 0 0 2001 1–2 33.3% #168 1,485 0 0
19 2012 14–15 48.3% #67 1,564 0 1 2002 3–5 37.5% #184 1,478 0 0
20 2013 9–16 36.0% #88 1,544 0 1 2003 2–2 50.0% #119 1,502 0 0
21 2014 4–11 26.7% #99 1,484 0 1 2004 4–8 33.3% #116 1,507 0 0
22 2015 12–21 36.4% #70 1,563 0 1 2005 15–17 46.9% #41 1,622 0 0
23 2016 35–28 55.6% #28 1,707 0 1 2006 10–16 38.5% #85 1,575 0 0
24 2017 20–26 43.5% #57 1,639 0 2 2007 11–17 39.3% #73 1,561 0 1
25 2018 19–24 44.2% #59 1,609 0 3 2008 5–6 45.5% #84 1,584 0 1
26 2019 6–16 27.3% #89 1,594 0 3 2009 23–23 50.0% #63 1,664 0 2
27 2020 0–6 0.0% #115 1,540 0 3 2010 28–20 58.3% #38 1,818 0 3
28 2021 3–9 25.0% #160 1,495 0 3 2011 37–24 60.7% #23 1,775 0 6
29 2022 0–1 0.0% #336 1,454 0 3 2012 44–28 61.1% #16 1,831 0 7
30 2023 1–3 25.0% #188 1,480 0 3 2013 46–23 66.7% #14 1,850 0 9
31 2024 0–2 0.0% #338 1,450 0 3 2014 21–26 44.7% #47 1,712 0 9
32 — — — — — — — 2015 31–26 54.4% #15 1,751 0 9
33 — — — — — — — 2016 28–24 53.8% #18 1,719 0 10
34 — — — — — — — 2017 10–20 33.3% #116 1,608 0 10
35 — — — — — — — 2018 1–3 25.0% #193 1,627 0 10

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Timea Babos Roberta Vinci
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2001 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2012 7 6 13 53.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 2002 3 2 5 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2013 6 11 17 35.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2003 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 2014 2 8 10 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2004 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
22 2015 6 11 17 35.3% 4 7 11 36.4% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2005 6 9 15 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2016 25 19 44 56.8% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2006 6 9 15 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2017 19 17 36 52.8% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 2007 1 7 8 12.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
25 2018 17 16 33 51.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2008 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2019 5 13 18 27.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 8 13 21 38.1% 11 7 18 61.1% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
27 2020 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 18 11 29 62.1% 8 7 15 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 2021 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 15 16 31 48.4% 15 6 21 71.4% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
29 2022 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 25 14 39 64.1% 10 9 19 52.6% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 1 3 66.7%
30 2023 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2013 25 15 40 62.5% 16 5 21 76.2% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 2024 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 12 17 29 41.4% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 22 16 38 57.9% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 23 17 40 57.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 7 14 21 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 90 113 203 44.3% 25 45 70 35.7% 9 22 31 29.0% — — — — — 175 170 345 50.7% 101 83 184 54.9% 38 31 69 55.1% 6 6 12 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 283/304 of Timea Babos's and 479/595 of Roberta Vinci's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Timea Babos Roberta Vinci
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2010 1/1 4.0 2.0 57.1% 61.1% 37.0% 50.0% 16.7% 50.8% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 2/2 2.5 2.5 60.9% 71.5% 44.6% 50.0% 51.0% 61.3% 43.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2012 26/29 5.0 4.3 60.5% 65.8% 43.9% 52.1% 43.9% 57.0% 41.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2013 24/25 4.5 3.8 57.6% 62.5% 43.5% 48.6% 46.0% 54.5% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2014 13/15 5.7 4.2 60.5% 65.3% 43.7% 57.7% 37.2% 56.8% 38.9% 2004 2/12 3.5 6.0 54.0% 52.5% 34.2% 54.2% 26.1% 44.0% 39.1%
22 2015 25/33 3.3 3.3 67.1% 62.8% 48.2% 50.8% 42.4% 57.7% 38.1% 2005 5/32 2.2 4.6 59.5% 57.8% 40.8% 62.1% 38.8% 51.1% 37.0%
23 2016 57/63 4.5 3.6 62.3% 66.7% 46.0% 50.8% 46.3% 58.9% 43.2% 2006 13/26 2.2 3.1 60.3% 61.8% 40.9% 56.5% 39.7% 53.1% 40.8%
24 2017 46/46 4.6 3.5 62.3% 68.8% 43.7% 54.7% 49.3% 59.4% 40.0% 2007 21/28 1.6 2.9 61.9% 60.3% 46.9% 51.2% 40.7% 55.0% 42.2%
25 2018 42/43 4.4 4.0 60.0% 68.8% 46.8% 57.6% 44.3% 60.0% 41.8% 2008 10/11 1.1 3.1 62.3% 60.5% 45.6% 45.6% 59.7% 55.0% 47.1%
26 2019 22/22 3.9 4.5 58.6% 64.9% 40.5% 59.3% 38.6% 54.7% 37.9% 2009 42/46 1.5 2.5 59.1% 62.6% 45.3% 54.1% 48.2% 55.6% 44.7%
27 2020 6/6 1.0 3.5 59.2% 63.9% 42.1% 38.2% 45.8% 54.9% 31.3% 2010 46/48 2.3 1.7 59.1% 60.5% 49.2% 52.3% 44.8% 55.7% 42.0%
28 2021 12/12 4.3 4.3 55.0% 61.9% 39.8% 45.9% 48.4% 52.3% 37.6% 2011 55/61 1.9 2.2 57.4% 65.2% 47.8% 53.6% 49.9% 57.7% 44.6%
29 2022 1/1 3.0 4.0 60.6% 55.0% 46.2% 60.0% 25.0% 51.5% 38.6% 2012 64/72 3.0 2.3 56.2% 66.8% 48.5% 56.0% 53.1% 58.7% 46.3%
30 2023 4/4 1.8 4.3 62.9% 60.5% 40.4% 53.2% 74.6% 52.8% 42.7% 2013 62/69 3.0 2.0 59.0% 64.8% 47.7% 57.7% 46.3% 57.9% 46.5%
31 2024 2/2 9.0 3.5 57.7% 62.3% 54.4% 77.3% 19.6% 59.0% 34.4% 2014 41/47 2.6 2.9 53.1% 65.0% 46.7% 55.4% 50.4% 56.4% 44.7%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 39/57 2.4 1.6 61.9% 63.8% 49.1% 50.3% 50.0% 57.9% 43.9%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 48/52 2.3 1.7 60.6% 63.9% 45.9% 53.4% 46.3% 56.7% 43.0%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 27/30 2.0 1.8 61.2% 60.7% 44.8% 48.6% 41.5% 54.7% 40.8%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 4/4 2.5 1.3 62.7% 59.7% 43.1% 65.0% 67.6% 53.7% 39.4%
Career — 283/304 4.3 3.8 61.0% 66.0% 44.6% 53.1% 45.0% 57.6% 40.4% — 479/610 2.3 2.2 58.7% 63.6% 47.0% 54.0% 47.9% 56.7% 44.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Timea Babos Roberta Vinci
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2010 1491 99.7 +0.22 -2.30 0.677 42.5% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 1503 104.3 +0.80 +0.51 1.109 51.4% — — — 60.0% 0.00 0–1 1–0 — -0.11 2001 1485 96.3 — — — — +32 — — 28.6% -0.86 1–0 0–1 — +0.48
