H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Tine Zwaan vs Kay Mcdaniel H2H: 1-0

Tine Zwaan holds a 1–0 lead over Kay Mcdaniel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tine Zwaan leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tine Zwaan won the 1974 Sebring round of 16 6-0 6-3.

H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tine Zwaan 6-0 6-3 Kay Mcdaniel Match data Mar 8, 1974* R16 Sebring WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tine Zwaan 1,758 49 53 48.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Kay Mcdaniel 1,653 18 40 31.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tine Zwaan Kay Mcdaniel
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1974 2–1 66.7% 1,515 0 0
18 1976 0–1 0.0% 1,498 0 0
19 1977 0–1 0.0% 1,485 0 0
20 1978 2–2 50.0% 1,520 0 0
21 1968 1–4 20.0% 1,455 0 0 1979 10–12 45.5% 1,625 0 0
22 1969 2–4 33.3% 1,459 0 0 1980 2–12 14.3% 1,554 0 0
23 1970 2–2 50.0% 1,473 0 0 1981 0–2 0.0% 1,528 0 0
24 1982 1–3 25.0% 1,501 0 0
25 1972 2–1 66.7% 1,494 0 1
26 1973 8–7 53.3% 1,577 0 3
27 1974 17–13 56.7% 1,664 0 3 1985 1–2 33.3% 1,484 0 0
28 1975 10–12 45.5% 1,720 0 3 1986 0–3 0.0% 1,453 0 0
29 1976 0–3 0.0% 1,680 0 3 1987 0–1 0.0% 1,447 0 0
31 1978 3–4 42.9% 1,644 0 3
32 1979 4–3 57.1% 1,638 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tine Zwaan Kay Mcdaniel
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1974 2 1 3 66.7%
20 1978 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1968 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1979 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 4 6 33.3%
22 1969 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1980 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
23 1970 2 2 4 50.0% 1981 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1982 1 3 4 25.0%
25 1972 2 1 3 66.7%
26 1973 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
27 1974 2 1 3 66.7% 13 7 20 65.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
28 1975 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1986 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 0 1 1 0.0%
31 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
32 1979 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 6 7 13 46.2% 28 24 52 53.8% 8 10 18 44.4% 5 10 15 33.3% 7 13 20 35.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 9 11 18.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tine Zwaan Kay Mcdaniel
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1974 1516 99.4 +25 57.1% -0.28 1–0 +0.38
18 1976 1498 99.0 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 0.00
19 1977 1486 99.4 0.0% -3.00 -0.04
20 1978 1520 109.0 +104 55.6% +0.78 0–1 0–1 +0.20
21 1968 1456 96.5 -17 30.8% -1.00 1–2 (33%) +0.18 1979 1625 126.4 +23 +26 43.4% -0.57 6–3 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 109.0 +0.41
22 1969 1460 97.7 -1 33.3% -1.25 +0.44 1980 1555 99.2 -19 +36 21.9% -2.47 1–3 (25%) 2–0 -0.34
23 1970 1474 106.5 +13 44.4% 0.00 1–0 +0.63 1981 1528 94.7 0.0% -4.25 -0.09
24 1982 1501 104.3 +21 40.0% -0.30 0–2 1–1 +0.49
25 1972 1494 106.3 +26 57.1% +1.14 1–0 +0.65
26 1973 1577 120.6 +34 -48 47.1% -0.15 4–0 (100%) +1.58
27 1974 1665 127.2 -134 +54 -85 55.1% +0.28 5–6 (45%) 1–1 +0.78 1985 1485 96.2 33.3% -1.33 1–0 +0.03
28 1975 1721 117.0 -42 -18 44.0% -1.02 6–2 (75%) 3–3 (50%) 106.7 -1.07 1986 1454 95.8 14.3% -2.14 0–1 +0.25
29 1976 1681 104.3 14.3% -2.43 0–1 -0.04 1987 1447 99.8 0.0% -3.50 +0.02
31 1978 1644 98.7 +8 37.5% -0.69 2–0 0–1 +1.41
32 1979 1638 113.7 -48 52.9% +0.94 2–1 (67%) 0–3 (0%) 98.4 +1.40
Career 1758 120.5 -57 +27 -61 46.2% -0.29 22–12 (65%) 4–8 (33%) 106.6 +5.90 1653 110.7 +19 +25 +29 34.8% -1.20 8–11 (42%) 8–4 (67%) 103.3 +2.26

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.