H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:30 UTC
Urszula Radwanska vs Irina Falconi Hartman H2H: 0-1
Irina Falconi Hartman holds a 1–0 lead over Urszula Radwanska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Irina Falconi Hartman leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Irina Falconi Hartman won the 2012 Birmingham fourth round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 35
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2012* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Irina Falconi Hartman | 7-5 6-3 | Urszula Radwanska | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Urszula Radwanska | #493 | #29 | 1,565 | 1,747 | 99 | 130 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Irina Falconi Hartman | #1,008 | #63 | 1,005 | 1,614 | 42 | 72 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Urszula Radwanska | Irina Falconi Hartman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2006 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #313 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #252 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #84 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #129 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #151 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #70 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #193 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #112 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #105 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #76 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #31 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #99 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #40 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #129 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #179 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #271 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #94 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #257 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |