H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Tina Mochizuki vs Pam Casale H2H: 1-0

Tina Mochizuki holds a 1–0 lead over Pam Casale in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tina Mochizuki leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tina Mochizuki won the 1980 Sioux City semifinal 6-4 4-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tina Mochizuki
USA Age 73
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Pam Casale
USA Age 62 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tina Mochizuki 6-4 4-6 6-4 Pam Casale Match data Jul 14, 1980* SF Sioux City WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tina Mochizuki — — — 1,679 84 134 38.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Pam Casale #671 #14 22 1,944 168 147 53.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tina Mochizuki Pam Casale
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1968 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1969 0–2 0.0% — 1,449 0 0 1980 15–10 60.0% — 1,597 0 0
17 1970 0–2 0.0% — 1,424 0 0 1981 30–17 63.8% — 1,810 0 0
18 1971 2–3 40.0% — 1,445 0 0 1982 20–23 46.5% — 1,745 0 0
19 1972 3–5 37.5% — 1,432 0 0 1983 23–20 53.5% — 1,770 0 0
20 1973 3–2 60.0% — 1,463 0 0 1984 31–17 64.6% #15 1,914 0 0
21 1974 0–1 0.0% — 1,452 0 0 1985 24–20 54.5% #14 1,814 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1986 16–17 48.5% #41 1,787 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 1987 5–11 31.2% #111 1,673 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 1988 4–10 28.6% #169 1,552 0 0
25 1978 0–1 0.0% — 1,438 0 0 1989 0–1 0.0% #225 1,547 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #554 1,525 0 0
27 1980 15–10 60.0% — 1,552 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 1981 13–7 65.0% — 1,612 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 1982 6–3 66.7% — 1,629 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 1983 11–13 45.8% — 1,602 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 1984 5–17 22.7% — 1,454 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 1985 5–12 29.4% — 1,475 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 1986 11–19 36.7% — 1,521 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 1987 8–25 24.2% — 1,455 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 1988 2–11 15.4% — 1,411 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tina Mochizuki Pam Casale
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1968 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1969 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1970 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 17 6 23 73.9% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0%
18 1971 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 10 16 37.5%
19 1972 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
20 1973 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 8 3 11 72.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 6 17 64.7%
21 1974 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 17 7 24 70.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 3 6 9 33.3% 11 5 16 68.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 1980 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1982 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1983 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1984 2 9 11 18.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1985 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1986 7 9 16 43.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1987 3 9 12 25.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1988 0 7 7 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 36 62 98 36.7% 9 27 36 25.0% 12 21 33 36.4% 5 12 17 29.4% — 66 49 115 57.4% 55 41 96 57.3% 15 19 34 44.1% 25 35 60 41.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tina Mochizuki Pam Casale
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1968 1484 98.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1969 1450 94.9 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 — — +0.55 1980 1598 118.7 — — — — +29 — — 57.4% +0.72 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — +2.02
17 1970 1425 82.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.75 — — — +0.38 1981 1811 140.3 — — — — -1 -153 -196 64.1% +1.03 3–6 (33%) 6–0 (100%) 101.9 +1.97
18 1971 1446 105.4 — — — — — +83 — 41.7% -1.67 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.16 1982 1745 140.3 — — — — -54 -4 -106 50.5% +0.01 1–8 (11%) 9–5 (64%) 95.5 -3.37
19 1972 1432 89.9 — — — — +20 +60 — 35.3% -1.53 1–0 1–0 — +1.65 1983 1770 144.1 — — — — -55 +93 -103 52.1% +0.47 5–3 (63%) 3–3 (50%) 102.6 -1.57
20 1973 1464 107.3 — — — — +59 — — 54.5% +0.55 1–0 0–1 — +0.92 1984 1914 155.3 — — — — +6 -60 -210 64.8% +1.01 3–6 (33%) 7–3 (70%) 100.3 -2.46
21 1974 1453 100.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.16 1985 1814 137.6 — — — — +80 -54 -188 53.1% +0.34 6–4 (60%) 3–3 (50%) 98.8 -1.08
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1788 137.1 — — — — -56 +52 — 46.8% -0.18 7–4 (64%) 6–3 (67%) 103.7 -3.63
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1673 114.3 — — — — -20 — -77 41.7% -0.56 3–5 (38%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.50
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1552 100.5 — — — — +25 +207 — 36.4% -0.79 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 92.4 +1.01
25 1978 1438 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.06 1989 1547 93.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.21
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1526 90.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.21
27 1980 1552 114.3 — — — — +26 — — 58.6% +0.64 4–4 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 102.3 +2.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1981 1612 122.2 — — — — — — — 61.2% +0.75 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 101.0 -0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1982 1630 109.6 — — — — -12 — — 57.9% +0.47 2–1 (67%) — — +1.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1983 1603 109.9 — — — — -3 -38 +4 45.0% -0.18 7–5 (58%) 2–5 (29%) 99.8 +2.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1984 1454 106.3 — — — — +20 +74 +143 34.6% -0.73 0–8 (0%) 1–5 (17%) 87.8 +1.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1985 1476 106.7 — — — — +39 -8 +73 27.8% -1.78 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 100.1 +0.99 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1986 1522 112.2 — — — — +26 -72 +33 36.4% -1.26 4–2 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 106.4 +1.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1987 1455 108.3 — — — — +35 -45 +65 27.4% -1.58 3–6 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 99.7 +0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1988 1412 109.7 — — — — -11 — +90 25.8% -1.32 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 96.9 +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1680 112.0 — — — — +21 +8 +60 40.2% -0.71 31–39 (44%) 20–25 (44%) 98.4 +6.88 — 1944 143.5 — — — — +1 +5 -153 53.9% +0.36 32–43 (43%) 38–21 (64%) 100.1 -2.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.