H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Tsvetana Pironkova vs Petra Cetkovska H2H: 0-1
Petra Cetkovska holds a 1–0 lead over Tsvetana Pironkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Petra Cetkovska leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Petra Cetkovska won the 2014 Rome second round 1-6 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BUL
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 41
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2014* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Petra Cetkovska | 1-6 6-1 6-4 | Tsvetana Pironkova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tsvetana Pironkova | #1,170 | #31 | 1,805 | 1,770 | 169 | 222 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Petra Cetkovska | #954 | #25 | 1,955 | 1,761 | 73 | 81 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tsvetana Pironkova | Petra Cetkovska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2005 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #86 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2006 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #64 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2007 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #95 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2008 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #44 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2009 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #97 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2010 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #35 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #46 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #83 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #42 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #149 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #108 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #143 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #38 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #59 | 1,633 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #55 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #64 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #139 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2017 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #165 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #58 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #591 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2020 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #136 | 1,739 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2021 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #252 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |