H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Urszula Radwanska vs Ksenia Pervak H2H: 2-2
Urszula Radwanska and Ksenia Pervak are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Ksenia Pervak leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Urszula Radwanska leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ksenia Pervak won the 2013 Brisbane fourth round 3-6 6-2 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 35
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 35
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2013* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Ksenia Pervak | 3-6 6-2 7-6(6) | Urszula Radwanska | Match data |
| Aug 15, 2012* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Urszula Radwanska | 6-2 6-4 | Ksenia Pervak | Match data |
| Jun 21, 2012* | 's Hertogenbosch | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Urszula Radwanska | 4-6 6-1 6-4 | Ksenia Pervak | Match data |
| Sep 17, 2011* | Tashkent | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Ksenia Pervak | 6-2 6-4 | Urszula Radwanska | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Urszula Radwanska | #493 | #29 | 1,565 | 1,747 | 99 | 130 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ksenia Pervak | #834 | #37 | 1,475 | 1,703 | 53 | 63 | 45.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Urszula Radwanska | Ksenia Pervak | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2006 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #313 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2007 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #252 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #129 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2009 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #70 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #129 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #193 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #97 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #105 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #39 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2012 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #31 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #103 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2013 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #40 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2014 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #179 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #151 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2015 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #94 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #257 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2021 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |