H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC
Urszula Radwanska vs Romina Oprandi H2H: 0-1
Romina Oprandi holds a 1–0 lead over Urszula Radwanska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Romina Oprandi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Romina Oprandi won the 2012 Beijing second round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 35
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 40
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2012* | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Romina Oprandi | 7-5 6-2 | Urszula Radwanska | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Urszula Radwanska | #493 | #29 | 1,565 | 1,747 | 99 | 130 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Romina Oprandi | #895 | #32 | 1,490 | 1,694 | 54 | 88 | 38.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Urszula Radwanska | Romina Oprandi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2006 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #313 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2007 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #252 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #129 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2009 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #70 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #193 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #105 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #31 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #256 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #40 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2014 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #179 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #215 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #94 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #66 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #257 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #82 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #61 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #78 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #114 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2021 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #397 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |