H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Urszula Radwanska vs Lourdes Domínguez Lino H2H: 0-1

Lourdes Domínguez Lino holds a 1–0 lead over Urszula Radwanska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lourdes Domínguez Lino leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lourdes Domínguez Lino won the 2010 US Open second round 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Urszula Radwanska
Poland Age 35 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Spain Age 45 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #148 6-2 7-5 Urszula Radwanska #339 Match data Sep 2, 2010* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Urszula Radwanska #493 #29 1,565 1,746 100 131 43.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #1,129 #40 1,305 1,673 125 157 44.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Urszula Radwanska Lourdes Domínguez Lino
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2006 2–3 40.0% #313 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2007 3–3 50.0% #252 1,539 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2008 3–6 33.3% #129 1,516 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2009 16–22 42.1% #70 1,555 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2010 1–3 25.0% #193 1,551 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #141 1,489 0 0
20 2011 10–11 47.6% #105 1,575 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #378 1,479 0 0
21 2012 27–25 51.9% #31 1,710 0 0 2002 4–3 57.1% #390 1,518 0 0
22 2013 21–23 47.7% #40 1,700 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #319 1,503 0 0
23 2014 3–11 21.4% #179 1,594 0 0 2004 1–1 50.0% #208 1,508 0 0
24 2015 12–15 44.4% #94 1,579 0 0 2005 6–4 60.0% #72 1,553 0 0
25 2016 2–5 28.6% #257 1,531 0 0 2006 21–19 52.5% #52 1,623 0 1
26 — — — — — — — 2007 16–21 43.2% #71 1,557 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 2008 6–11 35.3% #91 1,507 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 2009 6–13 31.6% #134 1,477 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2010 2–4 33.3% #85 1,487 0 1
30 2021 0–4 0.0% #231 1,452 0 0 2011 16–16 50.0% #79 1,574 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2012 16–16 50.0% #48 1,652 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2013 17–22 43.6% #69 1,620 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2014 7–11 38.9% #110 1,568 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2015 4–5 44.4% #100 1,550 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2016 3–8 27.3% #220 1,516 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Urszula Radwanska Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2006 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2007 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2008 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2009 11 15 26 42.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2011 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2012 17 17 34 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — 2002 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — —
22 2013 15 15 30 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2014 3 6 9 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2004 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2015 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2005 — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2016 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 7 10 17 41.2% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 3 9 12 25.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 4 4 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 3 4 25.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2021 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 3 6 9 33.3% 11 8 19 57.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 10 8 18 55.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1 8 9 11.1% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 0 5 5 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
Career — 75 91 166 45.2% 9 23 32 28.1% 16 16 32 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — 27 59 86 31.4% 94 88 182 51.6% 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Urszula Radwanska Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2006 1525 115.3 — — — — — +24 — 40.0% -0.70 — 0–1 — -0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2007 1539 110.6 -1.56 -0.20 1.009 50.0% +22 — — 57.1% +0.64 0–2 1–1 — +0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2008 1517 107.6 -2.91 -0.90 0.806 45.0% +3 — — 40.0% -0.45 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2009 1555 121.6 -1.78 -0.41 0.921 48.0% -11 -56 +108 42.5% -0.65 6–4 (60%) 5–1 (83%) 108.8 +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 1552 113.9 +0.83 +2.32 0.833 46.6% -5 — — 25.0% -2.13 — — — -0.32 2000 1489 98.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.06
20 2011 1575 116.1 -1.08 +0.22 1.028 50.6% +16 -91 — 48.1% +0.02 6–6 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 99.3 +1.19 2001 1480 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.06
21 2012 1710 130.1 -1.38 +2.06 0.990 49.6% -35 -192 -2 49.1% -0.05 6–4 (60%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 +0.60 2002 1519 112.4 — — — — — +41 — 57.1% +0.14 — 2–1 (67%) — +0.22
22 2013 1700 138.3 -2.18 +1.30 0.945 48.6% +10 -144 -15 44.9% -0.39 8–4 (67%) 8–3 (73%) 111.9 -1.35 2003 1503 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.07
23 2014 1595 109.0 -3.72 -0.43 0.869 47.1% +59 -95 — 25.9% -1.56 0–3 (0%) — — -1.04 2004 1509 105.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.34 1–1 0–1 — +0.01
24 2015 1579 115.7 -3.71 +0.71 0.914 47.8% +43 — +45 45.0% -0.53 5–3 (63%) 3–2 (60%) 102.8 -0.35 2005 1553 117.7 — — — — — +72 — 61.9% +0.38 0–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.23
25 2016 1532 111.4 -0.85 +0.76 0.939 48.4% +53 — — 42.9% -0.07 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.48 2006 1623 121.0 — — — — -68 +93 — 51.2% -0.30 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 102.8 +0.22
26 2017 1519 95.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1558 113.3 — — — — -56 +110 — 43.2% -0.49 4–3 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 100.6 -0.29
27 2018 1506 100.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1508 107.1 — — — — -48 +107 — 37.8% -1.11 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — -0.03
28 2019 1484 100.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1477 108.0 — — — — -35 +83 — 37.8% -0.82 2–5 (29%) 2–5 (29%) 95.2 +0.87
29 2020 1466 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1487 102.6 — — — — 0 — — 35.7% -1.36 1–1 0–1 — +0.13
30 2021 1453 105.6 -1.63 -4.19 0.666 42.3% +42 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — -0.17 2011 1575 121.5 — — — — -73 0 +20 50.0% +0.11 6–6 (50%) 1–7 (13%) 95.2 +0.42
31 2022 1441 96.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1653 124.6 — — — — -17 -96 — 54.3% +0.04 2–6 (25%) 4–1 (80%) 100.6 0.00
32 2023 1428 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1620 121.2 — — — — -86 +113 — 41.3% -0.81 10–8 (56%) 2–3 (40%) 103.9 -1.33
33 2024 1441 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1569 107.5 — — — — -102 +137 — 40.0% -0.89 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.57
34 2025 1426 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1550 113.7 -1.03 +0.35 0.984 50.1% — +126 — 50.0% -0.05 1–3 (25%) 2–0 — +0.51
35 2026 1432 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1517 97.5 -3.20 -2.29 0.761 44.1% -86 +117 — 25.0% -1.75 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.18
Career — 1747 127.6 -1.98 +0.73 0.940 48.6% +7 -111 +29 43.8% -0.43 31–31 (50%) 25–20 (56%) 106.1 -0.65 — 1674 120.0 -2.29 -1.18 0.851 46.6% -55 +78 +20 45.2% -0.48 35–45 (44%) 26–29 (47%) 98.8 +0.46

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.