H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:30 UTC
Urszula Radwanska vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 1-0
Urszula Radwanska holds a 1–0 lead over Tamira Paszek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Urszula Radwanska leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Urszula Radwanska won the 2013 Brisbane third round 2-6 6-0 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 35
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 35
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2013* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Urszula Radwanska | 2-6 6-0 6-2 | Tamira Paszek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Urszula Radwanska | #493 | #29 | 1,565 | 1,747 | 99 | 130 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tamira Paszek | — | — | — | 1,801 | 99 | 128 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Urszula Radwanska | Tamira Paszek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 2006 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #313 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 6–2 | 75.0% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 2007 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #252 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #129 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 16–18 | 47.1% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2009 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #70 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #193 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2011 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #105 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 19–21 | 47.5% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2012 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #31 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2013 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #40 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–17 | 10.5% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2014 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #179 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2015 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #94 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,447 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #257 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2021 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |