H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Tsvetana Pironkova vs Flavia Pennetta H2H: 1-3
Flavia Pennetta holds a 3–1 lead over Tsvetana Pironkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Flavia Pennetta leads 2–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Flavia Pennetta won the 2015 Miami second round 6-7(1) 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BUL
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2015* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Flavia Pennetta | 6-7(1) 6-3 6-3 | Tsvetana Pironkova | Match data |
| Jan 15, 2015* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Tsvetana Pironkova | 6-3 7-6(4) | Flavia Pennetta | Match data |
| Jul 16, 2011* | Palermo | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Flavia Pennetta | 6-2 6-2 | Tsvetana Pironkova | Match data |
| May 6, 2009* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Flavia Pennetta | 6-7(2) 6-4 6-1 | Tsvetana Pironkova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tsvetana Pironkova | #1,170 | #31 | 1,805 | 1,770 | 169 | 222 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Flavia Pennetta | #15 | #6 | 3,621 | 1,982 | 418 | 272 | 60.6% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tsvetana Pironkova | Flavia Pennetta | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2005 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #86 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2006 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #64 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2007 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #95 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2008 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #44 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #95 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #97 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #69 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #35 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #38 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2011 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #46 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #23 | 1,777 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2012 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #42 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #28 | 1,729 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2013 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #108 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #39 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2014 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #38 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 50–23 | 68.5% | #13 | 1,900 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2015 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #59 | 1,633 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 52–23 | 69.3% | #12 | 1,902 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2016 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #64 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #24 | 1,847 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 2017 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #165 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #20 | 1,785 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #45 | 1,735 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #31 | 1,745 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | 2020 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #136 | 1,739 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #12 | 1,780 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | 2021 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #252 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #8 | 1,823 | 1 | 11 |