H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Tsvetana Pironkova vs Jill Craybas H2H: 0-3

Jill Craybas holds a 3–0 lead over Tsvetana Pironkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jill Craybas leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jill Craybas won the 2010 Palermo fourth round 2-6 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tsvetana Pironkova
BUL Age 38 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main draw meetings
Jill Craybas
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 16, 2010* Palermo WTA 250 R16 Clay Jill Craybas #110 2-6 6-2 6-2 Tsvetana Pironkova #35 Match data
Jun 24, 2009* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Jill Craybas #90 6-4 7-5 Tsvetana Pironkova #83 Match data
May 26, 2009* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Jill Craybas #97 7-5 6-2 Tsvetana Pironkova #69 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tsvetana Pironkova #1,170 #31 1,805 1,770 169 222 43.2% 0 0 0 1 0 1
Jill Craybas #336 #39 974 1,695 161 256 38.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tsvetana Pironkova Jill Craybas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2005 6–3 66.7% #86 1,599 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2006 15–16 48.4% #64 1,662 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2007 7–15 31.8% #95 1,596 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2008 15–17 46.9% #44 1,631 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2009 9–20 31.0% #97 1,546 0 0 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0
22 2010 16–15 51.6% #35 1,623 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2011 13–22 37.1% #46 1,644 0 0 1998 0–1 0.0% #154 1,473 0 0
24 2012 19–23 45.2% #42 1,658 0 0 1999 0–4 0.0% #175 1,445 0 0
25 2013 9–21 30.0% #108 1,561 0 0 2000 1–2 33.3% #145 1,449 0 0
26 2014 17–19 47.2% #38 1,619 0 1 2001 8–17 32.0% #98 1,479 0 0
27 2015 18–21 46.2% #59 1,633 0 1 2002 19–15 55.9% #57 1,652 0 1
28 2016 10–12 45.5% #64 1,671 0 1 2003 16–22 42.1% #99 1,568 0 1
29 2017 6–10 37.5% #165 1,639 0 1 2004 12–21 36.4% #59 1,499 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2005 19–23 45.2% #48 1,614 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2006 18–25 41.9% #70 1,569 0 1
32 2020 6–2 75.0% #136 1,739 0 1 2007 12–27 30.8% #79 1,472 0 1
33 2021 3–6 33.3% #252 1,706 0 1 2008 22–25 46.8% #64 1,575 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2009 12–21 36.4% #76 1,592 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2010 12–23 34.3% #98 1,546 0 1
36 — — — — — — — 2011 6–20 23.1% #150 1,442 0 1
37 — — — — — — — 2012 3–7 30.0% #189 1,449 0 1
38 — — — — — — — 2013 1–2 33.3% #336 1,451 0 1