H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Valerie Ziegenfuss vs Almut Sturm H2H: 2-0
Valerie Ziegenfuss holds a 2–0 lead over Almut Sturm in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Valerie Ziegenfuss leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Valerie Ziegenfuss won the 1972 Hamburg third round 4-6 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 1972* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Valerie Ziegenfuss | 4-6 6-2 6-1 | Almut Sturm | Match data |
| Mar 14, 1969* | Barranquilla | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Valerie Ziegenfuss | 3-6 6-3 6-0 | Almut Sturm | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Valerie Ziegenfuss | — | — | — | 1,952 | 231 | 232 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Almut Sturm | — | — | — | 1,635 | 45 | 63 | 41.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Valerie Ziegenfuss | Almut Sturm | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1968 | 35–24 | 59.3% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1969 | 28–24 | 53.8% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1970 | 40–28 | 58.8% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1971 | 23–29 | 44.2% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1972 | 26–24 | 52.0% | — | 1,829 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1973 | 33–29 | 53.2% | — | 1,759 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1974 | 12–14 | 46.2% | — | 1,786 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1975 | 16–16 | 50.0% | — | 1,822 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1976 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,742 | 0 | 3 | 1968 | 16–12 | 57.1% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1977 | 2–12 | 14.3% | — | 1,674 | 0 | 3 | 1969 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1978 | 3–11 | 21.4% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 3 | 1970 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 3 | 1971 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 2 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 2 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 2 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 2 |