19 2012 1564 115.8 +1.04 -1.36 0.976 49.4% +20 -33 +62 49.3% -0.38 5–8 (38%) 6–5 (55%) 101.9 +0.38 2002 1478 99.9 — — — — +62 — — 38.9% -0.78 1–1 0–3 (0%) — +0.60
20 2013 1544 111.1 -0.34 -3.76 0.862 46.9% +14 +4 — 38.6% -0.95 5–4 (56%) 5–3 (63%) 102.2 -0.12 2003 1503 103.2 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.40 1–1 1–0 — -0.18
21 2014 1484 110.0 -0.66 -2.53 0.902 47.8% -2 — +90 40.0% -0.17 1–6 (14%) 1–3 (25%) 91.7 +0.74 2004 1508 106.2 -1.92 -0.61 0.697 41.7% -7 -34 +121 39.3% -0.50 1–3 (25%) 1–4 (20%) — -0.44
22 2015 1563 124.4 +0.04 -1.97 0.900 47.9% -39 -34 +34 38.2% -0.59 5–5 (50%) 4–8 (33%) 99.5 -2.03 2005 1622 124.1 -1.45 -2.43 0.757 44.7% -68 -125 +118 50.0% -0.27 5–7 (42%) 5–3 (63%) 104.0 -0.41
23 2016 1708 138.3 +2.77 +0.15 1.051 51.1% -28 -88 -104 53.8% +0.53 11–9 (55%) 7–12 (37%) 101.7 -0.26 2006 1576 114.9 -1.68 -1.84 0.869 47.1% -32 -53 — 40.4% -1.00 2–3 (40%) 2–0 — +0.35
24 2017 1639 130.8 +1.85 -2.67 0.986 49.9% +63 -67 -124 48.6% -0.01 6–13 (32%) 6–6 (50%) 93.3 +1.56 2007 1561 120.8 -0.41 -1.67 0.937 48.4% -41 +8 +148 42.2% -0.56 3–7 (30%) 2–2 (50%) 96.1 -0.85
25 2018 1610 134.0 +2.55 -1.23 1.046 50.9% +53 -69 -106 50.0% +0.25 3–11 (21%) 3–7 (30%) 88.6 +0.06 2008 1585 114.9 +0.77 +1.74 1.048 51.2% -57 -7 — 45.8% -0.08 1–1 — — -0.36
26 2019 1595 114.5 -1.44 -4.46 0.838 46.6% +29 -87 — 35.4% -1.15 1–7 (13%) 3–3 (50%) 93.4 +0.77 2009 1665 136.6 +0.16 +1.03 1.008 50.1% -103 +34 +76 49.0% +0.10 7–5 (58%) 5–8 (38%) 103.7 -2.09
27 2020 1540 108.8 +0.56 -3.13 0.694 43.3% +28 — — 7.7% -2.85 0–1 1–0 — -0.09 2010 1819 134.7 +0.73 -1.12 0.948 48.9% -39 -121 -80 54.6% -0.03 9–3 (75%) 9–3 (75%) 111.5 -2.49
28 2021 1496 105.1 -3.04 -3.61 0.789 45.0% +56 -88 — 29.2% -1.79 1–1 2–0 — +0.01 2011 1775 135.8 +1.59 +0.80 1.056 51.2% -60 +21 +63 59.0% +0.58 9–5 (64%) 7–4 (64%) 103.9 -0.43
29 2022 1454 101.3 +1.41 -1.79 0.796 44.9% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.06 2012 1832 144.5 +2.94 +2.39 1.122 52.5% +13 -119 +16 57.9% +0.71 11–6 (65%) 7–7 (50%) 102.8 -0.15
30 2023 1481 113.2 -0.36 -1.04 0.905 48.0% — -15 — 33.3% -1.11 0–1 0–1 — +0.04 2013 1851 142.8 +2.57 +2.61 1.105 52.1% -29 +17 +6 60.2% +0.67 18–9 (67%) 6–5 (55%) 103.7 +2.38
31 2024 1451 103.6 -0.62 +0.09 0.841 46.5% — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 0–2 — +0.13 2014 1713 131.6 +0.37 +0.72 1.024 50.4% -31 +121 — 46.2% -0.03 5–9 (36%) 1–4 (20%) 90.3 +0.40
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1751 136.1 -0.58 +2.38 1.042 51.0% +8 -27 -60 54.2% +0.18 10–13 (43%) 10–7 (59%) 99.9 +1.44
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1719 138.5 +0.67 +0.43 0.992 49.9% +36 -63 -24 52.1% +0.05 11–6 (65%) 8–3 (73%) 103.8 +2.16
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1608 128.5 -1.05 -1.18 0.901 47.8% +12 +33 +88 36.2% -0.86 4–5 (44%) 3–7 (30%) 95.9 -0.19
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1628 117.8 -2.45 -0.08 0.852 47.1% +51 — — 33.3% -1.22 0–1 — — -0.09
Career — 1758 128.1 +1.05 -1.91 0.952 49.0% +18 -54 -13 44.6% -0.28 38–68 (36%) 39–50 (44%) 90.6 +0.30 — 1921 138.3 +0.89 +0.85 1.018 50.4% -19 -18 +49 51.4% +0.08 99–85 (54%) 67–61 (52%) 103.3 +0.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.