H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Tine Zwaan vs Almut Sturm H2H: 1-1
Tine Zwaan and Almut Sturm are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Tine Zwaan won the 1974 Madrid fourth round 1-6 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 1974* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Tine Zwaan | 1-6 6-2 6-0 | Almut Sturm | Match data |
| Jul 30, 1970* | Hilversum | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Almut Sturm | 6-3 6-4 | Tine Zwaan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tine Zwaan | — | — | — | 1,765 | 50 | 53 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Almut Sturm | — | — | — | 1,635 | 45 | 63 | 41.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tine Zwaan | Almut Sturm | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1968 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,455 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1969 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1970 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1972 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1973 | 8–7 | 53.3% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1974 | 17–13 | 56.7% | — | 1,686 | 0 | 3 | 1968 | 16–12 | 57.1% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1975 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,727 | 0 | 3 | 1969 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1976 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,685 | 0 | 3 | 1970 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 1978 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,647 | 0 | 3 | 1972 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 1979 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,643 | 0 | 3 | 1973 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 2 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 2 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 2 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 2 |