H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Tracy Austin vs Pam Casale H2H: 2-1

Tracy Austin holds a 2–1 lead over Pam Casale in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tracy Austin leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Pam Casale leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Pam Casale won the 1984 East Hanover round of 16 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tracy Austin
USA Age 63 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Pam Casale
USA Age 62 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pam Casale #26 7-5 6-3 Tracy Austin #14 Match data Feb 24, 1984* R16 East Hanover WTA 250 Carpet
Tracy Austin 6-3 6-0 Pam Casale Match data Sep 7, 1981* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Tracy Austin 6-3 6-1 Pam Casale Match data Aug 20, 1981* R32 Canadian Open WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tracy Austin — #1 19 2,522 341 88 79.5% 2 0 1 12 15 30
Pam Casale — #14 22 1,944 168 147 53.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tracy Austin Pam Casale
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1977 14–8 63.6% — 1,780 0 1 — — — — — — —
15 1978 44–13 77.2% #6 2,087 0 3 — — — — — — —
16 1979 73–12 85.9% #3 2,436 1 10 1980 15–10 60.0% — 1,597 0 0
17 1980 82–10 89.1% #2 2,463 1 21 1981 30–17 63.8% — 1,811 0 0
18 1981 56–7 88.9% #2 2,449 2 29 1982 20–23 46.5% — 1,746 0 0
19 1982 35–12 74.5% #4 2,267 2 30 1983 23–20 53.5% — 1,770 0 0
20 1983 24–8 75.0% #9 2,189 2 30 1984 31–17 64.6% #15 1,914 0 0
21 1984 2–2 50.0% — 2,139 2 30 1985 24–20 54.5% — 1,815 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1986 16–17 48.5% #41 1,788 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 1987 5–11 31.2% #111 1,673 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 1988 4–10 28.6% #169 1,552 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 1989 0–1 0.0% #225 1,547 0 0
26 1989 0–2 0.0% — 2,081 2 30 1990 0–1 0.0% — 1,526 0 0
30 1993 6–6 50.0% #117 1,972 2 30 — — — — — — —
31 1994 5–8 38.5% — 1,852 2 30 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tracy Austin Pam Casale
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1977 4 2 6 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1978 16 5 21 76.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1979 22 4 26 84.6% 10 0 10 100.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 33 6 39 84.6% 1980 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1980 19 4 23 82.6% 8 1 9 88.9% 11 1 12 91.7% 44 4 48 91.7% 1981 17 6 23 73.9% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0%
18 1981 22 0 22 100.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 12 2 14 85.7% 20 4 24 83.3% 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 10 16 37.5%
19 1982 11 2 13 84.6% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 15 6 21 71.4% 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
20 1983 — — — — 8 2 10 80.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 12 5 17 70.6% 1984 8 3 11 72.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 6 17 64.7%
21 1984 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1985 17 7 24 70.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 3 6 9 33.3% 11 5 16 68.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 1993 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1994 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 102 26 128 79.7% 44 13 57 77.2% 49 14 63 77.8% 141 34 175 80.6% — 66 49 115 57.4% 55 41 96 57.3% 15 19 34 44.1% 25 35 60 41.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tracy Austin Pam Casale
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1977 1781 150.1 — — — — -85 -31 — 59.1% +0.55 2–0 1–0 — -1.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1978 2087 165.9 — — — — -15 -282 -367 73.1% +2.01 6–3 (67%) 7–2 (78%) 108.9 -2.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1979 2436 178.9 — — — — +5 -373 -551 80.9% +2.33 13–3 (81%) 6–3 (67%) 110.9 -8.70 1980 1598 118.8 — — — — +31 — — 57.4% +0.72 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — +2.08
17 1980 2464 180.2 — — — — +151 -327 -415 85.5% +3.11 12–3 (80%) 4–2 (67%) 104.3 -4.53 1981 1811 140.6 — — — — -1 -153 -195 64.1% +1.03 3–6 (33%) 6–0 (100%) 101.9 +2.45
18 1981 2450 175.9 — — — — +119 -339 -340 84.6% +2.88 7–3 (70%) 7–4 (64%) 101.5 -3.61 1982 1746 140.5 — — — — -55 -5 -107 50.5% +0.01 1–8 (11%) 9–5 (64%) 95.6 -2.94
19 1982 2267 167.2 — — — — +185 -147 -207 75.5% +2.05 4–6 (40%) 4–1 (80%) 94.0 -1.41 1983 1771 144.3 — — — — -54 +93 -103 52.1% +0.47 5–3 (63%) 3–3 (50%) 102.6 -1.30
20 1983 2189 159.8 — — — — +140 -59 -83 76.5% +1.88 2–4 (33%) 4–1 (80%) 94.9 -1.86 1984 1915 155.4 — — — — +5 -61 -210 64.8% +1.01 3–6 (33%) 7–3 (70%) 100.3 -3.10
21 1984 2140 115.0 — — — — +111 — — 50.0% +0.13 — — — +0.03 1985 1815 137.8 — — — — +80 -55 -189 53.1% +0.34 6–4 (60%) 3–3 (50%) 98.8 -1.03
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1788 137.2 — — — — -55 +53 — 46.8% -0.18 7–4 (64%) 6–3 (67%) 103.8 -3.60
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1674 114.3 — — — — -20 — -78 41.7% -0.56 3–5 (38%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.56
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1552 100.5 — — — — +26 +207 — 36.4% -0.79 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 92.4 +1.02
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1547 93.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.23
26 1989 2082 101.4 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.05 1990 1526 90.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.21
30 1993 1973 123.4 — — — — +28 — — 46.4% -0.97 3–1 (75%) — — -0.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1994 1852 118.5 — — — — +78 +126 — 36.7% -0.97 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — -1.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2522 175.8 — — — — +83 -173 -353 76.3% +2.13 52–25 (68%) 33–14 (70%) 108.9 -5.99 — 1945 143.6 — — — — +2 +5 -154 53.9% +0.36 32–43 (43%) 38–21 (64%) 100.1 -2.23

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.