H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Tory Ann Fretz vs Almut Sturm H2H: 2-0
Tory Ann Fretz holds a 2–0 lead over Almut Sturm in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tory Ann Fretz leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tory Ann Fretz won the 1969 San Juan third round 6-1 5-2 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 1969* | San Juan | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Tory Ann Fretz | 6-1 5-2 (ret.) | Almut Sturm | Match data |
| Mar 23, 1969* | St. Petersburg | WTA 500 | QF | Clay | Tory Ann Fretz | 10-8 9-7 | Almut Sturm | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tory Ann Fretz | — | — | — | 1,802 | 104 | 102 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Almut Sturm | — | — | — | 1,635 | 45 | 63 | 41.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tory Ann Fretz | Almut Sturm | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 25 | 1968 | 28–14 | 66.7% | — | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1969 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1970 | 5–7 | 41.7% | — | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 16–12 | 57.1% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1971 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1973 | 10–20 | 33.3% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 1974 | 9–13 | 40.9% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 1975 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,723 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 1976 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 2 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 2 |
| 38 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 2 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 2 |