H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Tracy Austin vs Anna Maria Fernandez H2H: 2-0
Tracy Austin holds a 2–0 lead over Anna Maria Fernandez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tracy Austin leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tracy Austin won the 1980 Tucson third round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 63
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Age 65
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 1980* | Tucson | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Tracy Austin | 6-1 6-2 | Anna Maria Fernandez | Match data |
| Sep 4, 1978* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Tracy Austin | 6-1 6-2 | Anna Maria Fernandez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tracy Austin | #81 | #4 | 19 | 2,484 | 339 | 88 | 79.4% | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 19 | 28 |
| Anna Maria Fernandez | — | — | — | 1,717 | 54 | 97 | 35.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tracy Austin | Anna Maria Fernandez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1977 | 14–8 | 63.6% | — | 1,777 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1978 | 43–13 | 76.8% | — | 2,055 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1979 | 73–12 | 85.9% | — | 2,412 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1980 | 81–10 | 89.0% | — | 2,383 | 1 | 19 | 1978 | 10–4 | 71.4% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1981 | 56–7 | 88.9% | — | 2,406 | 2 | 27 | 1979 | 0–6 | 0.0% | — | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1982 | 35–12 | 74.5% | — | 2,224 | 2 | 28 | 1980 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1983 | 24–8 | 75.0% | — | 2,162 | 2 | 28 | 1981 | 6–5 | 54.5% | — | 1,615 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1984 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #27 | 2,115 | 2 | 28 | 1982 | 9–10 | 47.4% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 9–21 | 30.0% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 2–7 | 22.2% | — | 1,430 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 2,057 | 2 | 28 | 1987 | 8–16 | 33.3% | — | 1,426 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,436 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1993 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #117 | 1,955 | 2 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1994 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #81 | 1,840 | 2 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |