H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Tracy Austin vs Pam Casale H2H: 2-1
Tracy Austin holds a 2–1 lead over Pam Casale in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tracy Austin leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Pam Casale leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Pam Casale won the 1984 East Hanover fourth round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 63
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 1984* | East Hanover | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Pam Casale | 7-5 6-3 | Tracy Austin | Match data |
| Sep 7, 1981* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Tracy Austin | 6-3 6-0 | Pam Casale | Match data |
| Aug 17, 1981 | Toronto | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Tracy Austin | 6-3 6-1 | Pam Casale | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tracy Austin | #81 | #4 | 19 | 2,484 | 339 | 88 | 79.4% | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 19 | 28 |
| Pam Casale | #671 | #14 | 22 | 1,944 | 168 | 147 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tracy Austin | Pam Casale | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1977 | 14–8 | 63.6% | — | 1,777 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1978 | 43–13 | 76.8% | — | 2,055 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1979 | 73–12 | 85.9% | — | 2,412 | 1 | 9 | 1980 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1980 | 81–10 | 89.0% | — | 2,383 | 1 | 19 | 1981 | 30–17 | 63.8% | — | 1,811 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1981 | 56–7 | 88.9% | — | 2,406 | 2 | 27 | 1982 | 20–23 | 46.5% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1982 | 35–12 | 74.5% | — | 2,224 | 2 | 28 | 1983 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1983 | 24–8 | 75.0% | — | 2,162 | 2 | 28 | 1984 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #15 | 1,914 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1984 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #27 | 2,115 | 2 | 28 | 1985 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #14 | 1,814 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #41 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #111 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #169 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 2,057 | 2 | 28 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #554 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1993 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #117 | 1,955 | 2 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1994 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #81 | 1,840 | 2 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |